We're 90 per cent sure the FCC's robocall kill plan won't have the slightest impact

Dumb and dumber, or the lightest of light touches?

Motivation – follow the...

So why are the phone companies dragging their feet? You won't believe this but the answer is money.

It costs phone companies money to install a blocking system right across their network, and they lose money generated by the billions of fake calls. Some phone companies have reportedly considered offering the service for an additional fee (Nomorobo charges $1.99 a month for its iOS app).

But they are wary about opening that door and having a regulator like the FCC telling them to make it free, or getting involved in an industry race where one company offers it for free to attract customers and effectively forces everyone to have to do likewise.

Will the FCC bring its regulatory powers to bear on the issue? Probably not. Pai has made great play since taking over as chair about how the FCC under him will be hands-off, or "light touch," as he likes to call it.

He has used this argument to justify killing off and shutting down many of the rules developed under his predecessor covering, in particular, net neutrality. It's going to be difficult for Pai to come down hard on phone companies for failing to block spoofed calls if he wants to maintain this philosophy.

Instead, what a "light touch" FCC looks like is one that puts out seemingly endless calls for public input on what should happen – even when everyone knows what needs to happen and why it isn't happening.

As well as "seeking input" on the plan to block fake numbers, the FCC also wants to know people's ideas about "how to address spoofed calls from international locations" and it is "asking how to create a safe harbor for providers from FCC call completion rules when they rely on objective criteria to identify and block calls that are highly likely to be fraudulent, illegal, or spoofed robocalls."

Back in October, when the industry-led Robocall Strike Force held its second meeting, then-FCC chair Tom Wheeler lambasted it for going too slowly in finding solutions. He pushed for another meeting in six months where he wanted to hear some real answers.

This week, it is six months later. There's no meeting of the strike force, but we do have an op-ed from the FCC chair and a proposal to ask what people think about a solution that won't work.

You don't get much more light touch than that. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022