Minnesota, Illinois rebel over America's ISP privacy massacre, mull fresh info protections

Yeah, not so fast, Comcast, Verizon et al, say US states

President Trump has yet to sign off on congressional legislation that allows American ISPs to sell their subscribers' online habits to advertisers – but US states aren't waiting for his signature and are moving to protect their constituents' privacy.

On Tuesday, the Minnesota House of Representatives introduced legislation to ensure that those living in the state would have to give written permission to their internet providers before it could sell details of their private internet activities. The legislation easily passed through the House.

The following day, Minnesota Senator Ron Latz (DFL‑St Louis Park) introduced an amendment to a budget bill that would require ISPs to get written consent from customers before selling off their browser histories to marketers.

Republicans tried to block the move by insisting it go through a committee stage, but Senator Warren Limmer (R‑Maple Grove) crossed the aisle and voted to ensure the amendment was considered. It was then added to the bill by a 66‑1 vote, with one Republican senator voting against, arguing that more study of the issue was needed.

Once the state's Senate and House have worked out the final wording of the privacy safeguards, the bill will be passed to the governor to sign – and then it's live.

"We should be outraged at the invasion that's being allowed on our most intimate means of communication," Limmer told the Twin Cities Pioneer Press. "This ... urgently needs to be addressed."

Illinois, too, has decided to fight back with its own ideas. On Thursday, the state's Cybersecurity, Data Analytics & IT Committee approved two new privacy measures. One would allow state residents to demand what data companies such as Comcast, Verizon, Google and Facebook is sharing about them. The other would require consent before an app can track users' locations. The bills are in an early stage of development, and are still being debated.

Several other states are said to be considering legislation in response to Congress' new rules eliminating privacy protections for internet users in America. Public opinion isn't in favor of letting ISPs have a free hand. If you're hoping Donald will scupper efforts to open up people's private data to advertisers, forget it: the White House said in a statement that Trump's advisors "would recommend that he sign the bill into law." ®

PS: How about the time Google – the online advertising giant that once had dreams of becoming an ISP – wrote to the FCC strongly in favor of scrapping opt-in privacy protections for online browser histories?

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • 5G C-band rollout at US airports slowed over radio altimeter safety fears
    Well, they did say from July, now they really mean from July 2023

    America's aviation watchdog has said the rollout of 5G C-band coverage near US airports won't fully start until next year, delaying some travelers' access to better cellular broadband at crowded terminals.

    Acting FAA Administrator Billy Nolen said in a statement this month that its discussions with wireless carriers "have identified a path that will continue to enable aviation and 5G C-band wireless to safely co-exist."

    5G C-band operates between 3.7-3.98GHz, near the 4.2-4.4GHz band used by radio altimeters that are jolly useful for landing planes in limited visibility. There is or was a fear that these cellular signals, such as from cell towers close to airports, could bleed into the frequencies used by aircraft and cause radio altimeters to display an incorrect reading. C-band technology, which promises faster mobile broadband, was supposed to roll out nationwide on Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile US's networks, but some deployments have been paused near airports due to these concerns. 

    Continue reading
  • IBM settles age discrimination case that sought top execs' emails
    Just days after being ordered to provide messages, Big Blue opts out of public trial

    Less than a week after IBM was ordered in an age discrimination lawsuit to produce internal emails in which its former CEO and former SVP of human resources discuss reducing the number of older workers, the IT giant chose to settle the case for an undisclosed sum rather than proceed to trial next month.

    The order, issued on June 9, in Schenfeld v. IBM, describes Exhibit 10, which "contains emails that discuss the effort taken by IBM to increase the number of 'millennial' employees."

    Plaintiff Eugene Schenfeld, who worked as an IBM research scientist when current CEO Arvind Krishna ran IBM's research group, sued IBM for age discrimination in November, 2018. His claim is one of many that followed a March 2018 report by ProPublica and Mother Jones about a concerted effort to de-age IBM and a 2020 finding by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that IBM executives had directed managers to get rid of older workers to make room for younger ones.

    Continue reading
  • FTC urged to probe Apple, Google for enabling ‘intense system of surveillance’
    Ad tracking poses a privacy and security risk in post-Roe America, lawmakers warn

    Democrat lawmakers want the FTC to investigate Apple and Google's online ad trackers, which they say amount to unfair and deceptive business practices and pose a privacy and security risk to people using the tech giants' mobile devices.

    US Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Cory Booker (D-NJ) and House Representative Sara Jacobs (D-CA) requested on Friday that the watchdog launch a probe into Apple and Google, hours before the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, clearing the way for individual states to ban access to abortions. 

    In the days leading up to the court's action, some of these same lawmakers had also introduced data privacy bills, including a proposal that would make it illegal for data brokers to sell sensitive location and health information of individuals' medical treatment.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022