Reversible head transplants coming back to Windows Server 2016

Sysadmins miss Windows Server 2012's GUI-or-no-GUI-and-back-again option

Microsoft says it might bring back Windows Server 2012's option to run with or without a GUI.

Windows Server 2008 and 2012 offered the chance to install a “Core” version of Windows Server shorn of the Windows desktop's graphical user interface. Server 2008 dropped users straight into a command line. Server 2012 offered a a simple set of BIOS-like menus. Windows Nano Server took things even further by dropping users into PowerShell.

The rationale for GUI-free, or “headless”, operations is that it makes for a smaller disk footprint and attack surface, desirable qualities for any server but especially for virtual machines.

Microsoft recognised that headless operations weren't for everyone, or for all tasks. Windows Server 2012 therefore allowed sysadmins to add or remove the Windows GUI so they could set up a server with a full GUI, administer it with the lighter-weight interface and restore the full GUI if they felt the need to do so.

But that on-off feature went away with Windows Server 2016 and some users seem to be missing it, because Microsoft has now decided to revisit the switching option.

“We have frequently been asked why we removed the option to add and remove the Server GUI package to the Windows Server 2016 Server Core install option like you could in Windows Server 2012 R2,” the company says.

The post we've linked to above goes on to say that the reason for the feature's removal was “one of those challenging functional trade-offs that sometimes need to be made during product development.”

“We prioritized consistency with the Windows client desktop over the ability to switch between Server Core and Server with Desktop. Replacing the legacy desktop in Server with the Windows 10 desktop experience resulted in our inability to support the Windows Server 2012 R2 behavior.”

“It was our belief that consistency was the top priority for Remote Desktop customers, IT Professionals accustomed to having a consistent GUI for server management, and application developers building a consistent experience between client and server.”

Whatever the reason, there's enough grouching out there about the feature's removal that Microsoft has decided to do something about it.

Sadly “something” is about all we can say about Microsoft's plans, as the post concludes by saying “We are working on improvements to the remote management experience to make it easier to operate and manage Server Core without the need to switch back and forth.”

When “something” will arrive and what “something” will do is, for now, known only to Microsoft's development team.

Once they decide what “something” is, we'll let you know. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022