Nvidia says Google's TPU benchmark compared wrong kit

You're faster than the Kepler, but what about the newer and better Pascal?


It's not easy being Nvidia: the rise of AI has put a rocket under demand for GPUs, but the corollary to that is World+Dog publishing benchmarks to try and knock Nvidia off its perch.

The company is famously touchy about such things – witness last year's spat with Intel over benchmarks it didn't regard as fair.

Well, it's happened again, this time with Nvidia taking exception to Google's claims last week to have overtaken everybody else in the field with its Tensor Processing Units.

Had it been competitor Intel, El Reg suspects the return-of-serve would have been made less gently, but The Chocolate Factory is a heavy-hitting Nvidia customer. So before taking issue with Google's claims, Nvidia's blog post starts with a liberal spreading of honey.

After acknowledging Mountain View's “groundbreaking work in deep learning” and patting its own back, Nvidia finally gets to the point: Google's benchmark showed the TPU outperformed its Kepler 80 by thirteen times, “however, it doesn’t compare the TPU to the current generation Pascal-based P40”.

Nvidia compares TPU to GPU

Nvidia's benchmark

“The P40 balances computational precision and throughput, on-chip memory and memory bandwidth to achieve unprecedented performance for training, as well as inferencing.” the post claims.

While the TPU outruns the P40 for inferencing, its memory bandwidth is less than a tenth that of the P40, Nvidia says.

Nvidia isn't the only big name to present its own take on Google's performance claims. Last week, announcing it had taken the Chainer AI framework into its warm embrace, Intel claimed the project made Mountain View's TensorFlow look like it was working in treacle and outlined plans to make Xeons better than GPUs at the data-cruncing required to run AI code. ®


Other stories you might like

  • AMD claims its GPUs beat Nvidia on performance per dollar
    * Terms, conditions, hardware specs and software may vary – a lot

    As a slowdown in PC sales brings down prices for graphics cards, AMD is hoping to win over the market's remaining buyers with a bold, new claim that its latest Radeon cards provide better performance for the dollar than Nvidia's most recent GeForce cards.

    In an image tweeted Monday by AMD's top gaming executive, the chip designer claims its lineup of Radeon RX 6000 cards provide better performance per dollar than competing ones from Nvidia, with all but two of the ten cards listed offering advantages in the double-digit percentages. AMD also claims to provide better performance for the power required by each card in all but two of the cards.

    Continue reading
  • Google opens the pod doors on Bay View campus
    A futuristic design won't make people want to come back – just ask Apple

    After nearly a decade of planning and five years of construction, Google is cutting the ribbon on its Bay View campus, the first that Google itself designed.

    The Bay View campus in Mountain View – slated to open this week – consists of two office buildings (one of which, Charleston East, is still under construction), 20 acres of open space, a 1,000-person event center and 240 short-term accommodations for Google employees. The search giant said the buildings at Bay View total 1.1 million square feet. For reference, that's less than half the size of Apple's spaceship. 

    The roofs on the two main buildings, which look like pavilions roofed in sails, were designed that way for a purpose: They're a network of 90,000 scale-like solar panels nicknamed "dragonscales" for their layout and shimmer. By scaling the tiles, Google said the design minimises damage from wind, rain and snow, and the sloped pavilion-like roof improves solar capture by adding additional curves in the roof. 

    Continue reading
  • Pentester pops open Tesla Model 3 using low-cost Bluetooth module
    Anything that uses proximity-based BLE is vulnerable, claim researchers

    Tesla Model 3 and Y owners, beware: the passive entry feature on your vehicle could potentially be hoodwinked by a relay attack, leading to the theft of the flash motor.

    Discovered and demonstrated by researchers at NCC Group, the technique involves relaying the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) signals from a smartphone that has been paired with a Tesla back to the vehicle. Far from simply unlocking the door, this hack lets a miscreant start the car and drive away, too.

    Essentially, what happens is this: the paired smartphone should be physically close by the Tesla to unlock it. NCC's technique involves one gadget near the paired phone, and another gadget near the car. The phone-side gadget relays signals from the phone to the car-side gadget, which forwards them to the vehicle to unlock and start it. This shouldn't normally happen because the phone and car are so far apart. The car has a defense mechanism – based on measuring transmission latency to detect that a paired device is too far away – that ideally prevents relayed signals from working, though this can be defeated by simply cutting the latency of the relay process.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022