Not auf wiedersehen – yet! The Berlin scene tempting Brexit tech

Nice to Spree you, to Spree you nice


After Britain voted to leave the EU in June 2016, there was a flurry of articles about how London's tech startups, shocked by the prospect of Brexit, could soon decamp to cheap, fun Berlin.

German politicians fed the hype. The Berlin authorities opened a new trade office in London explicitly to capitalise on Brexit uncertainty, while the Free Democratic Party sent a van to drive around Silicon Roundabout emblazoned with the message: "Dear startups, keep calm and move to Berlin."

So far, though, there have been more articles written about startups moving from London to Berlin than companies that have actually done so.

The city authorities said in November just five companies (all small) had made the jump. Since then, no more have come, a spokeswoman told The Register.

Travis Todd, chief executive of Silicon Allee, a Berlin startup community, distilled the inertia. "What's overlooked in this discussion is that these are not just companies, they're companies full of people, and people have families and children and houses and everything. So despite the political climate, no major startup or company is going to disrupt their entire workforce."

That said, with Article 50 triggered and Britain's exit from the EU now less than two years away, Berlin's authorities say that many companies are still interested – just biding their time, waiting to see what happens in the negotiations.

Rather than causing existing companies to move, Todd thinks that the real impact of Brexit may be on founders, who now may be having second thoughts about setting up in London. With that in mind, what does Berlin offer them?

Why business likes the EU

The obvious answer is seamless access to European markets in a post-Brexit world. "We offer a new home to British companies which want to keep close ties to the EU," says Ramona Pop, Berlin's senator for economics, energy and public enterprises. "The same applies for international companies originally planning to move to the UK and now looking for a new business location."

Brexit will also likely stop London-based startups recruiting EU citizens with zero visa hassle. Germany already has a much easier and cheaper immigration regime compared to the UK for firms that want to bring people in from outside the EU.

In the UK, companies that want to sponsor employees from outside the EU need a licence, which comes with all kinds of responsibilities like tracking workers' attendance. As of April, companies need to pay an extra £364 per worker annually, (rising to £1,000 a year if they grow beyond 50 employees) as an incentive for companies to train up British workers. For employees themselves, a UK working visa costs more than £400 (€477), but for Germany it's £50 (€60).

Nick Franklin, a Brit who had worked in east Asia for customer service software company Zendesk, had to decide where to set up his own firm: London or Berlin?

The tipping points for Berlin were cost and visas. "Those were really the only two things," he told The Reg – he'd already rejected Silicon Valley earlier, due to visa logistics and expenses.

Since then, Franklin's subscriptions analytics company Chartmogul, based in Berlin's central Mitte district, has sponsored numerous employees from outside the EU (the firm of 22 people contains 15 nationalities). "We never had any issues with it – it's free for the company," he says. "And it's really fast."

The result? Plenty of people are moving to Germany and Berlin: since 2011, the city has grown by nearly 50,000 people a year as economic growth has picked up and unemployment fallen, mirroring Germany's wider industrial success story.

Sounds great, but costs are rising

"In Germany, we have a strong industry sector – much stronger than in the UK," which is excellent for business-to-business startups, says Stefan Franzke, co-chief executive of Berlin Partner, an agency that helps companies launch and grow in the city. Titans of the German economy – including Siemens, Lufthansa, Deutsche Bahn, and Mercedes "want to digitise their established product, and for this change, you need talent and startups," he adds.

The amount of venture capital flowing into Berlin has exploded over the last five years, according to KPMG. In 2016, it attracted $1bn of investment, compared to $3.1bn in London (which has roughly two and a half times the population).

But this influx of people and money is chipping away at one of Berlin's key advantages: cost. According to a 2016 report by Knight Frank, prime office space in the city is about 70 per cent cheaper than in London. But then property firm JLL says rents are rising by around 15 per cent a year. A one-bedroom flat in Berlin's city centre costs around £600 a month, compared to nearly £1,700 in London, says the price crowdsourcing site Numbeo, but rents have been rising swiftly. They jumped 7 per cent in 2016, according to analysis by Deutsche Bank.

Perhaps because they are aware of these trend lines, those promoting the city play down the idea that Berlin is a cheap place to set up. "This is not the most important advantage," says Franzke. Cheap rents are "like a present," he says – a nice bonus, but not a core reason to move. Yet others in the startup scene mutter privately that cost is still the city's trump card as it enables startups to lure in young, relatively cheap workers.

For some tech founders in Berlin, a bigger problem than rising rents is the hassle of finding a place to live. "Every apartment you go for there can be 20 people queued up outside," Franklin says.

It takes Chartmogul's new employees "a couple of months" to find somewhere permanent, he warns. "A lot of people book an Airbnb for a month... and then they realise they need two months."

Alongside the struggle to find a flat, Berlin founders also warn of an initial "sticker shock" from German bureaucracy.

It takes about a month to set up a company, and they need relatively large amounts of founding capital, Todd says. There are other problems: "Ninety per cent of startups fail, and it takes a minimum of a year to shut down a company in Berlin, and that doesn't give entrepreneurs the feel-good feeling that they want to start another company."

Others complain about how difficult it is to use credit cards in Berlin.

Throwing money around

But in compensation for these irritations, there are plenty of state-backed carrots to help startups grow. Investitionsbank Berlin – a business development bank – offers 13 different types of assistance to founders, generally different types of loans.

Isaac Ashdown, a British programmer who co-founded inbetweengames in 2015, managed to win an interest-free loan for €70,000 (£58,669) from Berlin's Medienboard – another organisation that offers assistance to game, film and virtual reality firms – to fund half of a project to create a noir game set in a futuristic Berlin (where the Cold War is still raging). The application took about two months, as did the decision. "I'd definitely recommend it, but it would be difficult if you didn't have a German speaker," he says.

As for Berlin's working culture, there is little of the 100-hour week machismo that afflicts some in Silicon Valley; offices tend to be extremely international and people start and finish work a little later than in London. "Berlin's a later-skewing city in general," says Ashdown. "There's not this rush to get drunk before the pubs shut."

But Berlin's tech scene seems just as male-dominated as in any other city, and maybe less conscious of this. "Berlin is the only place where I've been to a tech conference which has an entirely white male panel," says one tech founder who preferred to remain anonymous. In London and San Francisco, the industry is much more conscious of its demographic skew, he says.

Berlin, then, is no startup paradise. If it was, Germany's capital would have won out over London even without the prospect of leaving the EU. Brexit, however, could tip the balance in its favour – just don't expect the shift to happen overnight. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Florida's content-moderation law kept on ice, likely unconstitutional, court says
    So cool you're into free speech because that includes taking down misinformation

    While the US Supreme Court considers an emergency petition to reinstate a preliminary injunction against Texas' social media law HB 20, the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday partially upheld a similar injunction against Florida's social media law, SB 7072.

    Both Florida and Texas last year passed laws that impose content moderation restrictions, editorial disclosure obligations, and user-data access requirements on large online social networks. The Republican governors of both states justified the laws by claiming that social media sites have been trying to censor conservative voices, an allegation that has not been supported by evidence.

    Multiple studies addressing this issue say right-wing folk aren't being censored. They have found that social media sites try to take down or block misinformation, which researchers say is more common from right-leaning sources.

    Continue reading
  • US-APAC trade deal leaves out Taiwan, military defense not ruled out
    All fun and games until the chip factories are in the crosshairs

    US President Joe Biden has heralded an Indo-Pacific trade deal signed by several nations that do not include Taiwan. At the same time, Biden warned China that America would help defend Taiwan from attack; it is home to a critical slice of the global chip industry, after all. 

    The agreement, known as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is still in its infancy, with today's announcement enabling the United States and the other 12 participating countries to begin negotiating "rules of the road that ensure [US businesses] can compete in the Indo-Pacific," the White House said. 

    Along with America, other IPEF signatories are Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Combined, the White House said, the 13 countries participating in the IPEF make up 40 percent of the global economy. 

    Continue reading
  • 381,000-plus Kubernetes API servers 'exposed to internet'
    Firewall isn't a made-up word from the Hackers movie, people

    A large number of servers running the Kubernetes API have been left exposed to the internet, which is not great: they're potentially vulnerable to abuse.

    Nonprofit security organization The Shadowserver Foundation recently scanned 454,729 systems hosting the popular open-source platform for managing and orchestrating containers, finding that more than 381,645 – or about 84 percent – are accessible via the internet to varying degrees thus providing a cracked door into a corporate network.

    "While this does not mean that these instances are fully open or vulnerable to an attack, it is likely that this level of access was not intended and these instances are an unnecessarily exposed attack surface," Shadowserver's team stressed in a write-up. "They also allow for information leakage on version and build."

    Continue reading
  • A peek into Gigabyte's GPU Arm for AI, HPC shops
    High-performance platform choices are going beyond the ubiquitous x86 standard

    Arm-based servers continue to gain momentum with Gigabyte Technology introducing a system based on Ampere's Altra processors paired with Nvidia A100 GPUs, aimed at demanding workloads such as AI training and high-performance compute (HPC) applications.

    The G492-PD0 runs either an Ampere Altra or Altra Max processor, the latter delivering 128 64-bit cores that are compatible with the Armv8.2 architecture.

    It supports 16 DDR4 DIMM slots, which would be enough space for up to 4TB of memory if all slots were filled with 256GB memory modules. The chassis also has space for no fewer than eight Nvidia A100 GPUs, which would make for a costly but very powerful system for those workloads that benefit from GPU acceleration.

    Continue reading
  • GitLab version 15 goes big on visibility and observability
    GitOps fans can take a spin on the free tier for pull-based deployment

    One-stop DevOps shop GitLab has announced version 15 of its platform, hot on the heels of pull-based GitOps turning up on the platform's free tier.

    Version 15.0 marks the arrival of GitLab's next major iteration and attention this time around has turned to visibility and observability – hardly surprising considering the acquisition of OpsTrace as 2021 drew to a close, as well as workflow automation, security and compliance.

    GitLab puts out monthly releases –  hitting 15.1 on June 22 –  and we spoke to the company's senior director of Product, Kenny Johnston, at the recent Kubecon EU event, about what will be added to version 15 as time goes by. During a chat with the company's senior director of Product, Kenny Johnston, at the recent Kubecon EU event, The Register was told that this was more where dollars were being invested into the product.

    Continue reading
  • To multicloud, or not: Former PayPal head of engineering weighs in
    Not everyone needs it, but those who do need to consider 3 things, says Asim Razzaq

    The push is on to get every enterprise thinking they're missing out on the next big thing if they don't adopt a multicloud strategy.

    That shove in the multicloud direction appears to be working. More than 75 percent of businesses are now using multiple cloud providers, according to Gartner. That includes some big companies, like Boeing, which recently chose to spread its bets across AWS, Google Cloud and Azure as it continues to eliminate old legacy systems. 

    There are plenty of reasons to choose to go with multiple cloud providers, but Asim Razzaq, CEO and founder at cloud cost management company Yotascale, told The Register that choosing whether or not to invest in a multicloud architecture all comes down to three things: How many different compute needs a business has, budget, and the need for redundancy. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022