Irish Stripe techie denied entry to US – for having wrong stamp in passport

Snub says more about misunderstanding rules than anti-immigrant trends, though


An Irish Stripe worker was denied entry to America because they had a Somalian stamp in their passport, according to the payment-processing biz's CEO.

Chief exec Patrick Collison shared the tale of his employee's clash with US immigration officials to highlight a concern, shared among many in Silicon Valley who rely on skilled staff from abroad, that America's crackdown on foreigners will dent the superpower's economy.

"US immigration policy changes are somewhat broader in scope than they might appear," chief exec Patrick Collison tweeted on Monday. "Any erosion to the US's reputation as the preeminent destination for high-potential people will be very costly."

Collison included a screenshot of a message from a Stripe employee and citizen of Ireland who recounted being denied entry to the US recently. The Register asked Stripe by phone and email for further information about Collison's post, but the company didn't want to talk about it. We also attempted to contact to the person we suspect to be the post's author, but have not heard back.

The unidentified would-be traveler expressed gratitude for an earlier note sent around, presumably by Collison, that conveyed sympathy about the travel ban that the Trump administration has been trying to implement.

The individual described being denied the opportunity to fly to San Francisco, stating, "At pre-clearance, they [immigration authorities] decided to question and intimidate me... fun! They told me I had a common name and it was a match ... and they wanted to see if I was the person they were looking for..."

The account continues, "They said they weren't letting me in because of my Somali [passport] stamp and relied on some newly enforced ban on having been in one of 'the seven countries' post-2011 ... I spent two days in Somalia with my NGO as part of a UN mission doing famine response in 2012."

The seven countries mentioned – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen – have predominantly Muslim populations, and show up in the first proposed Trump travel ban. The current travel ban proposal, facing judicial review, omits Iraq, for diplomatic reasons.

The internet bites back

Indignation followed in the replies to Collison's post on Twitter, with one person concluding that the Trump administration has begun targeting Somalia-based NGO workers.

But in the response thread, several individuals, including an immigration attorney, dispelled that misapprehension. The changes that so concern Collison hail from rules implemented during the Obama administration.

As a result of policy amendments conceived in 2015 (HR 158, The Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015) and implemented in 2016, the State Department's Visa Waiver Program (VWP), which allows people from 38 participating countries to travel to the US without a visa, now excludes individuals who visited any of the seven listed countries on or after March 1, 2011.

Travel for diplomatic or military purposes may qualify for an exception, but famine relief work does not.

It is thus unsurprising that a traveler from Ireland, one of the participating VWP countries, who visited Somalia cannot take advantage of the VWP. He or she can still travel to the US if granted a visa.

Such problems were foreseen by the ACLU. In December, 2015, the rights group sent a letter [PDF] to members of Congress condemning HR 158 – which initially affected only nationals of Iraq, Syria, Iran, or Sudan – as discriminatory and arbitrary legislation.

Beyond falling afoul of VWP rules, it appears to us that this incident has more to do with discrimination based on the traveler's name and ethnic background than newly hostile government policies. Collison's post highlights the fact that the Stripe employee is an Irish citizen. But were you to assume the individual in question is a blond-haired, blue-eyed white man, you might be mistaken.

If our speculation about the individual's identity is correct, the person's name – more commonly associated with the Middle East than Ireland – may be what brought extra attention from authorities in the first place.

In an email to The Register, a spokesperson for US Customs & Border Protection said without knowing the individual's identity, it's difficult to look into what happened. But she confirmed that policies limiting visa-free travel to the US have been in place for a while.

"On December 18, 2015, President Obama signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, which includes the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 (the Act)," the CBP spokesperson said. "The Act, among other things, establishes new eligibility requirements for travel under the VWP.

"These new eligibility requirements do not bar travel to the United States. Instead, a traveler who does not meet the requirements must obtain a visa for travel to the United States, which generally includes an in-person interview at a US Embassy or Consulate." ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021