It's a question worth asking: Why is the FCC boss being such a jerk?

The answer – because net-neutrality slayer Ajit Pai wants to stay in charge

Not all bad, though

Which is a shame because Pai had identified a lot of the issues with the FCC, particularly its outdated procedures. He railed, quite correctly, about the ludicrous situation where people were unable to see FCC rules until after they had been approved.

He also flagged the ridiculous situation where even after they had been approved, the FCC chair can make changes to them. And he noted, with one eyebrow raised heavily, that there had been a very significant change to the net neutrality rules at the last minute that appears to be solely in response to a letter sent to the FCC from a "very large California company."

He was referring to Google, which had managed to use its eerily close relationship to the White House to extend its tentacles into every part of the federal government.

Despite there being strict rules about what the FCC and its staff were allowed to share outside the regulator, it was abundantly clear from the letter that Google's policy team had got hold of some very detailed information. It smacked of special treatment.

Pai's colleague Mike O'Rielly was also flagging problems with how the FCC was run, but was repeatedly hitting a brick wall of staff obfuscation. Both were being frozen out, and Pai started complaining that Wheeler wasn't even bothering to pretend he was considering Pai's and O'Rielly's legitimate policy concerns, but just plowed ahead knowing he had the votes to pass it regardless.

Aside from a few stage-managed efforts to show that the FCC Commissioners were getting on just fine, the federal regulator had been sucked into partisan politics and all the hyperbole and pontificating that comes with it.

And then the election happened.

Welcome President Trump

Pretty much everyone in Washington assumed that Hillary Clinton was going to become president. And that meant that things would have stayed largely the same at the FCC.

Republicans had been blocking the reappointment of Jessica Rosenworcel as a Democratic FCC commissioner for pure politics – she was a very qualified and highly respected. The Republicans also wanted to force Tom Wheeler out of his job as chairman of the FCC.

With Clinton in charge, she would have probably got Rosenworcel back into the regulator, and named a new chairman, and the watchdog's ruling committee would have settled into a 3-2 Democrat majority.

As for Pai: his term actually expired in June 2016, although he is able to stay on the FCC until the end of 2017, at which point he needs Senate confirmation. The Democrats would almost certainly have refused to reappoint him because of his partisan comments. And net neutrality – already backed up by the courts – would have remained in place.

But then Trump won.

Having debated whether to refuse to stand down and simply stay on at the FCC to block any efforts to overturn his earlier decisions, Tom Wheeler finally decided that he would follow tradition and leave when the new administration took over.

And then there were three

That left Pai, O'Rielly and Democrat Mignon Clyburn on the FCC. And no decision as to who would be chair.

Pai desperately wanted the chairmanship, and so in his bid to get the role started adopting Trumpisms: furious denunciations combined with "I alone can fix this" exclamations of problems and his solutions.

And it worked. Three days after his inauguration, President Trump was persuaded by his FCC advisors to select Ajit Pai as permanent chair, rather than give him a temporary title or name a new chair.

It was an easy call in the end: Pai had made big play about wanting to kill off net neutrality, he has displayed both aggressive partisanship and a willingness to tear things up, but most usefully, it meant Trump could simply move on to other things because the Republicans had a 2-1 majority.

But Pai's time on the FCC will end at the end of this year unless he can do two things: get Trump's approval for his reappointment, and get the Senate to approve his candidacy.

It is an enormous fork in Pai's career and life.

If he can go down one path, he becomes chair of a powerful federal regulator for the next five years and from there he can leave to become a massively well-paid lobbyist, quite possibly the next head of the cable industry's main lobbying body.

If he goes down the other path, he is a short-term FCC chair, booted off in less than a year and having to negotiate his way back into a law firm or the legal department of a big telco.

Next page: Dear Donald...

Other stories you might like

  • Drone ship carrying yet more drones launches in China
    Zhuhai Cloud will carry 50 flying and diving machines it can control with minimal human assistance

    Chinese academics have christened an ocean research vessel that has a twist: it will sail the seas with a complement of aerial and ocean-going drones and no human crew.

    The Zhu Hai Yun, or Zhuhai Cloud, launched in Guangzhou after a year of construction. The 290-foot-long mothership can hit a top speed of 18 knots (about 20 miles per hour) and will carry 50 flying, surface, and submersible drones that launch and self-recover autonomously. 

    According to this blurb from the shipbuilder behind its construction, the Cloud will also be equipped with a variety of additional observational instruments "which can be deployed in batches in the target sea area, and carry out task-oriented adaptive networking to achieve three-dimensional view of specific targets." Most of the ship is an open deck where flying drones can land and be stored. The ship is also equipped with launch and recovery equipment for its aquatic craft. 

    Continue reading
  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022