Intel, Samsung join Apple, FTC firing squad against rival Qualcomm

Two more chip heavyweights enter the patent fray

Add Intel and Samsung to the mix of companies siding against Qualcomm in its battle with US trade watchdog the FTC over alleged dodgy patent licensing.

The two tech giants filed amicus briefs with the Northern California District Court on Friday supporting the American regulator in its crackdown on Qualy, and urged Judge Lucy Koh to reject Qualcomm's motion to dismiss the probe. The FTC has sued Qualcomm in January alleging it illegally demanded its customers pay licensing fees for patented technology they did not actually use.

In their briefs, both Samsung [PDF] and Intel [PDF] say that they have seen first-hand how Qualcomm's alleged policies have harmed competition in the market by walling off competitors. Samsung and Intel are, by the way, fierce rivals with Qualcomm: the latter's Snapdragon line competes with Samsung's mobile and Intel's laptop chips, and its Centriq family is gunning for Intel's server sales.

"The FTC's allegations of anticompetitive conduct reflect the reality that Intel has experienced in the marketplace," said Chipzilla, whose LTE business also competes directly with Qualcomm in the wireless broadband market.

"Further proceedings in this case will shed much-needed light on Qualcomm's abusive practices and the harms those practices inflict on the competitive process and on consumers."

Among the accusations leveled at Qualcomm is misuse of standard-essential patents (SEPs). Normally, when patents are vital to a technology standard, the owner will agree to offer licensing to all comers (including potential competitors) under a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) pricing policy.

According to Samsung, Qualcomm has not been holding up its FRAND obligations, instead telling hardware vendors they must agree to exclusivity deals in order to get licensing rights.

"Qualcomm has not upheld its end of the bargain: Despite declaring thousands of SEPs, Qualcomm altogether refuses to license SEPs to rival chipset manufacturers, instead licensing only handset manufacturers," Samsung writes.

"Qualcomm then leverages and solidifies this market power by charging a 'tax' to handset manufacturers that further cements its monopoly power by imposing terms that significantly diminish demand for competing chipsets. And because Qualcomm does not license competitors, handset manufacturers have no choice but to accept Qualcomm's onerous terms. In short, Qualcomm directly excludes competitors and harms competition."

Samsung and Intel join an increasingly impressive roster of companies who take issue with Qualcomm's patent dealings. Apple has charged that Qualcomm's unfair licensing terms led to it overpaying suppliers to the tune of $1bn. And the FTC legal challenge specifically accuses Qualcomm of screwing over Apple in chip tech licensing. ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Samsung and Intel bosses discuss silicon cooperation
    Details? Nope. Potential? Enormous.

    Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger and Samsung Electronics boss Lee Jae-yong met on Monday in South Korea and “discussed how to cooperate between the two companies."

    That quote comes from Samsung, which also let the world know the two leaders talked about next-generation memory chips, silicon for PCs and mobile devices, fabless chip design, the foundry business, and more.

    It is unclear if the talks addressed a particular issue, or just represented the heads of the world’s top two chipmakers getting together for a chat while Gelsinger was in town.

    Continue reading
  • Intel demands $625m in interest from Europe on overturned antitrust fine
    Chip giant still salty

    Having successfully appealed Europe's €1.06bn ($1.2bn) antitrust fine, Intel now wants €593m ($623.5m) in interest charges.

    In January, after years of contesting the fine, the x86 chip giant finally overturned the penalty, and was told it didn't have to pay up after all. The US tech titan isn't stopping there, however, and now says it is effectively seeking damages for being screwed around by Brussels.

    According to official documents [PDF] published on Monday, Intel has gone to the EU General Court for “payment of compensation and consequential interest for the damage sustained because of the European Commissions refusal to pay Intel default interest."

    Continue reading
  • Intel says Sapphire Rapids CPU delay will help AMD catch up
    Our window to have leading server chips again is narrowing, exec admits

    While Intel has bagged Nvidia as a marquee customer for its next-generation Xeon Scalable processor, the x86 giant has admitted that a broader rollout of the server chip has been delayed to later this year.

    Sandra Rivera, Intel's datacenter boss, confirmed the delay of the Xeon processor, code-named Sapphire Rapids, in a Tuesday panel discussion at the BofA Securities 2022 Global Technology Conference. Earlier that day at the same event, Nvidia's CEO disclosed that the GPU giant would use Sapphire Rapids, and not AMD's upcoming Genoa chip, for its flagship DGX H100 system, a reversal from its last-generation machine.

    Intel has been hyping up Sapphire Rapids as a next-generation Xeon CPU that will help the chipmaker become more competitive after falling behind AMD in technology over the past few years. In fact, Intel hopes it will beat AMD's next-generation Epyc chip, Genoa, to the market with industry-first support for new technologies such as DDR5, PCIe Gen 5 and Compute Express Link.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022