Plutus Payroll clients and staff fell for plausible business model fairy tales

Free payroll service claimed to make money with commissions and short term loans

Fallen Australian payroll-services-for-contractors company Plutus Payroll convinced clients and staff that it had hit upon a business model that let it fund free payroll services with clever money market plays, commission deals with financial services companies and by selling workers' details to marketers.

But those revenue sources appear to have been a fantasy as Plutus has since been named as a vehicle used to perpetrate an AU$165m (US$122.5m, £94.5m) tax fraud scheme.

The Register has today spoken with several tech contractors who used Plutus for its payroll services. All requested anonymity, as they did not wish to be named now the case has become so prominent.

Most said that Plutus was attractive because it charged no fees compared to the 2.5 per cent of salary typically charged by payroll providers. Contractors told us that Plutus did a really good job - they were paid on time and the company had an excellent reputation in the industry. Several contractors told us they signed up after friends and colleagues raved about Plutus' service.

Plutus also put money in their pockets. One contractor told us she received a pre-paid credit card loaded with AU$100 for every month she stayed with the company. Such largesse suggested a thriving company.

Other contractors were given free or heavily-discounted private health insurance, saving them hundreds of dollars a month. Plutus also introduced its clients to financial services companies that helped customers to create salary packages that included leased cars. The Register has seen a Plutus client's pay slip that includes a salary sacrifice scheme for a new Apple Mac.

Such salary packaging is a staple of the industry and the contractors we spoke to said they saw Plutus' ability to organise leases or insurance as a sign of its competence and bona fides.

A few of the contractors El Reg contacted said they did pause to wonder if Plutus was perhaps a bit too good to be true and asked the company how it was able to offer free services. Plutus staff would explain that the company received commissions from financial services companies and would also on-sell their data to third parties and that they could expect to receive offers from marketers. Commissions of this type are common in Australia and as tech contractors can earn very good wages down under it's entirely conceivable that marketers would clamour for their contact details.

An email from a Plutus Payroll worker to a prospect

An email a Plutus Payroll worker sent to a contractor, explaining the benefits the company offered

None of the contractors we spoke to ever received any approaches by marketers, but none smelled a rat – perhaps because who notices the absence of spammy email or cold calls?

Those we spoke to generally said that once Plutus explained its business model, it sounded plausible at a time when businesses can seemingly thrive by funnelling referrals to insurance companies, affiliate marketing or providing data to enhance online advertising. That Plutus offered a no-nonsense service, delivered by pleasant and responsive people, completed the picture of a dare-we-say-it disruptive business that looked to have found a way to shake up Australia's payroll industry.

The view from inside Plutus

Staff were told similar stories of Plutus' clever methods of making money. The company's executives told Tim Munk, formerly Plutus' general manager of contractor care, that commissions from financial services partners were one revenue stream. He was also told that Plutus had found a cunning way to manage its cash flow so that it would receive wages owed to its clients and lend that money on the short-term money market at very high interest rates. Plutus would get that money back before it was due to make payments to contractors.

Short-term lending of this sort is not unusual: plenty of companies hit cash flow crunches and specialist lenders are eager to help. To Munk and other staff Plutus looked clever and credible.

Recruitment companies liked the story too, because Plutus paid them referral fees. Even recruiters that had their own payroll services organisations sent people Plutus' way.

Some of the contractors The Register has contacted allege that individual recruiters may have fibbed and said Plutus was contractors' only option. Munk says Plutus went out of its way not to mention the incentive scheme to recruitment companies that forbid such payments. But The Register understands individual recruitment agents stood to earn $1,000 per referral to Plutus, a tempting sum.

Munk told El Reg that from his vantage point, Plutus was performing well in mid-2016. He learned the company was to be taken over by Synep, the company alleged to have been the entity behind the tax fraud. Around the time of the Synep takeover Plutus' CEO left and Munk was given greater discretion on how to run the company. He was then dismissed in March 2017 on grounds that Plutus needed to cut costs.

Within two months Plutus' bank accounts had been frozen, contractors' pays stopped flowing and the mess we've chronicled since May 1st started to unfurl.

Loose ends

At the time of writing ten people are due in court over the alleged tax scam and many contractors are fearful for their futures.

Some contractors tell us they are still owed wages, despite Plutus promising to pay them. Some were overpaid and now tell us that all of their wages have disappeared from their bank accounts. Others tell us that just the right amount remains. Some still have too much money and expect terse letters from banks.

Many are worried that Plutus will not be able to issue correct tax documentation, a reasonably urgent matter given that Australia's financial year ends on June 30.

Some of those we've contacted also want to know why their recruitment companies introduced them to Plutus. The Register has contacted three recruitment companies known to have referred contractors to Plutus. All declined to comment.

The Register has created an early warning mailing list for affected contractors: if we learn any new information we'll send it to that list before we post a story. If you're a former Plutus contractor write to me if you'd like to be included on that list.

We're continuing to pursue this story with the Australian Taxation Office and recruitment companies. And we'll try to get to court in-between covering other stories. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Samsung fined $14 million for misleading smartphone water resistance claims
    Promoted phones as ready for a dunking – forgot to mention known problems with subsequent recharges

    Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission has fined Samsung Electronics AU$14 million ($9.6 million) for making for misleading water resistance claims about 3.1 million smartphones.

    The Commission (ACCC) says that between 2016 and 2018 Samsung advertised its Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, A5, A7, S8, S8 Plus and Note 8 smartphones as capable of surviving short submersions in the sea or fresh water.

    As it happens The Register attended the Australian launch of the Note 8 and watched on in wonder as it survived a brief dunking and bubbles appeared to emerge from within the device. Your correspondent recalls Samsung claiming that the waterproofing reflected the aim of designing a phone that could handle Australia's outdoors lifestyle.

    Continue reading
  • Five Eyes alliance’s top cop says techies are the future of law enforcement
    Crims have weaponized tech and certain States let them launder the proceeds

    Australian Federal Police (AFP) commissioner Reece Kershaw has accused un-named nations of helping organized criminals to use technology to commit and launder the proceeds of crime, and called for international collaboration to developer technologies that counter the threats that behaviour creates.

    Kershaw’s remarks were made at a meeting of the Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group (FELEG), the forum in which members of the Five Eyes intelligence sharing pact – Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the UK and the USA – discuss policing and related matters. Kershaw is the current chair of FELEG.

    “Criminals have weaponized technology and have become ruthlessly efficient at finding victims,” Kerhsaw told the group, before adding : “State actors and citizens from some nations are using our countries at the expense of our sovereignty and economies.”

    Continue reading
  • Police lab wants your happy childhood pictures to train AI to detect child abuse
    Like the Hotdog, Not Hotdog app but more Kidnapped, Not Kidnapped

    Updated Australia's federal police and Monash University are asking netizens to send in snaps of their younger selves to train a machine-learning algorithm to spot child abuse in photographs.

    Researchers are looking to collect images of people aged 17 and under in safe scenarios; they don't want any nudity, even if it's a relatively innocuous picture like a child taking a bath. The crowdsourcing campaign, dubbed My Pictures Matter, is open to those aged 18 and above, who can consent to having their photographs be used for research purposes.

    All the images will be amassed into a dataset managed by Monash academics in an attempt to train an AI model to tell the difference between a minor in a normal environment and an exploitative, unsafe situation. The software could, in theory, help law enforcement better automatically and rapidly pinpoint child sex abuse material (aka CSAM) in among thousands upon thousands of photographs under investigation, avoiding having human analysts inspect every single snap.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022