Google to give 6 months' warning for 2018 Chrome adblockalypse – report

Hang on, you're checking non-Google ads with what now?

Publishers will get a six-month headsup before Google kills intrusive advertising on Chrome, sources close to the ad giant have reportedly said.

Google will also hand online publishers a special tool to make sure that their ads are "compliant", the firm blogged yesterday. It will be called "Ad Experience Reports" – ostensibly to be based on the recommendations of industry group the Coalition for Better Ads, of which Facebook and Google are members.

It's going to be good news for many Chrome users as some of the worst ad offenders have made the CBA's "unacceptable" list, which was released in March. We're talking pop-ups, auto-playing sound-on video ads and – everybody's least favourite – the "prestitial" ads which annoyingly count down from 20 or 300 or 10 (or whatever amount of time you don't have to waste) before letting you read what you went there to read.

And for online publishers, the process will be simple; page content will merely be checked with Google's tool and then those publishers will be able to tell whether they're allowed to run ads that are not Google's... well, you see the problem.

Alphabet's Google is not just the world's dominant online advertiser – along with Facebook, it controls "99 per cent" of new digital ad cash – it also owns, in Chrome, its dominant web browser.

Of course, as The Reg previously pointed out here, an "ad-blocker in a dominant browser could mean the world's dominant ad network could be filtering out rival ad networks, which has competition implications".

EU's Competition Commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, has said that the Commission will "follow this new feature and its effects closely".

The Reg's own operations manager, Matt Proud, said:

"I'm not keen on Google being the arbiter of what constitutes good or bad advertising... Who's to say they won't be more lenient with their own demand sources vs their rivals?

"I'd be more concerned if I were in charge of advertising on a porn site or gambling site, where intrusive ads are par for the course, and presumably a necessity for survival. Though they have lots of experience of circumventing such things, and I imagine this will be no different."

Using your own ad-blocker? You'll have to pay...

Google will also allow publishers to charge users who use ad-blockers – hitting Adblock Plus-maker Eyeo where it hurts – via "funding choices", which will allow publishers to set a "price per page view" for ad-block-using consumers to pay. ®

* The maker of Adblock Plus

Other stories you might like

  • I was fired for blowing the whistle on cult's status in Google unit, says contractor
    The internet giant, a doomsday religious sect, and a lawsuit in Silicon Valley

    A former Google video producer has sued the internet giant alleging he was unfairly fired for blowing the whistle on a religious sect that had all but taken over his business unit. 

    The lawsuit demands a jury trial and financial restitution for "religious discrimination, wrongful termination, retaliation and related causes of action." It alleges Peter Lubbers, director of the Google Developer Studio (GDS) film group in which 34-year-old plaintiff Kevin Lloyd worked, is not only a member of The Fellowship of Friends, the exec was influential in growing the studio into a team that, in essence, funneled money back to the fellowship.

    In his complaint [PDF], filed in a California Superior Court in Silicon Valley, Lloyd lays down a case that he was fired for expressing concerns over the fellowship's influence at Google, specifically in the GDS. When these concerns were reported to a manager, Lloyd was told to drop the issue or risk losing his job, it is claimed. 

    Continue reading
  • UK competition watchdog seeks to make mobile browsers, cloud gaming and payments more competitive
    Investigation could help end WebKit monoculture on iOS devices

    The United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on Friday said it intends to launch an investigation of Apple's and Google's market power with respect to mobile browsers and cloud gaming, and to take enforcement action against Google for its app store payment practices.

    "When it comes to how people use mobile phones, Apple and Google hold all the cards," said Andrea Coscelli, Chief Executive of the CMA, in a statement. "As good as many of their services and products are, their strong grip on mobile ecosystems allows them to shut out competitors, holding back the British tech sector and limiting choice."

    The decision to open a formal investigation follows the CMA's year-long study of the mobile ecosystem. The competition watchdog's findings have been published in a report that concludes Apple and Google have a duopoly that limits competition.

    Continue reading
  • Google offers $118m to settle gender discrimination lawsuit
    Don't even think about putting LaMDA on the compensation committee

    Google has promised to cough up $118 million to settle a years-long gender-discrimination class-action lawsuit that alleged the internet giant unfairly pays men more than women.

    The case, launched in 2017, was led by three women, Kelly Ellis, Holly Pease, and Kelli Wisuri, who filed a complaint alleging the search giant hires women in lower-paying positions compared to men despite them having the same qualifications. Female staff are also less likely to get promoted, it was claimed.

    Gender discrimination also exists within the same job tier, too, the complaint stated. Google was accused of paying women less than their male counterparts despite them doing the same work. The lawsuit was later upgraded to a class-action status when a fourth woman, Heidi Lamar, joined as a plaintiff. The class is said to cover more than 15,000 people.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022