Gear, racks, software hacks – what the cluster kids are rockin' at ISC17

Students show all at Frankfurt HPC showdown

HPC Blog The tension is rising at the ISC17 Student Cluster Competition being held this week in Frankfurt, Germany. Eleven university teams are vying for the coveted Ultimate Champion award, the Highest LINPACK award, and the Fan Favourite Prize.

I know that everyone is closely following these competitions, but just a few words to the people who aren't: get on the bandwagon. This is like college football for nerds, it's compelling competition, it's fun, it's sciencey, and it features huge computers – what's not to like?

These kids have been working for months to design their clusters, learn the applications, and learn how to tune the apps for head-spinning performance. The only constraint they have, and it's a biggie, is that their hardware can't consume more than 3,000W at any time during the competition.

What's always surprising about these competitions is the creativity of the students in how they design their clusters. As you can see on the chart below, there's quite a bit of difference between the teams in terms of their approach.

On the small side, we have Team UMass with the smallest cluster possible – one node – although they have a brace of NVIDIA Jetsons to provide a low-power punch to their system. We have a few teams coming in with two and three nodes, but jam-packed with NVIDIA P100 GPUs.

For the first time we're seeing the new motherboards that support two CPUs but a shocking eight full-size GPUs on the same board. Purdue/NEU and FAU are using these boards and looking to ride them into the upper echelon of the competition.

I'm usually in the school of thought that says "more gear, more better", but maybe this eight-GPUs-per-node configuration is too much of a good thing. At some point those GPUs are going to saturate the PCIe bus and chaos will ensue.

It reminds me of the old "coffee table of doom" behemoth we saw at one of the earlier competitions. One of the German teams brought a row of towers that each had two Intel Phi and NVIDIA K40 GPUs – for a grand total of 16 accelerators. When they fired that bad boy up, I swear that the lights in the hall dimmed.

Nanyang, the pride of Singapore, is also running a two-node cluster, but with a more modest eight GPUs. This is a team that has been steadily improving in these competitions, and I predict that they're going to have a breakthrough into the upper tier of competitors soon.

EPCC from Edinburgh is sporting a three-node, liquid-cooled cluster with nine GPUs, and they're hoping to recapture the LINPACK crown, as they did a couple of competitions ago.

Spain's UPC team, backed by the Barcelona Supercomputer Center, has brought a beefy ARM-fuelled rig that has a whopping 768 ARM cores and over 2TB of memory.

University of Hamburg, one of two German teams at this year's competition, is driving an Intel KNL platform with ten one-socket nodes providing 680 compute cores.

The US team from NERSC has eschewed any accelerator in favour of a six-node tradition CPU-based cluster. While this won't capture the LINPACK trophy, it's a solid machine and should do well for them.

Beihang University from China is looking to improve upon their second place finish at the recently concluded Asian Student Cluster competition, and is running their five-node cluster equipped with 10 P100 accelerators.

The two most lauded teams, China's Tsinghua and South Africa's CHPC, have nearly the same cluster. Tsinghua is coming off a huge win over a 20-team field at the ASC17 competition while the CHPC team handily won last year's ISC16 competition here in Germany.

These teams are backed by two of the most stalwart vendor partners of cluster competitions worldwide. Inspur is sponsoring the Tsinghua team (Beihang too) and sponsors the entire Asian Cluster Competition.

Dell is supporting the CHPC team and even helps out with their training by flying them to Dell's Texas HQ for a week of HPC instruction, tech talks with HPC engineers, and BBQ.

Next up in our coverage is an up-close-and-personal look at each team via our video interviews. Stay tuned.

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Robotics and 5G to spur growth of SoC industry – report
    Big OEMs hogging production and COVID causing supply issues

    The system-on-chip (SoC) side of the semiconductor industry is poised for growth between now and 2026, when it's predicted to be worth $6.85 billion, according to an analyst's report. 

    Chances are good that there's an SoC-powered device within arm's reach of you: the tiny integrated circuits contain everything needed for a basic computer, leading to their proliferation in mobile, IoT and smart devices. 

    The report predicting the growth comes from advisory biz Technavio, which looked at a long list of companies in the SoC market. Vendors it analyzed include Apple, Broadcom, Intel, Nvidia, TSMC, Toshiba, and more. The company predicts that much of the growth between now and 2026 will stem primarily from robotics and 5G. 

    Continue reading
  • Deepfake attacks can easily trick live facial recognition systems online
    Plus: Next PyTorch release will support Apple GPUs so devs can train neural networks on their own laptops

    In brief Miscreants can easily steal someone else's identity by tricking live facial recognition software using deepfakes, according to a new report.

    Sensity AI, a startup focused on tackling identity fraud, carried out a series of pretend attacks. Engineers scanned the image of someone from an ID card, and mapped their likeness onto another person's face. Sensity then tested whether they could breach live facial recognition systems by tricking them into believing the pretend attacker is a real user.

    So-called "liveness tests" try to authenticate identities in real-time, relying on images or video streams from cameras like face recognition used to unlock mobile phones, for example. Nine out of ten vendors failed Sensity's live deepfake attacks.

    Continue reading
  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022