Privacy, consent laws under 'unprecedented strain'. We need a data-watcher watcher

Ideal steward would be mediator, soothsayer, guide


Two of the UK’s leading academic societies have recommended setting up a data stewardship body to take a “helicopter view” of the whole data governance landscape.

In their report Data Management and Use: Governance in the 21st Century (PDF) , the British Academy and the Royal Society point out that an increased ability to collect and use data has put privacy and consent laws under “unprecedented strain”.

Controversies like the scrapped NHS plan Care.data and unsuccessful attempts to bring in ID cards have created an underlying fear among the public, which risks hampering the potential benefits of new technologies, they say.

And, although there are a number of data governance actors, such as the judiciary, the information commissioner and the UK Statistics Authority - which it would be “impossible and counterproductive” to centralise - there is a lack of “collective stewardship” for the field.

To tackle this, the societies call for an over-arching data governance body that takes a broader view, without getting involved in the finer details of individual bodies’ day-to-day actions.

The boffins shy away from making specific recommendations on how the body should be funded or its “precise status”.

Instead, they takes a more academic look at the characteristics the body should have.

The societies call for it to monitor and evaluate activities across various areas of data governance, as well as communicating the use of data to the public.

There is also a call for a horizon-scanning function, saying it should anticipate future challenges thrown up by new technologies.

It would “primarily recommend actions to others”, the report said, but could also have some of its own powers - assuming they weren’t duplicating work another body was doing.

However, the lack of full a statutory function leaves a question mark over whether the body would have any real clout, or generate the respect it would need.

The report alludes to this, saying that the stewardship body needs to be set up in a way that it would lend it a sense of legitimacy and permanency.

This would mean it being given a long timeframe, and independent, institutional status - rather than being put out to periodic tender or housed in a non-permanent organisation.

And, it adds, there may be a case for it to get more statutory functions in the future - presumably once the powers that be deem that it has gained people’s respect and confidence.

In addition to plans for the stewardship body, the report sets out a series of data governance principles around one rather lofty central tenant - that the systems that govern data “should promote human flourishing”.

Systems should protect individual rights and interests, ensure transparency and accountability, seek out good practice, learn from both failure and success, and “enhance existing democratic governance”, the report said.

The government has previously said it would consider creating a commission on data ethics and use, but has not indicated a timeline for such a body - and competition for government time and resource is tough, given the current housing regulation crisis and Brexit negotiations. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021