Tesla, GitHub, tech bro VCs... Silicon Valley sexism row explodes as more women go public

What's the solution?

Analysis Simmering anger over Silicon Valley sexism has exploded, with a slew of women going public with allegations of unwanted sexual advances at the top of the tech industry.

In the latest example of snowballing allegations, top angel investor David McClure was accused of sexual assault by Cheryl Sew Hoy hours after he resigned from his job, having been repeatedly accused of sexual harassment by a dozen women.

In pure Silicon Valley style, McClure wrote a blog post titled "I'm a Creep. I'm Sorry" after leaving his company 500 Startups. In it he half-apologized for his "past actions [that] hurt or offended several women," but stressed he was "not a bad or evil person."

That McClure's mea culpa was then met with applause and praise infuriated Sew Hoy to the extent that she decided to go public with her experience of McClure's sexual advances against her.

"While Dave acknowledged and apologized for his 'inappropriate behavior' towards multiple women, I felt it generalized his actions to inappropriate comments made in a 'setting he thought was social'," fumed Sew Hoy, adding: "It definitely didn't address the severity of his sexual advances towards me and potentially others."

She then relates how she was shocked when McClure followed her into her bedroom at her apartment and propositioned her. When she told him to leave he "pushed himself onto me to the point where I was backed into a corner."

She goes on: "The fact that I had to say no multiple times, and that he had pushed himself onto me and kissed me without my consent was way more than crossing the line of inappropriateness. It's sexual assault."

Two dozen

McClure was just one of several high-profile venture capitalists named in a New York Times article last week where more than two dozen women provided numerous examples of harassment – in person and over text and social media – typically by men in a position to further the women's goals through large financial investments on behalf of their companies.

In addition to McClure, Chris Sacca of Lowercase Capital, Justin Caldbeck of Binary Capital, and investor Pavel Curda were also called out for alleged inappropriate behavior.

Inevitably, Sacca produced a blog post in which he noted that he had "personally contributed to the problem," but at the same time strongly disputed specific accusations of harassment. Meanwhile, Caldbeck said he was "so, so sorry" for his own "behavior." Curda privately apologized, we're told.

While there has been an aspect of "safety in numbers" when it comes to sexism and harassment in Silicon Valley, the persistent and repeated claims of damaged work cultures has started calls for a more structured and determined approach to handling the issue beyond firing individuals.

One of those fired individuals was not someone accused of harassment, but a female employee who went public with her concerns over workplace culture at electric car maker Tesla.

AJ Vandermeyden was driven to tell her tale of harassment after the now-famous blog post of engineer Susan Fowler was published, which detailed extraordinary levels of sexism at ride-sharing app company Uber.

Fowler wrote her post after she had left the company and it resulted in a report that eventually led to the firing of Uber's CEO Travis Kalanick, as well as his top lieutenant and no fewer than 20 Uber employees.

You're fired

Vandermeyden outlined similar problems at Tesla in a discrimination lawsuit against the car manufacturer, and went public in February with her allegations, arguing that "until somebody stands up, nothing is going to change."

Three months later, she was fired because she had "falsely attacked" Tesla in the press, according to the automaker. However, she claims that at a company "town hall" meeting, male executives were shocked by a string of examples of harassment provided by their female staffers.

One woman said parts of the company's large factory were "predator zones," and others said they felt unsafe around certain male managers, or were repeatedly cat-called. They also complained of being talked over at meetings and the lack of women in leadership roles – age-old complaints from women in the workplace, but still surprising coming from modern tech companies in the liberal Bay Area.

Despite confirmation of the problem, in May, Vandermeyden was given a choice: resign with a payoff, or be fired, she claimed. She refused to resign and was fired. Two days later, CEO Elon Musk sent out an all-company email in which he dismissively referenced her complaint.

"If you are part of a less represented group, you don't get a free pass on being a jerk yourself," wrote Musk. "We have had a few cases at Tesla where someone in a less represented group was actually given a job or promoted over more qualified highly represented candidates and then decided to sue Tesla for millions of dollars because they felt they weren't promoted enough. That is obviously not cool."

In a statement to The Register, Tesla claimed Vandermeyden's allegations were misleading. The biz did not deny she had been axed, we note.

"Ms Vandermeyden’s version of events is not accurate," a spokeswoman told us. "Prior to the meeting, [Tesla's Chief People Officer] Gaby Toledano had conveyed to Ms Vandermeyden that they were meeting to try to resolve Ms Vandermeyden’s issues in a mutually agreeable way for Tesla and Ms Vandermeyden. Gaby also conveyed that exiting the company was a possibility if they could not come to an alternative resolution.

"It was agreed by Ms Vandermeyden and Gaby that this meeting be without lawyers to attempt to positively and mutually resolve the matter together.

"Gaby did not intimidate Ms Vandermeyden. She disagrees that there was any intimidation, nor did Ms. Vandermeyden ever express feeling intimidated during the meeting. In fact, they both had a positive rapport and expressed mutual support, as Gaby was new to her role at Tesla and was attempting to resolve the matter in a positive and mutually supportive manner for the company and for Ms Vandermeyden.

"Ms Vandermeyden was also told that we could get all her things together for her at the office and bring them to her but she declined this, saying she would contact security directly."

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • North Korea pulled in $400m in cryptocurrency heists last year – report

    Plus: FIFA 22 players lose their identity and Texas gets phony QR codes

    In brief Thieves operating for the North Korean government made off with almost $400m in digicash last year in a concerted attack to steal and launder as much currency as they could.

    A report from blockchain biz Chainalysis found that attackers were going after investment houses and currency exchanges in a bid to purloin funds and send them back to the Glorious Leader's coffers. They then use mixing software to make masses of micropayments to new wallets, before consolidating them all again into a new account and moving the funds.

    Bitcoin used to be a top target but Ether is now the most stolen currency, say the researchers, accounting for 58 per cent of the funds filched. Bitcoin accounted for just 20 per cent, a fall of more than 50 per cent since 2019 - although part of the reason might be that they are now so valuable people are taking more care with them.

    Continue reading
  • Tesla Full Self-Driving videos prompt California's DMV to rethink policy on accidents

    Plus: AI systems can identify different chess players by their moves and more

    In brief California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said it’s “revisiting” its opinion of whether Tesla’s so-called Full Self-Driving feature needs more oversight after a series of videos demonstrate how the technology can be dangerous.

    “Recent software updates, videos showing dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the opinions of other experts in this space,” have made the DMV think twice about Tesla, according to a letter sent to California’s Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), chair of the Senate’s transportation committee, and first reported by the LA Times.

    Tesla isn’t required to report the number of crashes to California’s DMV unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo or Cruise because it operates at lower levels of autonomy and requires human supervision. But that may change after videos like drivers having to take over to avoid accidentally swerving into pedestrians crossing the road or failing to detect a truck in the middle of the road continue circulating.

    Continue reading
  • Alien life on Super-Earth can survive longer than us due to long-lasting protection from cosmic rays

    Laser experiments show their magnetic fields shielding their surfaces from radiation last longer

    Life on Super-Earths may have more time to develop and evolve, thanks to their long-lasting magnetic fields protecting them against harmful cosmic rays, according to new research published in Science.

    Space is a hazardous environment. Streams of charged particles traveling at the speed of light, ejected from stars and distant galaxies, bombard planets. The intense radiation can strip atmospheres and cause oceans on planetary surfaces to dry up over time, leaving them arid and incapable of supporting habitable life. Cosmic rays, however, are deflected away from Earth, however, since it’s shielded by its magnetic field.

    Now, a team of researchers led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) believe that Super-Earths - planets that are more massive than Earth but less than Neptune - may have magnetic fields too. Their defensive bubbles, in fact, are estimated to stay intact for longer than the one around Earth, meaning life on their surfaces will have more time to develop and survive.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022