Sniffing the scent of free publicity, Google and Facebook steamroll into net neutrality protest

Didn't talk to organizers, don't have any plans yet


Hark, ye internet peasants. Google and Facebook today trumpeted that they will join the day of protest against efforts to kill off America's net neutrality rules.

The news was welcomed by Fight for the Future, the organization behind the protest planned for Wednesday, July 12. But it also noted pointedly that neither of the online giants had been in contact.

"We have not heard directly from either Facebook or Google, but we're glad to hear that these companies are listening to their employees and Internet users and will speak out for net neutrality with the rest of the Internet on July 12," Fight for the Future campaign director Evan Greer said in a statement. "We hope that they plan to do something meaningful."

Several big internet names have been notable for their absence from the list of companies planning to use their widespread reach to highlight the plan by Ajit Pai – the boss of America's comms regulator, the FCC – to scrap the Open Internet Order and replace it with... well, we don't know what yet.

When the campaign was formally announced, the biggest name of roughly 45 companies backing it was Amazon. Since then, nearly 150 other companies have come aboard, including big names like Netflix and Twitter.

But Google and Facebook have stubbornly failed to appear on the list, leading to repeated questioning from the press and employees over why, and whether they will join in the protest.

Uh, yeah, sure

On Thursday, Google broke its self-imposed silence with a spokesperson saying that it "will participate" and claiming that it has "always planned to be part of it," but the company has yet to announce any plans or even blog its support.

Likewise Facebook, which hasn't even supplied on-the-record support and has also not said what it plans to do.

That is in stark contrast to the other tech companies, many of whom have explicitly relayed their plans for next Wednesday. Vimeo, for example, will include a short 30-second ad in front of all its videos, warning about the risks of getting rid of the rules.

Mobile apps will push notifications to their users warning that "Big ISPs want the power to slow down our app" and directing people to an online petition. And participating websites will add one of a number of pop-up boxes warning of internet slowdowns, website blocks and possible charges for accessing the website if the plans move ahead. Each pop-up will also ask users to provide their personal details to send a letter to the FCC opposing its plans.

The campaign has also created "spinning wheel of death" avatars and is encouraging internet users to replace their Facebook and Twitter images with them.

Google and Facebook's half-hearted support is a source of frustration in the internet industry, with some suspecting that since both companies are big and rich enough to deal with the implications of net neutrality rules being struck down, they are balancing the political implications of actively opposing the FCC and the Republican Party with supporting smaller players on the internet.

Money talks

The truth is that Google and Facebook also stand to gain from a less open internet ecosystem that would make it much harder for the next Google or Facebook to gain traction. A similar conflict of interest has also struck Netflix, which can now afford to pay cable companies to get to their users (and does so), and stands to benefit from the barriers to entry that getting rid of the Open Internet Order will introduce.

Netflix insists that it will stand up for the little man and an open internet, but that situation almost certainly stems from the personal views of its top executives. When the company acts in its corporate interests, it takes a much less pro-net neutrality line.

If and when the FCC does scrap the rules, large companies will be under significant pressure from their shareholders to take a more pragmatic line and – as we have seen repeatedly in the past – ideology will give way to profit-making.

Although the day of protest is likely to result in a huge wave of criticism from ordinary internet users against the FCC, the sad truth is that the cable industry and FCC chair Pai have already prepared for it.

In several speeches, Pai has outlined his willingness to effectively ignore views he doesn't agree with, and Big Cable – with Pai's assistance – is clearly preparing its own mass-response in an effort to counteract the internet companies' push.

It is going to be a big tussle, with the Republican Party, Republican FCC commissioners and Big Cable on one side, and internet companies and Democrats on the other.

Where the issue lands will likely depend on how riled up internet users – every one of them a voter and a cable customer – become. And the biggest driver of internet users' opinion will be Google and Facebook.

In their hypocritical efforts to sit on the fence, Google and Facebook may end up being the deciding factor behind the push to get rid of net neutrality. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Makers of ad blockers and browser privacy extensions fear the end is near
    Overhaul of Chrome add-ons set for January, Google says it's for all our own good

    Special report Seven months from now, assuming all goes as planned, Google Chrome will drop support for its legacy extension platform, known as Manifest v2 (Mv2). This is significant if you use a browser extension to, for instance, filter out certain kinds of content and safeguard your privacy.

    Google's Chrome Web Store is supposed to stop accepting Mv2 extension submissions sometime this month. As of January 2023, Chrome will stop running extensions created using Mv2, with limited exceptions for enterprise versions of Chrome operating under corporate policy. And by June 2023, even enterprise versions of Chrome will prevent Mv2 extensions from running.

    The anticipated result will be fewer extensions and less innovation, according to several extension developers.

    Continue reading
  • I was fired for blowing the whistle on cult's status in Google unit, says contractor
    The internet giant, a doomsday religious sect, and a lawsuit in Silicon Valley

    A former Google video producer has sued the internet giant alleging he was unfairly fired for blowing the whistle on a religious sect that had all but taken over his business unit. 

    The lawsuit demands a jury trial and financial restitution for "religious discrimination, wrongful termination, retaliation and related causes of action." It alleges Peter Lubbers, director of the Google Developer Studio (GDS) film group in which 34-year-old plaintiff Kevin Lloyd worked, is not only a member of The Fellowship of Friends, the exec was influential in growing the studio into a team that, in essence, funneled money back to the fellowship.

    In his complaint [PDF], filed in a California Superior Court in Silicon Valley, Lloyd lays down a case that he was fired for expressing concerns over the fellowship's influence at Google, specifically in the GDS. When these concerns were reported to a manager, Lloyd was told to drop the issue or risk losing his job, it is claimed. 

    Continue reading
  • Google has more reasons why it doesn't like antitrust law that affects Google
    It'll ruin Gmail, claims web ads giant

    Google has a fresh list of reasons why it opposes tech antitrust legislation making its way through Congress but, like others who've expressed discontent, the ad giant's complaints leave out mention of portions of the proposed law that address said gripes.

    The law bill in question is S.2992, the Senate version of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA), which is closer than ever to getting votes in the House and Senate, which could see it advanced to President Biden's desk.

    AICOA prohibits tech companies above a certain size from favoring their own products and services over their competitors. It applies to businesses considered "critical trading partners," meaning the company controls access to a platform through which business users reach their customers. Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta in one way or another seemingly fall under the scope of this US legislation. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022