Rimini Street: Dispute with Oracle is contract law, not copyright

Ninth Circuit panel urged to throw out injunction on software support biz


The latest installment of the years-long legal battle between software support company Rimini Street and Oracle was acted out in the US Ninth Circuit court yesterday.

In a ruling issued last October, Rimini Street was fined £27.7m for infringing Oracle's copyright and slapped with an injunction banning Rimini from accessing non-public parts of Oracle's websites, downloading its software or providing any of Big Red's software to its customers.

The case hinges on Rimini Street's 2010 decision to host Oracle software on its own servers, as well as "cloning" that software and making it available to multiple customers.

In October 2015, the company was fined $50m for improperly downloading and using Oracle's copyrighted software, as well as a further $46.2m in attorney's fees.

The smaller company accepted some of the charges against it, saying it will pay $35.6m for "innocently infringing the software", but appealed against the rest following the October 2016 judgment.

Oral arguments in the case were heard by three judges in the Ninth Circuit yesterday, where Rimini's lawyer Mark Perry argued that the case should come under contractural – not copyright – laws.

Perry said that a "single fundamental error infected and pervaded the entire copyright case", arguing that Rimini should have been allowed to copy the software for its clients, as they had paid licence fees.

He said that those licensing agreements allow third parties to create a testing and development environment that help companies provide support, updates and fixes for their customers.

Without being able to do this, Rimini Street is prevented from carrying out its responsibilities to its own clients, Perry added.

He argued that Oracle had surrendered its exclusive rights to copying, and that Rimini had permission to copy the software – instead the issue was with the environment that it created and how that environment was used, and on which server it lived.

"Cross-use and hosting are contract law," Perry said. "Those are licence disputes... and ought to be resolved as matter of contract law and not copyright law."

The injunction, Perry said, "goes so far beyond the licence".

It restricts Rimini Street's access to the source code – which he described as a First Amendment violation – and prevents the company using any software learnings from one client for the benefit of another, which prohibits "the mental processes" of engineers, he said.

Paul Clement, representing Oracle, said that many of Perry's arguments were not made during earlier hearings.

Clement then focused on the large-scale nature of the downloads, saying that mass copying is a copyright infringement, and that nothing in the licences "remotely authorised" Rimini Street to have thousands of copies on their own servers.

"They can't make a testing environment on their own servers," he said.

However, judge Michelle Friedland asked Clement why the injunction was necessary as Rimini Street appeared to be taking steps towards complying.

Clement said "the history of the case" made it necessary because Rimini Street had made misrepresentations to Oracle and to the courts, and that it would allow Rimini to be held in contempt in the future.

The case was taken under submission. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean sets sail for serverless seas with Functions feature
    Might be something for those who find AWS, Azure, GCP overly complex

    DigitalOcean dipped its toes in the serverless seas Tuesday with the launch of a Functions service it's positioning as a developer-friendly alternative to Amazon Web Services Lambda, Microsoft Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions.

    The platform enables developers to deploy blocks or snippets of code without concern for the underlying infrastructure, hence the name serverless. However, according to DigitalOcean Chief Product Officer Gabe Monroy, most serverless platforms are challenging to use and require developers to rewrite their apps for the new architecture. The ultimate goal being to structure, or restructure, an application into bits of code that only run when events occur, without having to provision servers and stand up and leave running a full stack.

    "Competing solutions are not doing a great job at meeting developers where they are with workloads that are already running today," Monroy told The Register.

    Continue reading
  • Patch now: Zoom chat messages can infect PCs, Macs, phones with malware
    Google Project Zero blows lid off bug involving that old chestnut: XML parsing

    Zoom has fixed a security flaw in its video-conferencing software that a miscreant could exploit with chat messages to potentially execute malicious code on a victim's device.

    The bug, tracked as CVE-2022-22787, received a CVSS severity score of 5.9 out of 10, making it a medium-severity vulnerability. It affects Zoom Client for Meetings running on Android, iOS, Linux, macOS and Windows systems before version 5.10.0, and users should download the latest version of the software to protect against this arbitrary remote-code-execution vulnerability.

    The upshot is that someone who can send you chat messages could cause your vulnerable Zoom client app to install malicious code, such as malware and spyware, from an arbitrary server. Exploiting this is a bit involved, so crooks may not jump on it, but you should still update your app.

    Continue reading
  • Google says it would release its photorealistic DALL-E 2 rival – but this AI is too prejudiced for you to use
    It has this weird habit of drawing stereotyped White people, team admit

    DALL·E 2 may have to cede its throne as the most impressive image-generating AI to Google, which has revealed its own text-to-image model called Imagen.

    Like OpenAI's DALL·E 2, Google's system outputs images of stuff based on written prompts from users. Ask it for a vulture flying off with a laptop in its claws and you'll perhaps get just that, all generated on the fly.

    A quick glance at Imagen's website shows off some of the pictures it's created (and Google has carefully curated), such as a blue jay perched on a pile of macarons, a robot couple enjoying wine in front of the Eiffel Tower, or Imagen's own name sprouting from a book. According to the team, "human raters exceedingly prefer Imagen over all other models in both image-text alignment and image fidelity," but they would say that, wouldn't they.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022