For one night only: Net neutrality punch-up between Big Cable, Big Web this September

Move over, Mayweather and McGregor


The American spectator sport that is net neutrality has just got its own Rumble in the Jungle.

On September 7, the US House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing titled "Ground rules for the Internet eco-system," its chairman Greg Walden (R-OR) announced during a subcommittee hearing on Tuesday morning, and it is designed to pitch Big Internet against Big Cable in the battle over control of the 'net.

"It's time for Congress to legislate the rules of the internet," Walden declared, "and stop the ping-pong game of regulations and litigation."

Somewhat unusually, he then named the companies whose top executives have been invited to testify. On the tech side: Facebook, Alphabet (Google), Amazon and Netflix. On the cable side: Comcast, AT&T, Verizon and Charter Communications.

"Make no mistake," Walden said, "given the importance of this public policy debate, it is essential that we hear directly from the country's top internet and edge provider leaders who frequently speak out publicly about rules of the internet. It's time they came before us and directly shared their positions and answered our questions."

The decision is a bold but calculated move by the Republicans in Congress to open a path for scrapping existing net neutrality rules by putting tech companies on the spot and hoping they will err on the side of caution when it comes to the Open Internet Order.

It was noticeable during this month's "day of protest" against US broadband watchdog the FCC's plans to scrap the current net neutrality rules that the big tech companies were tepid in their support. They were obliged to support the protest given their previous support of net neutrality and the groundswell of users who expected such a stance – but the fact is that none of the companies brought out their big guns.

And that's because Facebook, Alphabet, Amazon and Netflix are now of such size and scope that net neutrality is less of a priority. Internet users would expect to be able to use each company's services without issue, putting them in a strong negotiating position with cable giants like Comcast and AT&T. If Comcast, for example, were to limit or throttle Facebook, it would almost certainly lose customers as a result.

Art of the deal

At the same time, they have sufficient money and sway to cut deals that could actually benefit their bottom lines by raising barriers to entry for their competitors.

In addition, Big Tech now has many more legislative and regulatory concerns than just net neutrality, given its ever-expanding business: Google is building self-driving cars; Amazon is buying supermarket chains.

The tech giants' policy men in Washington, DC, will likely have already told them that the fight over the Open Internet Order is already lost given the FCC, Republican leadership and president's publicly stated determination to kill it off. There's no point going down with the sinking ship.

That is why during the Day of Action, all we saw from Big Tech were a smattering of limp-wristed blog posts and blink-and-you'll-miss-em protest boxes.

  • Google published a blog post talking about the "open internet" but steered clear of any language that directly challenged the FCC or cable companies. "It's an important chapter in this debate, and we hope you’ll make your voice heard," read the lily-livered effort. Nothing appeared on the Google homepage or in search results.
  • Facebook also published a little post by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who defined net neutrality as "the idea that the internet should be free and open for everyone." And while he noted that Facebook "strongly supports" the current rules, the next sentence noted "we're also open to working with members of Congress and anyone else on laws to protect net neutrality." Nothing appeared on Facebook's many millions of pages served to global internet users.
  • Most people missed Amazon's call to action. It was stuck between ads on the right-hand side of its website. The master of online user interaction used a plain white box with the text "Net neutrality? Learn more." It would be hard to imagine a less impactful approach.
  • And Netflix continued its schizophrenic approach to net neutrality. Once the fierce warrior on behalf of its users, it ran a thin, grey banner at the top of its website reading "Protect internet freedom. Defend net neutrality. Take action" – with a link to an online petition. To be fair, it also sent out a tweet with a strong support message – but its response was eons away from earlier support and advocacy for net neutrality.

When it comes to formal responses to the FCC's proposal, Big Tech has also hidden behind industry organizations like the Internet Association to make strong criticisms.

As such, the House Energy and Commerce Committee is counting on a muted response from the household internet names – where it would get a very different and more aggressive response by smaller internet companies for whom net neutrality could be a matter of life and death. Don't expect to see Airbnb, Vimeo or Kickstarter invited to the party.

In fact, one of the best options for Big Tech executives could be to skip the hearing altogether – something that chair Walden was all too aware of, which is why he name-checked the companies in a public statement (later posted to the committee's Twitter feed) and included the statement: "With more than a month's notice, I am sure they can arrange their schedules to accommodate our invitations."

On the other side of course, we can expect Big Cable to bring significant supplies of fire and brimstone as they rail against the terrible, business-destroying regulations that will kill off innovation and force them to stop expanding their rollout of broadband.

So while this may still be the tech policy Rumble in the Jungle, it's as if we already know Muhammed Ali's "rope-a-dope" strategy. In other words, it'll make for great TV but we already know how it will go down. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Makers of ad blockers and browser privacy extensions fear the end is near
    Overhaul of Chrome add-ons set for January, Google says it's for all our own good

    Special report Seven months from now, assuming all goes as planned, Google Chrome will drop support for its legacy extension platform, known as Manifest v2 (Mv2). This is significant if you use a browser extension to, for instance, filter out certain kinds of content and safeguard your privacy.

    Google's Chrome Web Store is supposed to stop accepting Mv2 extension submissions sometime this month. As of January 2023, Chrome will stop running extensions created using Mv2, with limited exceptions for enterprise versions of Chrome operating under corporate policy. And by June 2023, even enterprise versions of Chrome will prevent Mv2 extensions from running.

    The anticipated result will be fewer extensions and less innovation, according to several extension developers.

    Continue reading
  • Google has more reasons why it doesn't like antitrust law that affects Google
    It'll ruin Gmail, claims web ads giant

    Google has a fresh list of reasons why it opposes tech antitrust legislation making its way through Congress but, like others who've expressed discontent, the ad giant's complaints leave out mention of portions of the proposed law that address said gripes.

    The law bill in question is S.2992, the Senate version of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA), which is closer than ever to getting votes in the House and Senate, which could see it advanced to President Biden's desk.

    AICOA prohibits tech companies above a certain size from favoring their own products and services over their competitors. It applies to businesses considered "critical trading partners," meaning the company controls access to a platform through which business users reach their customers. Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta in one way or another seemingly fall under the scope of this US legislation. 

    Continue reading
  • Amazon fears it could run out of US warehouse workers by 2024
    Internal research says the hiring pool has already dried up in a number of locations stateside

    Jeff Bezos once believed that Amazon's low-skill worker churn was a good thing as a long-term workforce would mean a "march to mediocrity." He may have to eat his words if an internal memo is accurate.

    First reported by Recode, the company's 2021 research rather bluntly says: "If we continue business as usual, Amazon will deplete the available labor supply in the US network by 2024."

    Some locations will be hit much earlier, with the Phoenix metro area in Arizona expected to exhaust its available labor pool by the end of 2021. The Inland Empire region of California could reach breaking point by the close of this year, according to the research.

    Continue reading
  • I was fired for blowing the whistle on cult's status in Google unit, says contractor
    The internet giant, a doomsday religious sect, and a lawsuit in Silicon Valley

    A former Google video producer has sued the internet giant alleging he was unfairly fired for blowing the whistle on a religious sect that had all but taken over his business unit. 

    The lawsuit demands a jury trial and financial restitution for "religious discrimination, wrongful termination, retaliation and related causes of action." It alleges Peter Lubbers, director of the Google Developer Studio (GDS) film group in which 34-year-old plaintiff Kevin Lloyd worked, is not only a member of The Fellowship of Friends, the exec was influential in growing the studio into a team that, in essence, funneled money back to the fellowship.

    In his complaint [PDF], filed in a California Superior Court in Silicon Valley, Lloyd lays down a case that he was fired for expressing concerns over the fellowship's influence at Google, specifically in the GDS. When these concerns were reported to a manager, Lloyd was told to drop the issue or risk losing his job, it is claimed. 

    Continue reading
  • UK competition watchdog seeks to make mobile browsers, cloud gaming and payments more competitive
    Investigation could help end WebKit monoculture on iOS devices

    The United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on Friday said it intends to launch an investigation of Apple's and Google's market power with respect to mobile browsers and cloud gaming, and to take enforcement action against Google for its app store payment practices.

    "When it comes to how people use mobile phones, Apple and Google hold all the cards," said Andrea Coscelli, Chief Executive of the CMA, in a statement. "As good as many of their services and products are, their strong grip on mobile ecosystems allows them to shut out competitors, holding back the British tech sector and limiting choice."

    The decision to open a formal investigation follows the CMA's year-long study of the mobile ecosystem. The competition watchdog's findings have been published in a report that concludes Apple and Google have a duopoly that limits competition.

    Continue reading
  • End of the road for biz living off free G Suite legacy edition
    Firms accustomed to freebies miffed that web giant's largess doesn't last

    After offering free G Suite apps for more than a decade, Google next week plans to discontinue its legacy service – which hasn't been offered to new customers since 2012 – and force business users to transition to a paid subscription for the service's successor, Google Workspace.

    "For businesses, the G Suite legacy free edition will no longer be available after June 27, 2022," Google explains in its support document. "Your account will be automatically transitioned to a paid Google Workspace subscription where we continue to deliver new capabilities to help businesses transform the way they work."

    Small business owners who have relied on the G Suite legacy free edition aren't thrilled that they will have to pay for Workspace or migrate to a rival like Microsoft, which happens to be actively encouraging defectors. As noted by The New York Times on Monday, the approaching deadline has elicited complaints from small firms that bet on Google's cloud productivity apps in the 2006-2012 period and have enjoyed the lack of billing since then.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022