Apple chief on Chinese VPN app ban: We always toe the line with other nations' laws

Situation is 'very different' to San Bernadino case

Apple boss Tim Cook has said that his company would "rather not" remove apps from its store – but has to comply with the law in China.

His comments come after it was revealed that Apple has removed a number of the virtual private network apps that allow users to circumvent the Great Firewall from its Chinese store.

Cook was responding to a question about the move from an analyst on the firm's Q3 earnings call yesterday.

He said that Apple had no choice but to follow the stricter laws laid down by Chinese authorities, which require that everyone who operates a VPN must have government permission to do so.

Late last month, Apple capitulated and removed some VPN apps from its Chinese store, including ExpressVPN and Star VPN, which both received notice of Apple's decision on July 29.

ExpressVPN said at the time that it was "disappointed in this development, as it represents the most drastic measure the Chinese government has taken to block the use of VPNs to date, and we are troubled to see Apple aiding China's censorship efforts".

However, Cook's response was that his firm had no choice – and that it was better to try to "engage" with governments it disagreed with.

"We would obviously rather not remove the apps, but like we do in other countries, we follow the law wherever we do business," Cook said.

"We strongly believe that participating in markets and bringing benefits to customers is in the best interest of the folks there and in other countries as well. And so we believe in engaging with governments even when we disagree."

He also tried to separate the firm's decision to comply with Chinese rules from when it stood up to the US government by refusing to hack the San Bernadino shooter's phone last year.

Some folks have tried to link it to the US situation last year, and they're very different. In the case of the US, the law in the US supported us, which was very clear.

In the case of China, the law is also very clear there. And like we would if the US changed the law here, we'd have to abide by them in both cases. That doesn't mean that we don't state our point of view in the appropriate way. We always do that.

Cook did concede, though, that heavy regulations can stifle innovation, saying that the company was "hopeful that over time the restrictions that we're seeing are loosened because innovation really requires freedom to collaborate and communicate".

China is a lucrative market for Apple, and the company last month opened its first data centre in the nation, also in order to fall in line with Beijing's tougher new cybersecurity laws.

These say that data on Chinese citizens must be stored within the country, as well as that all cloud services need to be operated by Chinese companies.

Apple is working with the Chinese data management firm Guizhou-Cloud Big Data Industry so it can still offer iCloud services to customers in the country.

At the time, Cupertino said that "no backdoors will be created into any of our systems". ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022