Forget sexy zero-days. Siemens medical scanners can be pwned by two-year-old-days

Take 'em off the network, docs told, until 2015 patches arrive

Hackers can exploit trivial flaws in network-connected Siemens' medical scanners to run arbitrary malicious code on the equipment.

These remotely accessible vulnerabilities lurk in all of Siemens' positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) scanners running Microsoft Windows 7. These are the molecular imaging gizmos used to detect tumors, look for signs of brain disease, and so on, in people. They pick up gamma rays from radioactive tracers injected into patients, and perform X-ray scans of bodies.

US Homeland Security warned on Thursday that exploits for bugs in the equipment's software are in the wild, and "an attacker with a low skill would be able to exploit these vulnerabilities." That's because the flaws lie within Microsoft and Persistent Systems' code, which runs on the Siemens hardware, and were patched years ago.

The patches just didn't make their way to the scanners. That means an attacker on, say, a hospital network could access the machines and hijack them, or from afar over the internet if the device isn't properly secured and left facing the public web.

"Siemens has identified four vulnerabilities in Siemens’ Molecular Imaging products running on Windows 7," said Homeland Sec's ICS-CERT wing.

"Siemens is preparing updates for the affected products. These vulnerabilities could be exploited remotely. Exploits that target these vulnerabilities are known to be publicly available."

The flaws are:

  • CVE-2015-1635: Patched by Microsoft in its web server code in 2015. A specially crafted request can be sent to port 80 or 443 by an unauthenticated miscreant to either crash the service – a ping of death, effectively – or execute arbitrary code within the kernel and commandeer the machine. The affected Siemens equipment uses this web server to provide a user interface over the network.
  • CVE-2015-1497: Patched by Persistent Systems in its HP Client Automation service, which it licensed from HP in 2013 and now maintains and distributes itself. The bug was fixed in 2015. The software is known these days as Radia Client Automation software. The code is bundled with affected Siemens equipment for remote administration. The vulnerability can be exploited by an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by sending a specially crafted request to port 3465.
  • CVE-2015-7860, CVE-2015-7861: More remotely exploitable bugs in the HP, er, Radia automation service, all patched in 2015.

"Siemens is preparing updates for the affected products and recommends protecting network access to the molecular imaging products with appropriate mechanisms," ICS-CERT added. "It is advised to run the devices in a dedicated network segment and protected IT environment."

You can find an advisory from Siemens here on what to do next if you're an administrator for one of these machines. If you can't patch immediately, you're basically told to unplug them from the network. They are perfectly capable of being run in standalone mode, apparently.

Which is good, because no one wants an X-ray scanner to go nuts at the hand of a hacker while a patient is in it. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • AMD claims its GPUs beat Nvidia on performance per dollar
    * Terms, conditions, hardware specs and software may vary – a lot

    As a slowdown in PC sales brings down prices for graphics cards, AMD is hoping to win over the market's remaining buyers with a bold, new claim that its latest Radeon cards provide better performance for the dollar than Nvidia's most recent GeForce cards.

    In an image tweeted Monday by AMD's top gaming executive, the chip designer claims its lineup of Radeon RX 6000 cards provide better performance per dollar than competing ones from Nvidia, with all but two of the ten cards listed offering advantages in the double-digit percentages. AMD also claims to provide better performance for the power required by each card in all but two of the cards.

    Continue reading
  • Google opens the pod doors on Bay View campus
    A futuristic design won't make people want to come back – just ask Apple

    After nearly a decade of planning and five years of construction, Google is cutting the ribbon on its Bay View campus, the first that Google itself designed.

    The Bay View campus in Mountain View – slated to open this week – consists of two office buildings (one of which, Charleston East, is still under construction), 20 acres of open space, a 1,000-person event center and 240 short-term accommodations for Google employees. The search giant said the buildings at Bay View total 1.1 million square feet. For reference, that's less than half the size of Apple's spaceship. 

    The roofs on the two main buildings, which look like pavilions roofed in sails, were designed that way for a purpose: They're a network of 90,000 scale-like solar panels nicknamed "dragonscales" for their layout and shimmer. By scaling the tiles, Google said the design minimises damage from wind, rain and snow, and the sloped pavilion-like roof improves solar capture by adding additional curves in the roof. 

    Continue reading
  • Pentester pops open Tesla Model 3 using low-cost Bluetooth module
    Anything that uses proximity-based BLE is vulnerable, claim researchers

    Tesla Model 3 and Y owners, beware: the passive entry feature on your vehicle could potentially be hoodwinked by a relay attack, leading to the theft of the flash motor.

    Discovered and demonstrated by researchers at NCC Group, the technique involves relaying the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) signals from a smartphone that has been paired with a Tesla back to the vehicle. Far from simply unlocking the door, this hack lets a miscreant start the car and drive away, too.

    Essentially, what happens is this: the paired smartphone should be physically close by the Tesla to unlock it. NCC's technique involves one gadget near the paired phone, and another gadget near the car. The phone-side gadget relays signals from the phone to the car-side gadget, which forwards them to the vehicle to unlock and start it. This shouldn't normally happen because the phone and car are so far apart. The car has a defense mechanism – based on measuring transmission latency to detect that a paired device is too far away – that ideally prevents relayed signals from working, though this can be defeated by simply cutting the latency of the relay process.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022