Openreach pegs full fibre overhaul anywhere between £3bn and £6bn

And it'll cost consumers an extra £7 per head a month

Openreach has estimated it will need to fork out between £3bn and £6bn to invest in 10 million fibre-to-the-premise connections in the UK by 2025, according to a leaked copy of its FTTP consultation seen by The Register.

The broadband division of BT, which legally separated from the former state monopoly earlier this year, put its consultation out privately to its 580 internet service providers last month, which will close in September.

In it, Openreach proposes communication providers commit to moving "the entire Openreach customer base" to fibre in the areas identified, which would mean customers paying an additional £7 per month.

Opting for a "cutover" model would cost less than building the network out in a piecemeal fashion. If deployment and connection costs were recovered only from customers choosing to take up fibre, consumers would have to pay an £25 extra per head, it said.

Openreach's current rental charge for the delivery of superfast broadband and a copper line ranges between £14-£17 per month, said the document.

BT has been accused of dragging its feet on fibre investment, instead "sweating" its copper assets. It previously estimated a full national fibre roll-out would cost £28bn.

Both the government and regulator Ofcom have been keen to push for greater fibre investment, with current FTTP penetration lagging behind many other countries at just 2 per cent.

Chief exec Clive Selley has said that by using new techniques the company has recently halved the cost of delivering "full-fibre" infrastructure. He said Openreach could reach a more "ambitious" target than the 2 million fibre connections it has already committed to by 2020.

"But building a large-scale network is still a huge commercial, technical and logistical challenge that's going to need real ingenuity, flexibility and coordination across government and industry," he added.

However, some of BT's network competitors were not convinced by the approach. Mark Collins, director of strategy at CityFibre, said: "Even if they migrate everybody across, they will need to increase the price by 50 per cent. And they are saying if they don't do forced migration, we'll need to charge even more.

"Either way, it looks unattractive for CPs to commit to Openreach’s approach when potentially better alternatives are emerging."

He said the model could act as a deterrent for comms providers to build their own network using Openreach's ducts and poles. Ofcom recently proposed to slash the rental costs for smaller providers seeking to use Openreach's infrastructure.

Collins claimed that by Openreach’s own analysis, if alternative operators build competing FTTP networks, potentially using Openreach ducts and poles, the economic case for Openreach to deploy FTTP in the same area "is weakened considerably”.

He said BT was moving in the right direction. "Competitors are doing our bit to provide infrastructure across the UK, but our combined efforts won't do it all. So it's sensible Openreach finds the right commercial model and its FTTP rollout is additive to the other deployments underway rather than duplicating them. However, it's important CPs don't get locked into Openreach."

Matthew Hare, chief exec of small network provider Gigaclear, praised the consultation, saying it signalled "the beginning of the end" for copper networks. "Effectively what they are saying is, we are ready to start turning off the copper network."

An Openreach spokesperson said: "Deploying full fibre at scale will cost billions of pounds – we are currently in the process of exploring what we can do collectively across industry, government and regulators to minimise those costs.

"The exact costs involved would depend on a variety of factors – which is what the consultation is exploring.

"We also need to consider with CPs what the level of demand for full fibre is, and what the best way is for us to recover the costs of building any network. This process is ongoing and we will share more detail in due course." ®

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022