Samsung keeps the smartwatch alive. Just

'Don't think of it as a watch'


IFA Samsung has put its smartwatch on a diet in a bid to maintain dwindling market interest in the once-hot device category.

Activity trackers don't have the stigma that smartwatches do – so Samsung has disguised the watch as a Fitness Thing™.

Its new Tizen-powered Gear Sport will go head to head with Fitbit's new watch, and (probably) Apple's third-generation Watch in the autumn shopping season. The Sport retains the characteristic rotating bezel from the Gear S series, and its 360x360 display, and it's a much less clunky package.

It's 9g lighter and 42.9 x 44.6 x 11.6mm compared to the 49 x 46 x 12.9mm of the Gear S3. As the name suggests, it's focused on fitness tracking and, more specifically, swimmers.

The usual 4GB of storage is inboard, a slightly smaller 300mAh battery than the Gear S3, it supports NFC payments via Samsung Pay, and will work with iPhones. It will compete with the make-or-break Fitbit Ionic watch, and Polar's Wear-based fitness watch, both priced at around $300. The third Fitbit watch is no looker, but does boast its own OS, so has better battery life (Fitbit claims four days) and its own payment system, Fitbit Pay.

Only Huawei and LG have stuck with Wear in a serious way, although boutique brands continue to dabble. Apple is expected to announce its new Watch in September.

The problem with Fitness Things™ is that the market may already be saturated – sales fell for the first time this year.

Samsung also unveiled a new version of its Fit Pro tracker. Specs for both are here.

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022