Please, pleeeease let me ban Kaspersky Lab from US govt PCs – senator

Who needs actual evidence when you're scared of Russia?

US Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) simply can't wait to banish Kaspersky Lab's antivirus from American government computers on the grounds it's a security risk.

Her plan is to amend the nation's latest National Defense Authorization Act, which is legislation that has to be passed each year to green-light funding and policies for the US military. It's also a handy vehicle for sneaking pet agendas into law, each piggybacking the proposed act: there are 341 amendments on the House version of the bill already, and eight on the Senate version.

In June, Shaheen successfully lobbied the Senate Armed Services Committee to back her call to ban Kaspersky's code from Uncle Sam's systems. The panel duly concluded its scrutiny of the funding bill with the following recommendation, among others:

A provision that would prohibit any component of the Department of Defense from using, whether directly or through work with or on behalf of another element of the United States Government, from using any software platform developed, in whole or in part, by Kaspersky Lab or any entity of which Kaspersky Lab has a majority ownership.

And thus the Senate version of the defense funding act was updated to include the following text to rid US federal government computers of Kaspersky's security tools by October 2018:


(a) Prohibition.—No department, agency, organization, or other element of the Department of Defense may use, whether directly or through work with or on behalf of another organization or element of the Department or another department or agency of the United States Government, any software platform developed, in whole or in part, by Kaspersky Lab or any entity of which Kaspersky Lab has a majority ownership.

(b) Severance Of Network Connections.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that any network connection between a department, agency, organization, or other element of the Department of Defense and a department or agency of the United States Government that is using or hosting on its networks a software platform described in subsection (a) is immediately severed.

(c) Effective Date.—This section shall take effect on October 1, 2018.

This text has yet to be voted on by the Senate as a whole, which is due to debate the wording in the next few weeks. The provisions also have to pass the House before a finalized law can be presented to President Donald Trump to sign off. The House version of the military funding act has yet to include sanctions specifically against Kaspersky, we note.

In the meantime, Shaheen is on the offensive, drumming up support for her ban via her website and a New York Times op-ed on Tuesday.

"To close this alarming national security vulnerability, I am advancing bipartisan legislation to prohibit the federal government from using Kaspersky Lab software," she explained.

"The Senate Armed Services Committee in June adopted my measure to prohibit the Department of Defense from using Kaspersky Lab software, to limit fallout from what I fear is already a huge breach of national security data."

Shaheen claims Kaspersky software potentially gives Russian President Putin an "all-access pass" to the computers it is on and beams sensitive information back to Kremlin servers. Under Russian law, the software biz has a responsibility to aid its home country's internal security agencies, she posited, and as such the code has no place on US computers.

The banishment was previously floated as a way of "countering Russian aggression," and follows years of Kaspersky-bashing inside Congress and outside. Amid the Senate advisory committee's deliberations, Eugene Kaspersky offered up the source code of his software for review – an offer no one in the US government has taken up.

Earlier, in May, five US spy bosses and the acting FBI chief were unanimous in saying they would not use Kaspersky software – although, like Senator Shaheen, they offered no evidence as to why. The following month the FBI raided the homes of some Kaspersky employees, but no arrests were made.

And in July the General Services Administration removed the biz from its list of government-approved purchases, severely limiting its further use. Senator Shaheen wants it banned outright.

"Kaspersky Lab doesn't have inappropriate ties with any government, which is why no credible evidence has been presented publicly by anyone or any organization to back up the false allegations made against the company," the outfit told The Register.

"The only conclusion seems to be that Kaspersky Lab, a private company, is caught in the middle of a geopolitical fight, and it's being treated unfairly even though the company has never helped, nor will help, any government in the world with its cyberespionage or offensive cyber efforts." ®

Other stories you might like

  • Meet Wizard Spider, the multimillion-dollar gang behind Conti, Ryuk malware
    Russia-linked crime-as-a-service crew is rich, professional – and investing in R&D

    Analysis Wizard Spider, the Russia-linked crew behind high-profile malware Conti, Ryuk and Trickbot, has grown over the past five years into a multimillion-dollar organization that has built a corporate-like operating model, a year-long study has found.

    In a technical report this week, the folks at Prodaft, which has been tracking the cybercrime gang since 2021, outlined its own findings on Wizard Spider, supplemented by info that leaked about the Conti operation in February after the crooks publicly sided with Russia during the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    What Prodaft found was a gang sitting on assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars funneled from multiple sophisticated malware variants. Wizard Spider, we're told, runs as a business with a complex network of subgroups and teams that target specific types of software, and has associations with other well-known miscreants, including those behind REvil and Qbot (also known as Qakbot or Pinkslipbot).

    Continue reading
  • Supreme Court urged to halt 'unconstitutional' Texas content-no-moderation law
    Everyone's entitled to a viewpoint but what's your viewpoint on what exactly is and isn't a viewpoint?

    A coalition of advocacy groups on Tuesday asked the US Supreme Court to block Texas' social media law HB 20 after the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week lifted a preliminary injunction that had kept it from taking effect.

    The Lone Star State law, which forbids large social media platforms from moderating content that's "lawful-but-awful," as advocacy group the Center for Democracy and Technology puts it, was approved last September by Governor Greg Abbott (R). It was immediately challenged in court and the judge hearing the case imposed a preliminary injunction, preventing the legislation from being enforced, on the basis that the trade groups opposing it – NetChoice and CCIA – were likely to prevail.

    But that injunction was lifted on appeal. That case continues to be litigated, but thanks to the Fifth Circuit, HB 20 can be enforced even as its constitutionality remains in dispute, hence the coalition's application [PDF] this month to the Supreme Court.

    Continue reading
  • How these crooks backdoor online shops and siphon victims' credit card info
    FBI and co blow lid off latest PHP tampering scam

    The FBI and its friends have warned businesses of crooks scraping people's credit-card details from tampered payment pages on compromised websites.

    It's an age-old problem: someone breaks into your online store and alters the code so that as your customers enter their info, copies of their data is siphoned to fraudsters to exploit. The Feds this week have detailed one such effort that reared its head lately.

    As early as September 2020, we're told, miscreants compromised at least one American company's vulnerable website from three IP addresses: 80[.]249.207.19, 80[.]82.64.211 and 80[.]249.206.197. The intruders modified the web script TempOrders.php in an attempt to inject malicious code into the checkout.php page.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022