Home Sec Amber Rudd: Yeah, I don't understand encryption. So what?

Techies! Will you please stop patronising and sneering! ;_;


UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd has once again demonstrated she does not know how encryption works, this time by explicitly admitting it to delegates at a Tory party fringe conference where she also hit out at "patronising" techies that "sneered" at politicians.

Speaking at a Spectator event, Rudd said: "It's so easy to be patronised in this business. We will do our best to understand [encryption].

"We will take advice from other people but I do feel that there is a sea of criticism for any of us who try and legislate in new areas, who will automatically be sneered at and laughed at for not getting it right," reported the Beeb.

"I don't need to understand how encryption works to understand how it's helping – end-to-end encryption – the criminals. I will engage with the security services to find the best way to combat that."

Rudd has repeatedly criticised tech companies for not doing more to work with the government to allow intelligence services to get into encrypted services such as WhatsApp.

But as many "sneering" experts have previously pointed out, if a backdoor exists then anyone can exploit it, including criminals, making it impossible to allow access to encrypted messages without compromising the entire system.

Rudd had previously been subject to much "patronising" commentary when she said the government needs to get people who "understand the necessary hashtags" talking. The Home Office later clarified that Rudd meant "hashing".

Later today the Home Secretary is expected to announced that people who repeatedly view terrorist content online could face up to 15 years in jail. ®


Keep Reading

Days after President Trump suggests pausing election over security, US House passes $500m for states to shore up election security

Chances of it getting enacted in time for November – slim to almost nil

Election security fears doused with reality: Top officials say Nov 3 'was the most secure in American history.' The end

'No evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised'

Trump fires cybersecurity boss Chris Krebs for doing his job: Securing the election and telling the truth about it

Terminated by presidential tweet that piled on the baseless election-rigging allegations CISA director sought to counter

Days before the US election, phishers net $2.3m from Wisconsin Republicans

Big money in American politics proves chum in the water for online sharks

All bets are Hoff: DXC exec is standing for Brexit Party in UK General Election

Meet Gordon, a man who knows all about job losses, uncertainty and bankers

Remember when Republicans said Dems hacked voting systems to rig Georgia's election? There were no hacks

'No evidence of damage to network or computers, no evidence of theft, damage, or loss of data'

Trump reveals US cyber-attack on Russian election-misdirection troll farms

Maybe Donald isn’t in love with Vlad after all – but he did just give Russia attribution and maybe a peek at tradecraft

Because things aren't bad enough already: COVID-19 is going to mess up election security assumptions too

Socially isolated officials will be fair game for meddling hackers

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020