Seagate fires NASty volley of 12TB spinners with lifebelt for fried data

BarraCuda Pro and IronWolves get a capacity jump

Seagate has fired out three 12TB drives, punting one at the desktop, two at the NAS market, and clobbering WDC on capacity in both areas.

The desktop BarraCuda Pro comes in 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12TB versions, previously maxing out at 10TB. Seagate says it has double the space of its nearest competitor, the 6TB WDC Blue. We understand the thing is helium-filled at the 10 and 12TB levels and air-filled below that.

We think the 10 and 12TB versions employ eight platters with the others relying on six, but have asked Seagate to clarify. The 12TB IronWolves use eight and weighs the same at 705g.

BarraCuda Pro weight stats indicate platter/head count differences:

  • 705g – 10/12TB
  • 650g – 8TB
  • 780g – 6TB
  • 680g – 4TB
  • 550g – 2TB

Why the 6TB version is heavier than the 8TB version is unclear, unless, perhaps, the 8TB is also helium-filled and so has lighter platters.

Seagate doesn't provide a lid-off image so we can't count the platters.


These BarraCudas spin at 7,200rpm, have a 6Gbit/s SATA interface, and a 256MB cache apart from the 2 and 4TB versions, which have a 128MB one. The sustained data transfer rate varies with capacity; it's 250MB/sec at 12TB, 220MB/sec at 4, 6, 8 and 10TB, but 195MB/sec at 2TB.

They have a five-year warranty, a 300TB/year workload limit and support 8,760 power-on hours/year (24x7 operation).


At 12TB the IronWolf and IronWolf Pro are claimed by Seagate to offer the highest capacity, reliability, performance and system scalability in the industry. WDC's Red and Red Pro NAS drives top out at 10TB.


There are eight visible platters in this lid-off image of the IronWolf

IronWolf is a 1 to 8-bay NAS drive with 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12TB capacity points. It spins at 7,200rpm in the 6, 8, 10 and 12TB capacity points and a slower 5,900rpm below that. We understand the 10 and 12TB versions are helium-filled (as are the equivalent IronWolf Pro drives).

The sustained data transfer rates vary by capacity; 250MB/sec at 12TB, 210MB/sec at 6, 8 and 10TB, 180MB/sec at 4, 3, 2, and 1TB. There are two sizes of cache; 256MB for the 6 to 12TB models and 64MB below that.

It supports a 180TB/year workload, has a 1 million hours mean time before failure (MTBF) rating, and a three-year warranty, contrasting poorly with BarraCuda Pro's five-year warranty and 300TB/year workload support.

IronWolf Pro

IronWolf Pro is a more reliable and hard-working drive, coming in 12, 10, 8, 6, 4 and 2TB versions. It is for 1 to 16-bay NAS enclosures, has 300TB/year workload support, a 1.2 million hours MTBF, and a 5-year warranty, making IronWolf look a bit shabby in this department.

The spin speed is 7,200rpm at all capacity points. The cache is 256MB for the 6 to 12TB range and 128MB below that. As with IronWolf the transfer speed varies with capacity; 250MB/sec at 12TB, 214MB//sec at 4, 6, 8, and 10TB, and 195MB/sec at 2TB.

Both lines support Seagate's IronWolf Health Management (IHM) software. This operates on Synology DiskStation NAS, Asustor NAS, and QNAP NAS systems. It displays actionable prevention, intervention or recovery options for the user, and will be available within the next quarter with NAS partners.

Seagate Rescue Data Recovery services are available (two-year plan included) to recover data off a dead drive and Seagate claims a 90 per cent success rate.

The 12TB versions of IronWolf, IronWolf Pro and BarraCuda Pro are now shipping to customers worldwide. ®

Other stories you might like

  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading
  • Cloud security unicorn cuts 20% of staff after raising $1.3b
    Time to play blame bingo: Markets? Profits? Too much growth? Russia? Space aliens?

    Cloud security company Lacework has laid off 20 percent of its employees, just months after two record-breaking funding rounds pushed its valuation to $8.3 billion.

    A spokesperson wouldn't confirm the total number of employees affected, though told The Register that the "widely speculated number on Twitter is a significant overestimate."

    The company, as of March, counted more than 1,000 employees, which would push the jobs lost above 200. And the widely reported number on Twitter is about 300 employees. The biz, based in Silicon Valley, was founded in 2015.

    Continue reading
  • Talos names eight deadly sins in widely used industrial software
    Entire swaths of gear relies on vulnerability-laden Open Automation Software (OAS)

    A researcher at Cisco's Talos threat intelligence team found eight vulnerabilities in the Open Automation Software (OAS) platform that, if exploited, could enable a bad actor to access a device and run code on a targeted system.

    The OAS platform is widely used by a range of industrial enterprises, essentially facilitating the transfer of data within an IT environment between hardware and software and playing a central role in organizations' industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) efforts. It touches a range of devices, including PLCs and OPCs and IoT devices, as well as custom applications and APIs, databases and edge systems.

    Companies like Volvo, General Dynamics, JBT Aerotech and wind-turbine maker AES are among the users of the OAS platform.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022