Apple's iOS password prompts prime punters for phishing: Too easy now for apps to swipe secrets, dev warns

Fake login request boxes spark formal bug report


Apple, we have a problem. A bug report filed Monday through Open Radar – which mirrors bug reports developers submit to Apple's private bug tracking system – suggests that password prompts in iOS apps can be misused to steal passwords and other secrets.

In a blog post today describing the issue, developer Felix Krause, founder of fastlane.tools, explained that Apple's UIAlertController API allows programmers to present alerts that closely mimic legit password prompts from Apple system services like iCloud, iTunes, or GameCenter.

The problem arises because Apple has trained iOS users to hand over their credentials for Apple services from within third-party apps, without any kind of mechanism for verifying the legitimacy of the prompt. Thanks to that indoctrination, a malicious developer can present a lookalike login box – a UIKit alert or action sheet – and expect the user to respond by supplying an Apple ID, a password, or similar.

At present, the risk is theoretical. Krause said in an email to The Register he wasn't aware of anyone using this technique in the wild, though it's difficult to be certain. Apple may detect deliberate deception of this sort through its iOS app review process, but a determined developer may also be able to conceal misuse long enough to see the app distributed.

Using visual trickery to steal data has been a problem for years. For example, a recent Gmail phishing attack relied on image files designed to look like attached PDFs.

Apple's Secure Coding Guide acknowledges that social engineering attacks like phishing can be difficult to combat. It cites domain name homograph attacks by which different character sets (eg. Latin and Cyrillic) can be intermixed to dupe users, noting that Safari has implemented defenses.

That's essentially what Krause is describing – an interface homograph attack. And there isn't really a method to visually separate Apple-authorized prompts from doppelgängers.

"No matter what kind of custom UI Apple would use, people could always somehow fake it," said Krause. "The problem is that now people are used to just entering the password whenever asked, and changing that behavior is really difficult and will take time."

Krause suggests one way to mitigate the risk would be for each alert to contain the app icon in the pop-up or action sheets, similar to how the app icon is shown on the lock screen next to notifications.

Even so, graphic designs can be faked.

"Another way, people on Twitter mentioned, would be a different keyboard for system password inputs," he said. "However I think the best way would be if the dialog tells the user to open the iCloud settings, instead of asking for the password directly."

Apple, as expected, did not respond to a request for comment. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021