UK.gov told to tread carefully with transfer of data sets to NHS Digital

It’s almost as if it doesn’t have a great track record on patient info and IT projects...


The UK government has been advised against a hasty shift of vital data sets from one quango to another as it aims to centralise medical data collection and management.

Data on disease diagnoses, treatment and outcomes is a crucial resource for the health service, and the government has argued that better links between various parts of the NHS will benefit patients, both as individuals and overall.

But efforts to centralise information and increase data sharing across the NHS have not met with great success. The most recent attempt, the Care.data scheme, was scrapped last year amid widespread criticism.

The government hasn't demonstrated a particular aptitude for running major IT projects on time or budget, and the health sector is no exception. Take for instance the £11bn National Programme for IT, scrapped in 2011, and admissions that plans for a paperless NHS by 2018 were probably a bit optimistic.

So it's perhaps a relief that NHS chief clinical information officer Keith McNeill's review (PDF) of proposals to move management of data sets from Public Health England to NHS Digital appear to have "proceed with great caution" stamped all over them.

McNeill was asked to look at whether PHE's data collection and management activities could be moved to NHS Digital, under its auspices as the central repository for health data in the country, and how that could be achieved.

His conclusion is that such a shift should only go ahead once both organisations are certain that NHS Digital has the capability and capacity to manage the data sets without any impact on data quality and performance, and after the costs had been assessed and the money was there to complete the transfer.

To demonstrate this, PHE and NHS Digital should carry out a "due-diligence" process for each data set that considers the costs, risks and capabilities required for both the data transfer and its subsequent management.

The pair should begin a pilot "immediately" to develop and trial a "robust and realistic" process on a significant data set, evaluate and refine it and then create a "clear methodology" that can be used for other data sets.

Proposals for this work should be on the Department of Health's desk this calendar year, McNeill said.

'Not all data sets are equal'

As part of McNeill's assessment, he recommended greater caution on moving some data sets than others, saying PHE should divide them into four tranches based on their complexity and the capabilities NHS Digital would need to manage them.

One of these groups would be data sets that need to remain with the PHE, such as those that support real-time provision of population-facing services that are part of PHE's core functions, like lab results.

The remaining data sets should then fall into three groups. The first two are those that could be moved in 12 to 18 months with "minimum if any disruption to functionality" – defined as having the capacity, capability and costs already in place – and those that would take 18 months to three years to prep for.

That's followed by the National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Diseases Registry and the National Cancer Registry – large, specialist and complex data sets that have "intrinsic links" to other strategic health developments, and need to be considered over a longer time of three to five years.

Similar topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022