Don't rely on us to protect the open internet, warns FTC Commissioner

But… aren't you… supposed…aaargh… Pai!


One of the US government's top regulators has warned that her department is in no position to take on the mantle of protecting the open internet if its sister organization, the FCC, votes on repealing net neutrality regulations later this month.

Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Terrell McSweeny has repeatedly warned that her organization is not able to do the job it may be handed later this month but in an article, she goes into some detail over why.

"The FTC does not have specialized expertise in telecommunications. We don’t have engineers with technical experience in data network management practices. We don’t even have jurisdiction over common carriers," she warns. "These are very real and significant limits to the effectiveness of our tools in ensuring that networks are open and free of harmful discrimination."

In a debate that has been full of angry assertions but little real detail, McSweeny's intervention is welcome in that it walks through likely scenarios.

"For one thing, the FTC's mandate in the competition space is to 'maintain competition.' I believe in the virtues of competition. But we cannot 'maintain' competition that does not exist," she notes. "The reality is that tens of millions of Americans have little or no choice when it comes to wireline broadband service.

neutrality

La La La, I can't hear you: FCC responds to net neut concerns

READ MORE

"Those who oppose net neutrality rules often make the mistake of suggesting that market competition will limit discriminatory conduct and push ISPs to offer consumers better service. But that argument only makes sense if there is underlying market competition to begin with. Otherwise, it’s like saying your dog will protect your house when you don’t own a dog."

Cost + time = mess

She also points out that the sorts of problems that the FTC will be expected to take on for the protection of consumers will be "costly, difficult, and time consuming to detect and prosecute," not to mention the fact that the FTC "lacks the FCC's technical expertise in data network management."

In a real world situation, she notes, it could take years for the FTC to get a court order to stop a company from carrying out harmful conduct – at which point a large and powerful ISP could drive a competitor out of business. "Even if the FTC were ultimately to prevail, we couldn’t resurrect the dead rival," she notes.

Instead, McSweeny argues, the logical approach is the one that currently exists: clear rules from the FCC stating what is not allowed, rather than no rules and a reliance on customer complaints and an after-the-fact investigation by the FTC to prevent abuses.

And just to hammer home the point, McSweeney points out, reluctantly, that the FTC lacks "the tools, the expertise, and the resources" to do what it is being asked to do for million of American consumers. "I have every confidence that our staff will work tirelessly to protect consumers as best they can using the tools we have," she notes, adding: "It will not be enough. We are being set up to fail."

Meanwhile, pro net neutrality advocates are planning another day of protest just two days before the FCC meeting on December 14 where chair Ajit Pai's plan is set to be voted on.

The campaign this time has given up on trying to persuade Pai or his fellow Republican commissioners - who have made it plain they have no intention of debating the issue beyond making snarky comments about celebrity tweets - and is aiming directly at Congress.

"The FCC is days away from voting to end net neutrality. Congress can still stop the vote, but only if we make them," reads a rallying message. The idea is to "break" your website, or app, or social media profile to highlight that the future of the web will be terrible without net neutrality rules.

Oh Canada

The issue will also have broader repercussions: a Canadian government official admitted this week that net neutrality had become an issue in negotiations over a replacement for the NAFTA trade agreement.

"We are including provisions such as online consumer protection to ensure that that is provided for and we also have provisions to provide personal information protection, which we feel is essential in this kind of trade, along with our position that we want to protect net neutrality when it comes to digital trade," Canada's lead NAFTA negotiator Steve Verheul said to a parliamentary committee this week.

According to Verheul, the US negotiating team is focused on trying to get Canada to accept the US version of intermediary protections online – where ISPs and third parties like Facebook can't be held legally responsible for the behavior of their customers in their respond appropriately when notified – but Canadian prefer to leave the issue to the courts and out of a trade agreement.

He admitted that the US' negotiating team "has not reacted positively" to the Canadian pushback on net neutrality. ®


Other stories you might like

  • FCC: Applications for funds to replace Chinese comms kit lack evidence
    Well you told us to rip and ... hang on, we're not getting any money?

    The saga of the US government's plan to rip and replace China-made communications kit from the country's networks has a new twist: following reports that applications for funding far outstripped the cash set aside, it appears two-thirds of such applications lack adequate cost estimates or sufficient supporting evidence.

    The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) informed Congress that it had found deficiencies in 122 of the 181 of the applications filed with it by US carriers for funding to reimburse them for replacing telecoms equipment sourced from Chinese companies.

    The FCC voted nearly a year ago to reimburse medium and small carriers in the US for removing and replacing all network equipment provided by companies such as Huawei and ZTE. The telecoms operators were required to do this in the interests of national security under the terms of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act.

    Continue reading
  • SpaceX: 5G expansion could kill US Starlink broadband
    It would be easier to take this complaint seriously if Elon wasn't so Elon

    If the proposed addition of the 12GHz spectrum to 5G goes forward, Starlink broadband terminals across America could be crippled, or so SpaceX has complained. 

    The Elon Musk biz made the claim [PDF] this week in a filing to the FCC, which is considering allowing Dish to operate a 5G service in the 12GHz band (12.2-12.7GHz). This frequency range is also used by Starlink and others to provide over-the-air satellite internet connectivity.

    SpaceX said its own in-house study, conducted in Las Vegas, showed "harmful interference from terrestrial mobile service to SpaceX's Starlink terminals … more than 77 percent of the time, resulting in full outages 74 percent of the time." It also claimed the interference will extend to a minimum of 13 miles from base stations. In other words, if Dish gets to use these frequencies in the US, it'll render nearby Starlink terminals useless through wireless interference, it was claimed.

    Continue reading
  • Abortion rights: US senators seek ban on sale of health location data
    With Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v Wade, privacy is key

    A group of senators wants to make it illegal for data brokers to sell sensitive location and health information of individuals' medical treatment.

    A bill filed this week by five senators, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), comes in anticipation the Supreme Court's upcoming ruling that could overturn the 49-year-old Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing access to abortion for women in the US.

    The worry is that if the Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade – as is anticipated following the leak in May of a majority draft ruling authored by Justice Samuel Alito – such sensitive data can be used against women.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022