Another day, another Spectre fix slowdown: What to expect if you heart ZFS

Blogger records 7-8% toll on read IOPS


The widely used ZFS file system software is slowed down in both read IOPS and throughput by Intel CPU microcode fixes for the Spectre processor design flaws, one set of numbers suggests.

Systems engineer Jon Kensy blogged about the results of his ZFS testing, based on a VM running ZFS on a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS system on a Dell R620.

He set up a VMware IO Analyzer in a VM on the NFS datastore on the ZFS storage and checked the maximum read and write IOPS and read and write throughput (MB/sec), with a 120-second run of each test before the microcode was patched and then after the microcode was fixed.

Here's what he found:

  Read Throughput Write Throughput Read IOPS Write IOPS
Pre-microcode 670 334 44,211 14,018
Post-microcode 615 336 40,820 13,665
Pre minus post number 55 -2 3,391 353
Per cent change -8.2% +0.6% -7.67% -2.52%

The hit was 7-8 per cent for read IOPS and throughput, a negligible gain for write throughput and slight hit for write IOPS.

It was not a heavily stressed system. He writes: "For production environments where clients demand the best performance possible, a 7.6-8 per cent impact is pretty rough especially since the current tenor of this whole ordeal is one of being cheated out of performance."

He said he thinks ZFS systems should be patched unless "a storage node is extremely well-secured, has no VMs running on it, and only presents storage to white-listed hosts then maybe it could go without the microcode update".

Nexenta's software uses ZFS and its recommendation is: "In the cases where our software is run as a VM or a Docker container, we do recommend that customers patch the underlying OS and hypervisors."

Users of Lustre have found a 10-45 per cent performance hit after applying the Spectre and Meltdown patches. ®


Other stories you might like

  • India reveals home-grown server that won't worry the leading edge

    And a National Blockchain Strategy that calls for gov to host BaaS

    India's government has revealed a home-grown server design that is unlikely to threaten the pacesetters of high tech, but (it hopes) will attract domestic buyers and manufacturers and help to kickstart the nation's hardware industry.

    The "Rudra" design is a two-socket server that can run Intel's Cascade Lake Xeons. The machines are offered in 1U or 2U form factors, each at half-width. A pair of GPUs can be equipped, as can DDR4 RAM.

    Cascade Lake emerged in 2019 and has since been superseded by the Ice Lake architecture launched in April 2021. Indian authorities know Rudra is off the pace, and said a new design capable of supporting four GPUs is already in the works with a reveal planned for June 2022.

    Continue reading
  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021