Timeout everyone. Y'all know that Musk's $500 'flamethrower' is literally a Boring blowtorch?

A flame shower not a grower


You've got to hand it to Elon Musk – the guy could sell pork pies at a rabbinical convention.

Over the weekend, his Boring Company started flogging thousands of "flamethrowers," netting the Tesla and SpaceX billionaire a cool $4.5m in sales as the internet went bananas for the gimmick.

The thought of Musk wielding an actual flamethrower reminded people of Simpsons supervillain Hank Scorpio, driving Elon's fans into a frenzy.

The $500 devices went on sale on Saturday, with Musk promising on Twitter the machines are "guaranteed to liven up any party." Over 9,000 have been ordered, he said, with another 10,000 or so units still in stock.

"Obviously, a flamethrower is a super terrible idea. Definitely don’t buy one," Musk stressed, before adding: "Unless you like fun." Or destroying the undead: "When the zombie apocalypse happens, you’ll be glad you bought a flamethrower. Works against hordes of the undead or your money back," he beamed.

"But wait, there’s more: the flamethrower is sentient, its safe word is 'cryptocurrency' and it comes with a free blockchain."

How the other half live. Here's a video of Musk having fun with his latest thing:

Youtube Video

"Buy an overpriced Boring Company fire extinguisher!" the biz also offers. "You can definitely buy one for less elsewhere, but this one comes with a cool sticker and the button is conveniently riiight above."

Haha, yes, all fuuuun and gaaaaames. But let's be real: the "flamethrower" is basically a glorified propane blowtorch of the type commonly used by gardeners for burning weeds, and for clearing snowy driveways, and for trying to look cooooooool. Such prosaic hardware typically goes for a couple hundred bucks, however, as Boring points out, such machines don't come with a cool sticker. And Boring's does, apparently.

Wasn't Boring supposed to be making a tunnel or something?

Given the availability of firearms and similar weapons in America, it should come as little surprise to you that real flamethrowers are legal to own and operate in most US states. California has some restrictions, of course, namely that the flame can't be more than ten feet long. In Maryland, they are banned completely.

Blow (torch) job ... Elon's latest toy

Elon's electric-powered flame-shower certainly looks legal, even in California. The gas flame looks moderately impressive but pales into insignificance compared to proper flamethrowers that shoot either jellied gasoline or ethanol.

Take, for example, the XM-42M flamethrower, legal in 48 US states and yours for a touch over double Elon's asking price. This handheld puppy shoots fuel up to 30 feet and makes the Boring Company kit look like what it is, a puny tool for puny tools.

Splash out a little more and you can pick up a X15 flamethrower, which has a backpack fuel and pressure tank. and will be delivered to your door with tanks of napalm for barbecuing flora and (hopefully not) fauna.

Then again, in just one week, Elon's SpaceX team could show us a real badass flamethrower. Its Falcon Heavy has completed its first static test burn, and a launch date has been set for February 6 from Cape Canaveral in Florida, USA.

Given the experimental lifter has to coordinate firing 27 rocket engines simultaneously, dump an electric car into orbit, and then land three boosters, we're looking at a huge opportunity for a really interesting fireworks display, folks. Musk himself has said he's hopeful it'll all go off without a hitch, or if not, that the rocket explodes high enough up to avoid damaging the launching pad.

At least the Falcon Heavy is going to be a useful piece of hardware. The Boring Company's toy is unlikely to be used for much except kicking off house fires at parties, losing rental deposits to flame damage, and causing minor burns. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • If you want to launch Starship from Texas, here's some homework, FAA tells SpaceX
    Be a good neighbor to folks and the environment, and we'll think that permit over

    SpaceX is one step closer to securing a permit to launch not just its first rocket from Boca Chica, Texas but its reusable super-heavy lifter at that.

    And by one step closer, we mean: the US Federal Aviation Administration has issued more than 75 requirements for SpaceX to fulfill, which are aimed at minimizing the environmental impact of its launches on residents and wildlife.

    Those requirements [PDF], made public Monday by the watchdog, list a series of concerns and actions SpaceX needs to take before it can hope to get the green light to use Boca Chica as intended. The FAA wants SpaceX to complete this environmental review and mitigate the effects of repeatedly launching and landing its giant reusable 120-metre Starship on the air, water, climate, peace and quiet, and land around the launchpad.

    Continue reading
  • SpaceX: 5G expansion could kill US Starlink broadband
    It would be easier to take this complaint seriously if Elon wasn't so Elon

    If the proposed addition of the 12GHz spectrum to 5G goes forward, Starlink broadband terminals across America could be crippled, or so SpaceX has complained. 

    The Elon Musk biz made the claim [PDF] this week in a filing to the FCC, which is considering allowing Dish to operate a 5G service in the 12GHz band (12.2-12.7GHz). This frequency range is also used by Starlink and others to provide over-the-air satellite internet connectivity.

    SpaceX said its own in-house study, conducted in Las Vegas, showed "harmful interference from terrestrial mobile service to SpaceX's Starlink terminals … more than 77 percent of the time, resulting in full outages 74 percent of the time." It also claimed the interference will extend to a minimum of 13 miles from base stations. In other words, if Dish gets to use these frequencies in the US, it'll render nearby Starlink terminals useless through wireless interference, it was claimed.

    Continue reading
  • SpaceX and OneWeb bury the satellite constellation hatchet
    Will play nicely in Earth orbit

    A letter has been filed with America's communications watchdog confirming that SpaceX and OneWeb, which are building mega-constellations of broadband satellites, are content to play nicely.

    The letter sweeps all the unpleasantness between the two neatly under the rug "after extensive good-faith coordination discussions." Despite what could charitably be described as snarky remarks about each other to the FCC over the years, the duo have agreed that their first-generation broadband satellite services can, after all, co-exist.

    "Their respective second-round systems can also efficiently coexist with each other while protecting their respective first-round systems," the memo, dated June 13 and shared by Reuters' journo Joey Roulette today, reads.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022