OpenSSL alpha adds TLS 1.3 support

Shambling corpse of ancient, shoddy, buggy, crypto shoved towards the grave


Developers working with OpenSSL can finally start to work with TLS 1.3, thanks to the alpha version of OpenSSL 1.1.1 that landed yesterday.

Getting TLS 1.3 into users hands and working with infrastructure has been a long, slow process: the first version of its Internet-Draft dates back to April 2014, it reached version 23 in January of this year, and there's still work to come.

As Hackers.mu developer Logan Velvindron explained to us last October, so-called “middleboxes” can still break when confronted with a TLS 1.3 session. Tests conducted by the IETF working group in December 2017 showed around a 3.25 percent failure rate of TLS 1.3 client connections.

The OpenSSL developers say version 1.1.1 is binary and API compatible with the current version, 1.1.0, so it should act as a “drop in” replacement to let developers use TLS 1.3.

Is anything that simple? Of course not – this is an alpha after all. OpenSSL's announcement says that for now version 1.1.1 “should not be used for security critical purposes”.

The big change from TLS 1.2 to TLS 1.3 is that the new version will deprecate old cryptographic algorithms entirely, instead of allowing them to be configured into an operational system.

Cloudflare blogged in September 2016 (when the optimistic hope was that the spec would be finalised by December 2016), that there's an extensive list of potential holes that the new TLS version will bury forever.

As that post explained, RSA key transport (which lacks forward secrecy), CBC mode ciphers (BEAST attacks, anyone?), the insecure RC4 stream cipher and the ancient SHA-1, a Diffie-Hellman slip up, and the FREAK/Logjam bugs are all deprecated, rather than hanging around awaiting a developer's configuration error.

There's more than TLS 1.3 in the OpenSSL release. Other features highlighted by the dev team include implementing SHA3 and multi-prime RSA; support for the SipHash set of pseudorandom functions; and a “grand redesign” of the OpenSSL random number generator. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022