Want cheaper analytics? Snub SaaS: Ye olde ELAs might do the job

And don't forget to negotiate when vendors are most desperate for cash


Pricing and licensing "are central to all data and analytics initiatives" and vendors are using organisations' enthusiasm for the field to coin it at your expense. But controlling costs is more than possible, Gartner principal analyst Etisham Zaidi said yesterday at the firm's Asia-Pacific Data and Analytics Summit in Sydney.

In a talk titled "Modern Data and Analytics Initiatives Require New Pricing Models and Negotiation Strategies" Zaidi outlined vendor tactics like "land and expand" whereby an initial engagement on a freemium price plan can quickly spread and cost big bucks. Vendors will also cash in on the fact that a new analytics initiative creates a need for tools that organisations may not already possess. Zaidi mentioned metadata management as such a requirement that creeps up on organisations excited by the prospect of better analytics but inexperienced in its operation.

Zaidi also said that vendors of SaaS analytics tools are only too happy to let you keep buying more and more seats as your needs expand - even when doing so sees the price exceed the cost of boring old three-year enterprise licence agreements. Departmental buying of analytics can have the same effect: teams that buy the same software without central control can mean an organisation collectively overpays for software that could be had for less on a central licence.

Another thing to watch is complexity being used to drive up support costs. The large number of dependencies in Hadoop, for example, means vendors of distributions have been able to ratchet up their support prices because users can't keep up with all the updating that needs to be done to keep the tool current and secure. He advised that smart organisations will negotiate flat support rates, or rates that grow only at the rate of inflation, rather than let vendors set higher price jumps.

Tiered support is another way to save some dough. Zaidi said vendors generally try to have customers sign up for the same level of support for all users. But developers don't typically work weekends, making it sensible to buy some support for their nine-to-five existence and weightier other contracts for other users.

Paying for storage and compute discretely is another tactic the analyst recommended.

He also recommended checking the capabilities of the software you already own and its potential role in an analytics project. Conventional DBMS, he said, often possesses more-than-decent unstructured-data-handling capabilities, making purchases of new software unnecessary.

Zaidi's added that buyers should do their most serious negotiations towards the end of vendors' financial years, when sales teams are under pressure to hit targets. When negotiating at such times, Zaidi advised, know your preferred vendor's key competitors and the products they offer. Mentioning those rival products will quickly produce ten to fifteen per cent discounts.

While he also advised "vendorising" requests for proposals so that vendors you fancy can respond easily, he also said buyers must never let a vendor think they're the only one left in the race for a deal. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • US won’t prosecute ‘good faith’ security researchers under CFAA
    Well, that clears things up? Maybe not.

    The US Justice Department has directed prosecutors not to charge "good-faith security researchers" with violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) if their reasons for hacking are ethical — things like bug hunting, responsible vulnerability disclosure, or above-board penetration testing.

    Good-faith, according to the policy [PDF], means using a computer "solely for purposes of good-faith testing, investigation, and/or correction of a security flaw or vulnerability."

    Additionally, this activity must be "carried out in a manner designed to avoid any harm to individuals or the public, and where the information derived from the activity is used primarily to promote the security or safety of the class of devices, machines, or online services to which the accessed computer belongs, or those who use such devices, machines, or online services."

    Continue reading
  • Intel plans immersion lab to chill its power-hungry chips
    AI chips are sucking down 600W+ and the solution could be to drown them.

    Intel this week unveiled a $700 million sustainability initiative to try innovative liquid and immersion cooling technologies to the datacenter.

    The project will see Intel construct a 200,000-square-foot "mega lab" approximately 20 miles west of Portland at its Hillsboro campus, where the chipmaker will qualify, test, and demo its expansive — and power hungry — datacenter portfolio using a variety of cooling tech.

    Alongside the lab, the x86 giant unveiled an open reference design for immersion cooling systems for its chips that is being developed by Intel Taiwan. The chip giant is hoping to bring other Taiwanese manufacturers into the fold and it'll then be rolled out globally.

    Continue reading
  • US recovers a record $15m from the 3ve ad-fraud crew
    Swiss banks cough up around half of the proceeds of crime

    The US government has recovered over $15 million in proceeds from the 3ve digital advertising fraud operation that cost businesses more than $29 million for ads that were never viewed.

    "This forfeiture is the largest international cybercrime recovery in the history of the Eastern District of New York," US Attorney Breon Peace said in a statement

    The action, Peace added, "sends a powerful message to those involved in cyber fraud that there are no boundaries to prosecuting these bad actors and locating their ill-gotten assets wherever they are in the world."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022