Spotify wants to go public but can't find Ed Sheeran (to pay him)

Nor Drake. Nor Bruno Mars. You'd think they weren't trying very hard

Analysis Spotify has ended five years of speculation about an IPO, and has filed for a public share offering likely to make its founders – and large record labels – extremely rich indeed.

But although that giant payday is built on the back of songwriters' "sweat and precog"*, Spotify still has trouble finding them to pay them. Even when they're as world famous as Ed Sheeran**.

The cash that Spotify has such difficulty handing over is the mechanical royalty. This is the payment that goes to a songwriter or composer when music is sold or streamed. Songwriters also get a separate performance royalty.

Traditionally mechanicals were handed over by the record company to the Harry Fox Agency, which then paid the writers.

For more than a year, music services have been exploiting a loophole in US copyright law. Instead of sending a cheque for mechanical royalties, they've been filing a statutory "notice of intention" to pay them instead. The NOI is a piece of paper which isn't redeemable for cash. (The curious can peruse the most recent NOI filings – and Spotify is not alone in filing them! – with the Licensing Division of the US Copyright Office here**).

Millions of NOIs have now been filed. How come?

Kevin the Teenager as played by Harry Enfield


Amazingly, the law does not oblige the user of the music, Spotify, to do a diligent search on who wrote it. Nor does the law oblige them to maintain and use their own records. So you can be sure that Spotify knows exactly how to find Ed Sheeran to pay him his performance royalty. However, in a display of insolence that Kevin The Stroppy Teenager (pictured) would envy, it manages not to find Ed Sheeran to pay him his mechanical royalty. Ed who?

In this instance Sheeran – we're using him because he's famous – registered his details with performing rights society BMI. But Spotify isn't obliged to look at that BMI data. Instead, it only needs to have a quick rifle through the records kept by the US Copyright Office. These records are decrepit, and months out of date.

(You may wonder why any artist needs to register anything at all with the US Copyright office, a body which has few direct counterparts in the rest of the world, since copyright is automatic under the Berne Convention – no registration is required to receive protection. But that's a long story that need not concern us here.)

Sheeran contact info at BMI

Fancy that: Ed Sheeran is quite easy to find after all. Snapshot of the BMI database

In the words of attorney Chris Castle [fascinating interview from 2010] it's another safe harbour for Big Tech. Just one caused by poor law and regulatory incompetence. Castle matched the Billboard Top 100 and found the music services had lodged NOIs for many of the most successful artists – Bruno Mars, for example, and Drake. "Not one of Google, Amazon, Spotify, or iHeart could find any of the copyright owners of any of the songs in the Top 5 for the last seven weeks," he found.

"Is it really correct for services to be able to burden the Copyright Office with these mass filings for songs that are already subject to a voluntary licence? Which gives them actual knowledge of the song copyright owner?" he asks.

"In almost every case," he told The Reg over email this week, "the song that Spotify says it can't find in the Copyright Office records is easily findable in the PRO databases, which are searchable for free and are almost always updated before the song is released. But Spotify is not required to look anywhere but the Copyright Office records based on a law from 1976 that was rarely used. In April 2016 [after a class-action suit was launched] the services suddenly started filing millions of NOIs and continue to do so."

As much as 25 per cent of the royalties owed to composers may be missing, we noted here, citing National Music Publishers' Association (NMPA) president David Israelite.


Spotify just can't wash those songwriters out of its hair


Castle has a policy point to add: the Music Modernisation Act doesn't address the mess by obliging the user to do a half-decent search. Well-meaning policy makers are barking up the wrong tree, one well-informed insider concurred, writing (anonymously) on The Reg earlier this week in a pithy overview of music licensing.

Collective licensing was once justifiable, our commenter notes, when the cost of figuring out who should get paid for what exceeded the pay available. "It's a relic of the analogue era. Nowadays it's possible, via metadata, to log exactly what got played to whom, when, and for rightsholders to be paid accurately."

"Follow the money," he/she typed ruefully. "It mostly ends up in Mountain View."

The Music Modernisation Act obliges the industry to create a global rights database, an enormously complex undertaking. However, several previous attempts to create one have ended in failure – and the people with the cash have all the data they need already to pay the writers.

"The moral of the story is that you can't find what you don't look for," Castle told us.

It is worth noting that, historically, the major labels did the accounting, and passed on the mechanicals to their signed artists. They couldn't afford to piss them off too much: artists had managers and publishers and were likely to remember non-payment when at contract renewal time. These days, of course, the artist-money broker relationship is very different. Artists aren't signed to Spotify or Google. The remaining three major labels are significant shareholders set to net hundreds of millions in revenue from the Spotify IPO – and we don't hear much of a noise from that corner.

Yesterday afternoon we invited Spotify to comment , but had not received a response at the time of press. ®


*The description English post-punk artist Mark E Smith (The Fall) used for his work.

** According to nonprofit rights society Soundexchange's artist lookup tool SXWorks - which makes searchable the publicly available (electronically filed) NOIs – Spotify filed an NOI for Sheeran's song "Galway Girl" the day this article was published.

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • North Korea pulled in $400m in cryptocurrency heists last year – report

    Plus: FIFA 22 players lose their identity and Texas gets phony QR codes

    In brief Thieves operating for the North Korean government made off with almost $400m in digicash last year in a concerted attack to steal and launder as much currency as they could.

    A report from blockchain biz Chainalysis found that attackers were going after investment houses and currency exchanges in a bid to purloin funds and send them back to the Glorious Leader's coffers. They then use mixing software to make masses of micropayments to new wallets, before consolidating them all again into a new account and moving the funds.

    Bitcoin used to be a top target but Ether is now the most stolen currency, say the researchers, accounting for 58 per cent of the funds filched. Bitcoin accounted for just 20 per cent, a fall of more than 50 per cent since 2019 - although part of the reason might be that they are now so valuable people are taking more care with them.

    Continue reading
  • Tesla Full Self-Driving videos prompt California's DMV to rethink policy on accidents

    Plus: AI systems can identify different chess players by their moves and more

    In brief California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said it’s “revisiting” its opinion of whether Tesla’s so-called Full Self-Driving feature needs more oversight after a series of videos demonstrate how the technology can be dangerous.

    “Recent software updates, videos showing dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the opinions of other experts in this space,” have made the DMV think twice about Tesla, according to a letter sent to California’s Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), chair of the Senate’s transportation committee, and first reported by the LA Times.

    Tesla isn’t required to report the number of crashes to California’s DMV unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo or Cruise because it operates at lower levels of autonomy and requires human supervision. But that may change after videos like drivers having to take over to avoid accidentally swerving into pedestrians crossing the road or failing to detect a truck in the middle of the road continue circulating.

    Continue reading
  • Alien life on Super-Earth can survive longer than us due to long-lasting protection from cosmic rays

    Laser experiments show their magnetic fields shielding their surfaces from radiation last longer

    Life on Super-Earths may have more time to develop and evolve, thanks to their long-lasting magnetic fields protecting them against harmful cosmic rays, according to new research published in Science.

    Space is a hazardous environment. Streams of charged particles traveling at very close to the speed of light, ejected from stars and distant galaxies, bombard planets. The intense radiation can strip atmospheres and cause oceans on planetary surfaces to dry up over time, leaving them arid and incapable of supporting habitable life. Cosmic rays, however, are deflected away from Earth, however, since it’s shielded by its magnetic field.

    Now, a team of researchers led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) believe that Super-Earths - planets that are more massive than Earth but less than Neptune - may have magnetic fields too. Their defensive bubbles, in fact, are estimated to stay intact for longer than the one around Earth, meaning life on their surfaces will have more time to develop and survive.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022