Any social media accounts to declare? US wants travelers to tell

The State Department seeks to expand its social media vetting beyond flagged visa applicants


The US Department of State wants to ask visa applicants to provide details on the social media accounts they've used in the past five years, as well as telephone numbers, email addresses, and international travel during this period.

The plan, if approved by the Office of Management and Budget, will expand the vetting regime applied to those flagged for extra immigration scrutiny – rolled out last year – to every immigrant visa applicant and to non-immigrant visa applicants such as business travelers and tourists.

The Department of State published its notice of request for public comment in the Federal Register on Friday. The comment process concludes on May 29, 2018.

The notice explains that the Department of State wants to expand the information it collects by adding questions to its Electronic Application for Immigrant Visa and Alien Registration (DS-260).

The online form will provide a list of social media platforms – presumably the major ones – and "requires the applicant to provide any identifiers used by applicants for those platforms during the five years preceding the date of application."

For social media platforms not on the list, visa applicants "will be given the option to provide information."

The Department of State says that the form "will be submitted electronically over an encrypted connection to the Department via the internet," as if to offer reassurance that it will be able to store the data securely.

It's perhaps worth noting that Russian hackers penetrated the Department of State's email system in 2014, and in 2016, the State Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) gave the agency dismal marks for both its physical and cybersecurity competency.

The Department of State estimates that its revised visa process will affect 710,000 immigrant visa applicants attempting to enter the US; its more limited review of travelers flagged for additional screening only affected an estimated 65,000 people.

But around 10 million non-immigrant visa applicants who seek to come to the US can also look forward to social media screening.

In a statement emailed to The Register, a State Department spokesperson said the proposed changes follow from President Trump's March 2017 Memorandum and Executive Order 13780 and reflect the need for screening standards to address emerging threats.

"Under this proposal, nearly all US visa applicants will be asked to provide additional information, including their social media identifiers, prior passport numbers, information about family members, and a longer history of past travel, employment, and contact information than is collected in current visa application forms," the spokesperson said.

The Department of State already collects limited contact information, travel history, family member information, and previous addresses from all visa applicants, the spokesperson said.

The handful of comments submitted so far decry the proposed changes.

I strongly disagree with these changes as they presume guilt of every individual applying for a visa," writes an individual posting under the name Malia Robinson. "I could not possibly remember all the information that is asked for, therefore setting the possibility for entrapment due to simple forgetfulness. This will deter foreign citizens from wanting to come to the US, which will have potentially profound impacts on economic sectors, research and industry, thus creating threats to the US that are likely to outweigh the speculative threat of 'terrorism.' This is regressive and xenophobic posturing that is akin to something we would see in authoritarian regimes. It is fundamentally un-American.

®

Similar topics

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Minimal, systemd-free Alpine Linux releases version 3.16
    A widespread distro that many of its users don't even know they have

    Version 3.16.0 of Alpine Linux is out – one of the most significant of the many lightweight distros.

    Version 3.16.0 is worth a look, especially if you want to broaden your skills.

    Alpine is interesting because it's not just another me-too distro. It bucks a lot of the trends in modern Linux, and while it's not the easiest to set up, it's a great deal easier to get it working than it was a few releases ago.

    Continue reading
  • Verizon: Ransomware sees biggest jump in five years
    We're only here for DBIRs

    The cybersecurity landscape continues to expand and evolve rapidly, fueled in large part by the cat-and-mouse game between miscreants trying to get into corporate IT environments and those hired by enterprises and security vendors to keep them out.

    Despite all that, Verizon's annual security breach report is again showing that there are constants in the field, including that ransomware continues to be a fast-growing threat and that the "human element" still plays a central role in most security breaches, whether it's through social engineering, bad decisions, or similar.

    According to the US carrier's 2022 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) released this week [PDF], ransomware accounted for 25 percent of the observed security incidents that occurred between November 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, and was present in 70 percent of all malware infections. Ransomware outbreaks increased 13 percent year-over-year, a larger increase than the previous five years combined.

    Continue reading
  • Slack-for-engineers Mattermost on open source and data sovereignty
    Control and access are becoming a hot button for orgs

    Interview "It's our data, it's our intellectual property. Being able to migrate it out those systems is near impossible... It was a real frustration for us."

    These were the words of communication and collaboration platform Mattermost's founder and CTO, Corey Hulen, speaking to The Register about open source, sovereignty and audio bridges.

    "Some of the history of Mattermost is exactly that problem," says Hulen of the issue of closed source software. "We were using proprietary tools – we were not a collaboration platform before, we were a games company before – [and] we were extremely frustrated because we couldn't get our intellectual property out of those systems..."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022