Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Australian Signals Directorate won't become domestic snoops

Unauthorised leak of non-proposal referred to the Feds. Wait, what?

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) says it's investigating the leak of sensitive government documents outlining a plan the government says doesn't exist and won't be implemented.

The Official Kerfuffle began when Australian Murdoch organ The Daily Telegraph published a story (unlinked because it's behind a paywall) alleging that public servants were proposing to give the sigint agency the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) power to spy on Australians in Australia.

Under its current arrangements, the ASD does not collect information on Australian citizens.

The Telegraph also reported that Home Affairs minister Peter Dutton wanted the ASD moved from the Department of Defence to his department.

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation wrote on Sunday that it had confirmed the substance of the News Limited report.

The proposal, if it had existed, would have given the ASD a brief to access Australians' Internet services and banking information.

Members of Australia's opposition Labor party all-but-accused someone in the government of leaking the report to the Telegraph.

The government moved to squash the report.

Foreign Affairs Minister Julie Bishop sent the ABC a statement saying “there is no such plan” and adding that she did not believe there is a “national security gap” that would justify the ASD becoming a local spy agency.

The secretaries of the three agencies involved – defence, home affairs, and the ASD – issued a joint statement denying that any such proposal existed.

“In relation to today’s media claim, there is no proposal to increase the ASD’s powers to collect intelligence on Australians or to covertly access their private data”, the statement said.

“The cyber security function entails protecting Australians from cyber-enabled crime and cyber-attacks, and not collecting intelligence on Australians. These are two distinct functions, technically and operationally”, the statement added.

The ABC added that Defence Secretary Greg Moriarty has referred the leak to AFP Commissioner Andrew Colvin. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like