Twitter signs for Google cloud at list price of about $10m a month

Shifts Hadoop clusters and their 300PB of data, not the stuff that lets you tweet

Twitter’s announced that it’s moving a lot of stuff to Google’s cloud, but it’s not all good news for Google.

The avian network has announced that “cold data storage and our flexible compute Hadoop clusters” are off to Google.

That announcement mentions “more than 300PB of data across tens of thousands of servers”, so The Register fed Google’s handy cloud price calculator 300PB of cold storage and 20,000 mid-range servers.

Here’s the quote that came back:

Google cloud quote for twitter

The Register imagines that Twitter will pay nowhere near the US$9,969,209.60 quoted: Google’s known to covet and pursue big customers. It’s doubtless happy to have a 300PB-and-thousads-of-servers client aboard.

But this isn’t total victory for Google. We know this because when Twitter recently revealed details of its infrastructure it detailed “tens of thousands of hosts” for various applications that and the fact that Twitter ran some of its Apache Mesos and Aurora implementations in AWS.

Google therefore appears to have won a slice of Twitter’s business, but there’s plenty more Twitter infrastructure elsewhere, too. And that infrastructure, not Hadoop, is what does the Tweeting.

Google’s therefore won some business that’s doubtless important, but probably isn’t life or death for the Twitter service.

To further dampen the joy for Google, multi-cloud strategies are now utterly ordinary. Organisations are routinely advised not to put all their eggs in one cloudy basket, but instead to shop around and buy the stuff that makes most sense to them regardless of which cloud offers it.

Google’s cloud also remains a solid third-ranked cloud behind AWS and Azure, both in terms of revenue and mindshare. Sessions your correspondent attended at this week’s Gartner Infrastructure, Operations Management and Data Center Summit tended to mention Google and IBM in passing, but focussed on Azure and AWS. Perhaps a few more Twitter-sized clients might change that. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • SpaceX staff condemn Musk's behavior in open letter
    Well, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see why

    A group of employees at SpaceX wrote an open letter to COO and president Gwynne Shotwell denouncing owner Elon Musk's public behavior and calling for the rocket company to "swiftly and explicitly separate itself" from his personal brand.

    The letter, which was acquired through anonymous SpaceX sources, calls Musk's recent behavior in the public sphere a source of distraction and embarrassment. Musk's tweets, the writers argue, are de facto company statements because "Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX."

    Musk's freewheeling tweets have landed him in hot water on multiple occasions – one incident even leaving him unable to tweet about Tesla without a lawyer's review and approval. 

    Continue reading
  • GPUs aren’t always your best bet, Twitter ML tests suggest
    Graphcore processor outperforms Nvidia rival in team's experiments

    GPUs are a powerful tool for machine-learning workloads, though they’re not necessarily the right tool for every AI job, according to Michael Bronstein, Twitter’s head of graph learning research.

    His team recently showed Graphcore’s AI hardware offered an “order of magnitude speedup when comparing a single IPU processor to an Nvidia A100 GPU,” in temporal graph network (TGN) models.

    “The choice of hardware for implementing Graph ML models is a crucial, yet often overlooked problem,” reads a joint article penned by Bronstein with Emanuele Rossi, an ML researcher at Twitter, and Daniel Justus, a researcher at Graphcore.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022