Oracle tells tales about Google data slurps to Australian regulator

At an inquiry into news and ads, of all things. Is Big Red playing a deeper game?


Oracle has “provided information … about Google services” to Australian regulators.

News Limited organs in Australia on Monday reported that Oracle staffers travelled to Australia to present at the Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC’s) Digital platforms inquiry.

That inquiry will “look at the effect that digital search engines, social media platforms and other digital content aggregation platforms have on competition in media and advertising services markets.” The probe will also “look at the impact of digital platforms on the supply of news and journalistic content and the implications of this for media content creators, advertisers and consumers.”

The ACCC told The Register “We are looking at the practices of digital platforms including Google and Facebook as part of our digital platforms inquiry.” Which we knew – Google and Facebook are prime reasons the inquiry was called into being.

But the regulator also said it “met with Oracle and is considering information it has provided about Google services” and is “exploring how much consumers know about the use of location data and are working closely with the Privacy Commissioner.”

None of which really sounds like Oracle’s concern. The company does sell data but has no advertising business to speak of.

So why has Big Red bothered?

Oracle recently won a long-running dispute with Google over the latter company’s use of Java in Android. And News Limited’s reports say Oracle demonstrated that Android devices send up to a gigabyte of month of data back to Google, the better to help it target ads.

Which sounds a little odd because uploading that volume of data would surely be noticed, especially on devices that don't have WiFi connections as mobile data is expensive down under.

The reports also said that Oracle showed its research to some media (Not The Register - Oracle recently took three weeks to reject our request for a briefing on Solaris 11.4). The company’s choice of News Limited was wise, because The House That Rupert Built has a long history of trying to take Google down a peg. Indeed, its submission (PDF) to the Digital Platforms Inquiry includes many criticisms of Google and Facebook on grounds that they need News’ content but seek to undermine it, lure away its advertisers and disrupt its relationships with readers.

An Oracle spokesperson told The Register “Unfortunately at this time we have ‘no comment’.”

The inquiry is required to deliver its final report by June 3rd, 2019. ®


Other stories you might like

  • End of the road for biz living off free G Suite legacy edition
    Firms accustomed to freebies miffed that web giant's largess doesn't last

    After offering free G Suite apps for more than a decade, Google next week plans to discontinue its legacy service – which hasn't been offered to new customers since 2012 – and force business users to transition to a paid subscription for the service's successor, Google Workspace.

    "For businesses, the G Suite legacy free edition will no longer be available after June 27, 2022," Google explains in its support document. "Your account will be automatically transitioned to a paid Google Workspace subscription where we continue to deliver new capabilities to help businesses transform the way they work."

    Small business owners who have relied on the G Suite legacy free edition aren't thrilled that they will have to pay for Workspace or migrate to a rival like Microsoft, which happens to be actively encouraging defectors. As noted by The New York Times on Monday, the approaching deadline has elicited complaints from small firms that bet on Google's cloud productivity apps in the 2006-2012 period and have enjoyed the lack of billing since then.

    Continue reading
  • Google has more reasons why it doesn't like antitrust law that affects Google
    It'll ruin Gmail, claims web ads giant

    Google has a fresh list of reasons why it opposes tech antitrust legislation making its way through Congress but, like others who've expressed discontent, the ad giant's complaints leave out mention of portions of the proposed law that address said gripes.

    The law bill in question is S.2992, the Senate version of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA), which is closer than ever to getting votes in the House and Senate, which could see it advanced to President Biden's desk.

    AICOA prohibits tech companies above a certain size from favoring their own products and services over their competitors. It applies to businesses considered "critical trading partners," meaning the company controls access to a platform through which business users reach their customers. Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta in one way or another seemingly fall under the scope of this US legislation. 

    Continue reading
  • Makers of ad blockers and browser privacy extensions fear the end is near
    Overhaul of Chrome add-ons set for January, Google says it's for all our own good

    Special report Seven months from now, assuming all goes as planned, Google Chrome will drop support for its legacy extension platform, known as Manifest v2 (Mv2). This is significant if you use a browser extension to, for instance, filter out certain kinds of content and safeguard your privacy.

    Google's Chrome Web Store is supposed to stop accepting Mv2 extension submissions sometime this month. As of January 2023, Chrome will stop running extensions created using Mv2, with limited exceptions for enterprise versions of Chrome operating under corporate policy. And by June 2023, even enterprise versions of Chrome will prevent Mv2 extensions from running.

    The anticipated result will be fewer extensions and less innovation, according to several extension developers.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022