Android devs prepare to hit pause on ads amid Google GDPR chaos

Hey Google. How will we eat?


Android developers are reluctantly considering putting Google ads on ice because of uncertainty over whether they'll be GDPR-compliant, cutting off what in many cases is their sole revenue source.

With 10 days to go before GDPR, developers told us they are still waiting for an SDK that Google promised them, one they can't actually implement until the deadline expires.

As we reported mid-last week, Google plunged developers who rely on its Admob system for revenue into uncertainty close to a fortnight before the EU's new privacy laws go into place.

Some devs have mulled whether they would need to change their business model as Google didn't specify what information would actually be presented. Google promised a new Consent SDK, but warned it couldn't actually be tested until after GDPR was in place.

Developers assumed that if they implemented the SDK, they'd meet regulations. Maybe not, however. Adding further confusion, a Google rep said in the Mobile Ads forum that the company couldn't guarantee that apps using the Consent SDK would actually be compliant.

Unfortunately I am unable to advise if your apps will be GPDR compliant. However, obviously if you are not requesting ads using the Google Ads SDK then you should not have need to ask for consent to serve Google ads. If you are requesting ads and you have not collected consent using the Google Consent SDK, then we advise that if a user's consent state is unknown and an ad request is made, Google will still serve personalized ads. Google recognizes that app developers may have different ways of tracking consent of which Google may not be aware, and at this time Google will rely on developers to comply with their obligations under the EU user consent policy.

One developer mused: "So if you don't have a solution in place before next Friday you will have to turn off your Admob account. Do we know how much money that will likely cost Google?"

And a reader has noted that Google's advice contravenes ICO guidelines, which state that organisations should "avoid making consent to processing a precondition of a service".

After we covered the developments last week, Google provided us with a statement for publishers.

"We created the Ad Technology Provider controls so that every publisher that uses our ad technology has the ability to select their preferred providers. Publishers decide which providers they want to work with and the number of vendors they want to select. If they decide not to make a selection, we will apply a list of the most commonly used providers based on those that generate the most revenue for publishers.

El Reg asked for further clarification from Google last week and again today but have yet to hear back from the giant ad-slinger. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Cuba ransomware gang scores almost $44m in ransom payments across 49 orgs, say Feds

    Hancitor is at play

    The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) says 49 organisations, including some in government, were hit by Cuba ransomware as of early November this year.

    The attacks were spread across five "critical infrastructure", which, besides government, included the financial, healthcare, manufacturing, and – as you'd expect – IT sectors. The Feds said late last week the threat actors are demanding $76m in ransoms and have already received at least $43.9m in payments.

    The ransomware gang's loader of choice, Hancitor, was the culprit, distributed via phishing emails, or via exploit of Microsoft Exchange vulnerabilities, compromised credentials, or Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) tools. Hancitor – also known as Chanitor or Tordal –  enables a CobaltStrike beacon as a service on the victim's network using a legitimate Windows service like PowerShell.

    Continue reading
  • Graviton 3: AWS attempts to gain silicon advantage with latest custom hardware

    Key to faster, more predictable cloud

    RE:INVENT AWS had a conviction that "modern processors were not well optimized for modern workloads," the cloud corp's senior veep of Infrastructure, Peter DeSantis, claimed at its latest annual Re:invent gathering in Las Vegas.

    DeSantis was speaking last week about AWS's Graviton 3 Arm-based processor, providing a bit more meat around the bones, so to speak – and in his comment the word "modern" is doing a lot of work.

    The computing landscape looks different from the perspective of a hyperscale cloud provider; what counts is not flexibility but intensive optimization and predictable performance.

    Continue reading
  • The Omicron dilemma: Google goes first on delaying office work

    Hurrah, employees can continue to work from home and take calls in pyjamas

    Googlers can continue working from home and will no longer be required to return to campuses on 10 January 2022 as previously expected.

    The decision marks another delay in getting more employees back to their desks. For Big Tech companies, setting a firm return date during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a nightmare. All attempts were pushed back so far due to rising numbers of cases or new variants of the respiratory disease spreading around the world, such as the new Omicron strain.

    Google's VP of global security, Chris Rackow, broke the news to staff in a company-wide email, first reported by CNBC. He said Google would wait until the New Year to figure out when campuses in the US can safely reopen for a mandatory return.

    Continue reading
  • This House believes: A unified, agnostic software environment can be achieved

    How long will we keep reinventing software wheels?

    Register Debate Welcome to the latest Register Debate in which writers discuss technology topics, and you the reader choose the winning argument. The format is simple: we propose a motion, the arguments for the motion will run this Monday and Wednesday, and the arguments against on Tuesday and Thursday. During the week you can cast your vote on which side you support using the poll embedded below, choosing whether you're in favour or against the motion. The final score will be announced on Friday, revealing whether the for or against argument was most popular.

    This week's motion is: A unified, agnostic software environment can be achieved. We debate the question: can the industry ever have a truly open, unified, agnostic software environment in HPC and AI that can span multiple kinds of compute engines?

    Our first contributor arguing FOR the motion is Nicole Hemsoth, co-editor of The Next Platform.

    Continue reading
  • Sun sets: Oracle to close Scotland's Linlithgow datacentre

    Questions for tenants as Ellison's gang executes its OCI strategy

    Oracle's datacentre in Linlithgow, Scotland is set to close over the next few months, leaving clients faced with a cloud migration or a move to an alternative hosted datacentre.

    According to multiple insiders speaking to The Register, Oracle has been trying to move its datacentre clients to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure – with mixed results.

    The Linlithgow facility dates back to the days of Sun Microsystems, which opened a manufacturing plant there in 1990.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021