Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Australia’s SigInt spooks may be turned inwards after all

It turns out they’re the only intelligence agency with cyber-offensive capabilities

The Australian Signals Directorate, the nation’s signals intelligence agency, may be turned inwards after all.

Home Affairs minister Peter Dutton told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s 730 that the Directorate (ASD) may be used to defend critical infrastructure such as the financial system or emergency services hotlines.

Interestingly, Dutton said the ASD is the right agency for the job because it has offensive capabilities that other Australian intelligence bodies lack.

"If we have someone at the moment who is streaming live content of a child being sexually abused online and the server is run out of somewhere else in world, ASD does have capacity to go online to disrupt and take down that particular server,” Dutton told the program, adding that other agencies could not do likewise for servers on Australian soil.

“My question is: should we have the capacity — whether it is through the ASD or somewhere else, but that technical capacity which doesn't exist domestically at the moment — should we be able to call on that, given the reality of the threat, the amount of time people are going to be spending online?”

Hacker

Oz infosec spooks: ease back on the “cybers”, this is serious

READ MORE

Dutton’s remarks re-enforce his recent rebuttal of reports in News Limited organs that suggested ASD could be used to spy on citizens.

The minister did not outline when the ASD might be turned inwards, but the mechanism by which it could be was revealed today in the form of a review of Australia’s national intelligence legislation. The review was billed as necessary due to the changing nature of threats to national security and the fact that current laws were passed in 1979 and 2001.

The review will consider legislation impacting Australia’s Department of Home Affairs, Australian Federal Police, Australian Transactional Report Analysis Centre and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. The ASD is a Department of Defence concern, but it’s not hard to imagine the review suggesting its capabilities be extended to one of the abovementioned agencies. ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like