Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

ZTE can't buy chips from America – but can still get sued for patent infringement in the US

America('s lawsuits) First

Chinese phone maker ZTE will have to face a patent infringement lawsuit in the US, despite its handsets being effectively barred from sale in America.

On Wednesday a Northern Texas US District Court judge tossed the Chinese company's motion to dismiss a patent infringement case filed by a Texas-based mobile software developer.

Seven Networks has alleged that ZTE's firmware borrows from seven patents it holds regarding data transfers, battery management, and notifications.

The patents are:

  • US Patent 8,811,952 "Mobile device power management in data synchronization over a mobile network with or without a trigger notification."
  • US Patent 9,247,019 "Mobile application traffic optimization."
  • US Patent 9,325,600 "Offloading application traffic to a shared communication channel for signal optimization in a wireless network for traffic utilizing proprietary and non-proprietary protocols."
  • US Patent 9,351,254 "Method for power saving in mobile devices by optimizing wakelocks."
  • US Patent 9,516,127 "Intelligent alarm manipulator and resource tracker."
  • US Patent 9,516,129 "Mobile application traffic optimization."
  • US Patent 9,553,816 "Optimizing mobile network traffic coordination across multiple applications running on a mobile device."

Seven's complaint alleges that ZTE devices, most notably its Blade smartphone, use parts of all seven patents to manage its battery life and handle notifications and data transfers. Now, Seven wants a trial to determine how much it is owed.

Tourist in Beijing China

US-China trade war is back on: White House repeats threat to tax Middle Kingdom imports

READ MORE

ZTE had countered with a motion to dismiss, arguing that as its US headquarters are incorporated in New Jersey, the Northern Texas District Court does not have jurisdiction for a patent case.

Judge Barbara Lynn, however, was having none of that. Noting that federal law simply requires a company do business in a district to establish jurisdiction, Lynn denied ZTE's motion and ruled that the case would go ahead.

The ruling puts ZTE in the odd position of having to face a lawsuit in a place it is also blocked from doing business in. The company had to suspend operations after the US Department of Justice placed a ban on US exports to the Chinese tech vendor.

That ruling could soon be lifted but, for the time being, ZTE is not allowed to do business with US companies. It has since announced that it's halting phone production until it sorts out the issue.

Apparently, that doesn't extend to lawsuits. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like