New York State is trying to ban 'deepfakes' and Hollywood isn't happy

Disney and NBCUniversal say the new bill is potentially unconstitutional

Several Hollywood companies have rallied against a bill that would ban the creation of fake pornographic videos made using AI.

Bill A08155, filed by the New York State Assembly on May 31, looks like the first legal step taken to combat ‘deepfakes’, a technique that alters videos by stitching other people’s faces often onto the bodies of adult actresses.

The technology gained traction when it was discovered that a Reddit message board r/deepfakes had been quietly growing. It was a place where internet onanists shared tips and tricks on how to make the best, most realistic fake skin flicks and posted their results. Reddit has since updated its rules to forbid any potential sexual content involving minors.

The bill goes further and isn’t just aimed at protecting minors. It fights for “the right of privacy and the right of publicity” for anyone alive or dead.

“An individual's persona is the personal property of the individual and is freely transferable and descendible,” the bill reads. So crafting a “digital replica” for films, adverts, musicals, for commercial purposes or without explicit written consent is violation of an individual’s rights.

Anyone who knowingly makes these fake videos should be considered to be committing fraud and should be liable to pay damages to the victim.

Mark Wahlberg and his come-to-life teddy bear in bed in the movie Ted. Copyright: Universal Pictures

It took us less than 30 seconds to find banned 'deepfake' AI smut on the internet


It means that deepfakes also falls under this category. “Use of a digital replica of an individual shall constitute a violation if done without the consent of the individual if the use is in an audiovisual pornographic work in a manner that is intended to create and that does create the impression that the individual represented by the digital replica is performing,” the proposed law states

Entertainment companies like Disney, NBCUniversal and several others represented by the trade association The Motion Picture Ass. of America (MPAA) have hit back, declaring the bill to be too restrictive to creativity and storytelling. It would make biopics about actors, musicians, or athletes impossible, according to an memorandum written by the MPAA.

Disney and the MPAA both believe that deepfakes are a pressing problem, but that tackling it in this way was potentially unconstitutional, violating the First Amendment which protects free speech from government regulation.

A letter written by Lisa Pitney, vice president of government relations at Disney to the New York State Senators, said: “If adopted, this legislation would interfere with the right and ability of companies like ours to tell stories about real people and events. The public has an interest in those stories, and the First Amendment protects those who tell them.”

NBCUniversal argues that it doesn’t believe there is an actual pressing problem involving unauthorized “digital replicas” of people that warrants rushed legislative intervention,” according to the memo [PDF] it drafted.

But if the bill were to pass it’d make the creating of content in New York much more risky compared to other jurisdictions. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Microsoft promises to tighten access to AI it now deems too risky for some devs
    Deep-fake voices, face recognition, emotion, age and gender prediction ... A toolbox of theoretical tech tyranny

    Microsoft has pledged to clamp down on access to AI tools designed to predict emotions, gender, and age from images, and will restrict the usage of its facial recognition and generative audio models in Azure.

    The Windows giant made the promise on Tuesday while also sharing its so-called Responsible AI Standard, a document [PDF] in which the US corporation vowed to minimize any harm inflicted by its machine-learning software. This pledge included assurances that the biz will assess the impact of its technologies, document models' data and capabilities, and enforce stricter use guidelines.

    This is needed because – and let's just check the notes here – there are apparently not enough laws yet regulating machine-learning technology use. Thus, in the absence of this legislation, Microsoft will just have to force itself to do the right thing.

    Continue reading
  • If AI chatbots are sentient, they can be squirrels, too
    Plus: FTC warns against using ML for automatic content moderation, and more

    In Brief No, AI chatbots are not sentient.

    Just as soon as the story on a Google engineer, who blew the whistle on what he claimed was a sentient language model, went viral, multiple publications stepped in to say he's wrong.

    The debate on whether the company's LaMDA chatbot is conscious or has a soul or not isn't a very good one, just because it's too easy to shut down the side that believes it does. Like most large language models, LaMDA has billions of parameters and was trained on text scraped from the internet. The model learns the relationships between words, and which ones are more likely to appear next to each other.

    Continue reading
  • AMD touts big datacenter, AI ambitions in CPU-GPU roadmap
    Epyc future ahead, along with Instinct, Ryzen, Radeon and custom chip push

    After taking serious CPU market share from Intel over the last few years, AMD has revealed larger ambitions in AI, datacenters and other areas with an expanded roadmap of CPUs, GPUs and other kinds of chips for the near future.

    These ambitions were laid out at AMD's Financial Analyst Day 2022 event on Thursday, where it signaled intentions to become a tougher competitor for Intel, Nvidia and other chip companies with a renewed focus on building better and faster chips for servers and other devices, becoming a bigger player in AI, enabling applications with improved software, and making more custom silicon.  

    "These are where we think we can win in terms of differentiation," AMD CEO Lisa Su said in opening remarks at the event. "It's about compute technology leadership. It's about expanding datacenter leadership. It's about expanding our AI footprint. It's expanding our software capability. And then it's really bringing together a broader custom solutions effort because we think this is a growth area going forward."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022