Atari accuses El Reg of professional trolling and making stuff up. Welp, here's the interview tape for you to decide...

We're so very sorry that we found the MP3. Sad

Legendary games company Atari has accused a Register reporter of making stuff up and acting unprofessionally following an interview earlier this year in San Francisco at the launch of its new games console, the Atari VCS.

In that article, we were critical of the fact that the machine did not work, and that its chief operating officer Michael Arzt, whom we spoke to, appeared unable to answer even the most basic questions about the product. We were shown "engineering design models" that did not work, and pointed out as much.

Subsequently, a potential buyer of a Atari VCS posted a link to the article on the company's Facebook page, and asked the biz to explain it. Atari responded:

We honestly can't explain that article either. Our executives sat with that reporter for half an hour and he wrote what he wanted instead of what was discussed with him. Sadly there are even irresponsible trolls in 'professional' positions i guess.

We clearly said that we were bringing engineering design models to GDC and lots of people clearly don't understand what that means. Hunks of plastic? Well, yeah, that's how you finalize the designs and confirm that you can get the look and feel you want for the finished products. Sad.

While we at The Register often take a light-hearted and critical perspective on the news of the day, we take our professional obligations as reporters very seriously.

In that capacity, we would like to formally apologize to both Atari and Michael Arzt for digging out a recording of the interview – and for the following article in which we highlight that Atari is so full of crap that it should be designated a hazardous waste zone.

You can find the entire 30-minute interview at the bottom, but here are a few short clips covering the most salient parts.

Strap in, here we go

In the article, we wrote: "What happens if we plug this into our laptop, we ask Mike. I don't know, he says. Will it work? I don't know. If we plug it into a different games machine, will it work? No. So it's custom hardware and software? I don't know about that."

Presumably this is where Atari feels that the reporter "wrote what he wanted instead of what was discussed with him."

Which makes this clip tough to explain – and we'll give you a clue: your humble Reg hack is the one with the British accent...

This is a clip of Atari having no idea about its own controller

In the article, we note: "Mike tries to tell us that big product launches are suspended all the time. We tell him they really aren't, and on the rare occasion that they are, the company goes out of its way to explain why and give a new launch timeline."

Just another example of professional trolling? We'll leave that to you to decide; here's the relevant clip:

Atari exec explains why it's just not worth going there

Also in the article we asserted that Arzt compared Atari's last-minute cancelled launch of the console months earlier to the launch of a rocket by NASA. (Which is, of course, absurd.) Just another example of fake news? Perhaps not.

Launching a games console is apparently equivalent to launching a rocket into outer space

We were also vocal about the fact that Atari's answers – in particular the fact that it still hadn't decided what chip it was going to use in its hardware – gave us seriously reason for pause. We can't imagine where we got that idea:

Perfectly normal to not decide on your basic hardware components prior to a launch

Atari's response on Facebook isn't a total surprise. We sensed a little, just a little, frustration the executive's voice.

Do you get the sense that Atari isn't keen on searching questions?

Hey, at least Atari answered all our questions openly and expansively. Um...

No, not frustrating at all

The truth is that even despite all that, Atari and Arzt obviously, so clearly, had no reason to believe, following our conversation, that we were likely to write a negative article in response to the answers we were given.

Imagine being blindsided by a negative article

And on top of that, Atari was extremely clear about the reason it had invited us – during the very busy Games Developer Conference – to meet up with it. There was never any indication that the actual games console would be there and would actually work. Yes, we're being sarcastic.

And it was therefore extremely misleading of us to suggest after the fact and in the article that we ever expected to be able to use the console at a showcase event. We never gave any indication that we were surprised by the fact that we were basically shown several pieces of plastic. We certainly never mentioned that we expected to play a game. Nope, that never happened.

Unrealistic expectations? Why would you be able to play a game at a game console launch?

But most of all, we would like to apologize, sincerely, to all our readers and to anyone considering putting down money for the Atari VCS for completely omitting a critical part of the interview in our original article.

We made no mention of the fact that there is every reason to believe that Atari's entire enterprise is being funded by hype and that the only way the company can afford to create even its first console is by persuading people to hand over their cash before the company itself has a working prototype.

Does Atari even have the funds to make one of these consoles?

So if you do fancy gambling several hundred dollars or quid on some retro gear, we can only encourage you to preorder an Atari VCS right now – there is only a week left on its capital-raising Indiegogo offering.

Don't worry, you won't be alone: there are more than 11,000 other punters out there. ®

Here's the full 30-minute interview.

The full interview

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022