This article is more than 1 year old
European Parliament balks at copyright law reform vote
Pirates: We saved the internet!
The European Parliament has kicked back a vote on proposed copyright law changes until September to allow tempers to cool and the agreed text to be re-examined.
The decision was forced because 31 MEPs abstained, 318 voted against the European Commission's proposals, and 278 were in favour. Parliamentary rules require a plenary to be held if more than 10 per cent of MEPs (76) indicate they will abstain.
Supporters of the amendments – which included Paul McCartney and the BPI – claimed the process had been impacted by intimidation and lobbying from outside the EU, including from the US and Russia, though both sides had their heavyweight supporters. The detractors included the Mozilla Foundation, Google and Wikipedia, which arguably wouldn't have been affected by any of the changes. The Legal Affairs Committee's (JURI) point man, Axel Voss, told the FT he'd received 60,000 bot-generated emails. Others pointed to tweets from dormant or suspicious accounts.
There's no disguising the setback for the Eurocrats working on the text.
Great success: Your protests have worked! The European Parliament has sent the copyright law back to the drawing board. All MEPs will get to vote on #uploadfilters and the #linktax September 10–13. Now let's keep up the pressure to make sure we #SaveYourInternet! pic.twitter.com/VwqAgH0Xs5— Julia Reda (@Senficon) July 5, 2018
After Wikipedia joined the campaign, Europe's sole Pirate Party MEP hailed the decision as a victory. The Electronic Frontier Foundation also sounded happy: "We're close to stopping these terrible proposals – and we're gaining momentum," it tweeted from San Francisco, California.
Euro privacy watchdog raises eyebrows at mulled EU copyright lawREAD MORE
The decision allows the text – which was agreed after months of wrangling by member states, and approved by JURI – to be revised. The wording had been drafted and redrafted for months, giving exemptions to SMEs, Wikipedia and source code repositories.
Rights-holders expressed dismay at the prospect of further changes.
Music rights campaigner David Lowery claimed Google had won by deploying "hybrid warfare". To demonstrate how open the campaign tools are to abuse, Lowery had signed the petition hundreds of times from the USA. No verification or geographical corroboration was required.
"They used their dominant search engine and social media to spread outright lies & [disinformation]. Robo calls, spam emails, fake twitter accounts, fake AstroTurf groups, paid off academics. Hybrid/Information war techniques [to win]," he wrote.
Some supporters of the changes put a brave face on over the decision.
"MEPs voted to obstruct a crucial EU Copyright Reform from progressing to the final legislative stage, succumbing to an intense lobby of manipulative anti-copyright campaigners, US internet giants and vested interests who benefit from stealing and monetising publishers' valuable content," the European Publishers Council said in a statement.
Indie music companies – who got the sharp end of the stick in YouTube negotiations and filed a formal competition complaint about YouTube, kicking off the entire Value Gap debate four years ago – were more hopeful.
"The result underlines that although many parliamentarians were satisfied, others were simply not ready to decide. It is like a second reading. This will take place in September," Impala's Helen Smith said in a statement.
DDoS on Brussels?
Campaign tools used to oppose Article 13 did not require a valid email address or isolate non-EU users. As a result Americans and even Russian bots (we found at least one) hammered MEPs' inboxes in the run up to the vote.
"After having analyzed the platform from which all emails come, I realized that it does not require a valid email address from the 'users' to send emails. Thus, as sometimes we receive dozens of emails per minute, we can conceive that it is actually robots that send all these emails, which luckily makes this movement lose credibility," said MEP Jean-Marie Cavada.
"We received tens of thousands of emails on the copyright directive, almost 40,000 to be exact. This influx of email has even blocked the computer of one of my colleagues. It becomes spamming... We cannot imagine that these emails are grassroots."
The tech giants have created fake copyright /creators organisations They are sending 1,000s of automated emails to MEPs trying to make it look like a grassroots movement. #vote4jurireport @authorsocieties @IMROireland— Eleanor McEvoy (@eleanormcevoy) July 4, 2018
As well as showing how the anti-Article 13 tools were open to abuse, Lowery claimed to have found strange patterns of behaviour, with thousands of Spaniards all waking up at the same time (05:30) to tweet about Article 13.
"The future of democracy in the EU is at stake. These techniques could easily (and probably have been) replicated by state actors interested in undermining EU on other issues," Lowery wrote.®