Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Pentagon 'do not buy' list says нет to Russia, 不要 to Chinese code

Protect and survive, or old-fashioned protectionism – we'll let you decide

The US military is drawing up a list of overseas organizations – primarily in Russia and China, funnily enough – that the Pentagon and its contractors shouldn't buy software from, citing security concerns.

In a briefing with journalists on Friday, Ellen Lord, US defense undersecretary for acquisition and sustainment, said officials have spent the past six months crafting the so-called "do not buy" list. The aim is to stop code with Russian and Chinese origins or connections from being purchased and/or used by America's armed forces and its contractors in case the stuff can be remotely hijacked and spied on.

The list is being compiled with the help of US defense contractor organizations including the Aerospace Industries Association, the National Defense Industrial Association, and the Professional Services Council.

"We had specific issues … that caused us to focus on this," said Lord. "What we are doing is making sure that we do not buy software that's Russian or Chinese provenance. Quite often that's difficult to tell at first glance because of holding companies."

The US government has been locking down its supply chain to thwart attempts by foreign intelligence to insert vulnerabilities or backdoors into imported technology installed in American computers networks – y'know, the sort of backdoors the NSA hid in some of Cisco's devices. The most high-profile crackdowns to date have been against Russian security software vendor Kaspersky and Chinese hardware supplier Huawei, with officials citing security concerns.

US

Uncle Sam's treatment of Huawei is world-class hypocrisy – consumers will pay the price

READ MORE

Given Lord's background, some are going to question if this latest list is really a security issue or just protectionism in the defense industry. Lord was appointed last year after a 30-year career in the US defense contracting industry, latterly at Textron, which owns Bell Helicopters. On the other hand, no one sane would not put it past Chinese and Russian intelligence to leverage tools and products exported to the US to snoop on Uncle Sam. Spies gotta spy.

While America turns its back on Chinese and Russian software, Cisco, IBM, HP, McAfee, and SAP have reportedly handed over the source code and blueprints for their kit to Kremlin investigators to pore over in search for backdoors and other malware before allowing the gear to be sold and used in the former Soviet Union.

This move sparked some serious concerns, not least because some of these companies are major suppliers to America's military. Exposing the source code to Moscow's agents would show Russian spies where to attack installed equipment and software to eavesdrop on the US administration.

China has made similar demands for source code access. So far, Microsoft, IBM, and Intel have said they are not playing ball, but that may change.

To complicate matters further, folks in Russia and China have been trying to buy stakes in key American software companies, as well as setting up holding and shell companies to obfuscate the origin of code. Sorting out what is and isn’t acceptable to the Pentagon may take some time. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like