Denial of denial-of-service served: There was NO DDoS on FCC net neutrality comments

Probe confirms: No attack, just an incredibly unpopular policy brought down feedback site

An internal investigation has laid waste to the FCC's claims that its net neutrality comments system was knocked offline by a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack.

The broadband watchdog's own inspector general will any day now release its findings into the outage, and confirm what many people had suspected all along: the May 2017 downtime affecting the US regulator's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) was the result of actual netizens flooding the comment page with pro-net-neutrality comments – and not, as the FCC alleged, an automated attempt to crash the site.

The ECFS had gone down on the evening of Sunday, May 7, after TV funnyman John Oliver went on air to slam the FCC for its then-looming repeal of net neutrality protections in the US, and to urge Americans to write in to the FCC and make their feelings on the matter known. The response was so strong that the flood of comments temporarily knocked the ECFS offline.

At the time, rather than admit their policy choice was generating a massive and mostly negative response from millions of people, the FCC had its then-CIO Dr David Bray claim the outage was due to a DDoS – a tsunami of junk internet traffic – that overwhelmed the regulator's servers to disrupt the comment process.

The claim eventually drew the attention of Congress, and an investigation was soon launched by the FCC's inspector general to get to the bottom of things. As most had expected, the probe found that there was no DDoS attack after all.

FCC douses America's net neutrality in gas, tosses over a lit match


"The Inspector General Report tells us what we knew all along: the FCC’s claim that it was the victim of a DDoS attack during the net neutrality proceeding is bogus," said [PDF] FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, commenting on the report ahead of its formal publication, on Monday.

"What happened instead is obvious—millions of Americans overwhelmed our online system because they wanted to tell us how important internet openness is to them and how distressed they were to see the FCC roll back their rights. It’s unfortunate that this agency’s energy and resources needed to be spent debunking this implausible claim."

Don't expect a mea culpa from FCC chairman and anti-net neutrality champion Ajit Pai, however. The FCC head issued a statement not only throwing Bray under the bus, but throwing it into reverse and gunning the engine again for good measure.

"With respect to the report’s findings, I am deeply disappointed that the FCC’s former chief information officer (CIO), who was hired by the prior administration and is no longer with the Commission, provided inaccurate information about this incident to me, my office, Congress, and the American people," Pai said [PDF] in washing his hands of the matter.

"This is completely unacceptable. I’m also disappointed that some working under the former CIO apparently either disagreed with the information that he was presenting or had questions about it, yet didn’t feel comfortable communicating their concerns to me or my office." ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022