Wondering what to do with that $2,300 burning a hole in your pocket?

Why not waste it on some not-very-good Magic Leap techno-goggles?

The day has finally arrived! After years of delays and endless over-hyping, Magic Leap has launched its augmented-reality goggles.

And it costs a cool $2,295. Plus $60 for a hub to connect it to a PC. Plus $30 for a shoulder strap. Plus $40 for foam inserts. Plus $500 a year if you want its "priority service plan." Which basically puts it on a par with Microsoft's AR Hololens headset.

But is it any good?

No, it's not.

In the lead-up to today's launch, Magic Leap gave select people yet-another tightly controlled demo of the gear, and they have been unanimously underwhelmed. Which is quite something given the extraordinary willingness of tech journalists to effusively wax lyrical about any new technology just because it's new.

"My initial experience didn't blow me away, despite Magic Leap's promises," admits CNet. "It's not the kind of revolutionary (or downright magical) advance that Magic Leap has teased for years," warns The Verge.

The Wall Street Journal's reviewer tried her absolute best to like it, but was obliged to confess that she "found Magic Leap’s technically impressive demos to be little more than a novelty." MIT Technology Review concurs: "While the experiences in the demo room are fun and visually impressive, none of it is truly mind-blowing." Both agree the product is "nowhere near ready for the masses."

The Verge wonders why there isn’t more: "I’m not sure what its internal studios and partners have been doing with several years with virtually unlimited funding."

Prep time

If you consider that the upstart has had hundreds of millions of dollars, and years to prepare for this unveiling, and that journalists were flown to a special room in Magic Leap's headquarters in Florida – which the biz will have mapped in intricate detail in advance for its gizmo – this is all a resounding thumbs down.

MIT Tech Review even managed to crash the device: "Magic Leap's Create app lets users drag and drop digital 3D characters in the real world. At that point, an error message pops up in my field of view. Apparently the headset can’t support any more creations, and I have to delete mine before making more."

Magic Leap blows our mind with its incredible technology... that still doesn't f**king exist


Critically though – as we have repeatedly noted – the hardware cannot handle the most critical component of its entire experience: people moving around.

"While the visuals tend to look sharp and stay still, when I swiftly shake my head, they sometimes split into red, green, and blue bits as I move around," warns MIT Tech Review.

"Some objects appeared cut off unless I turned my head or took a few steps back," notes the WSJ. The Verge spotted the same: "Tracking was generally good, but objects occasionally shifted or jittered. A few times, animated objects seized up altogether, which might have been an issue with tracking, Lightpack performance, or something else."

Inside-out, upside-down

It's actually "something else," and it's called "inside-out tracking" by the hardware maker. Magic Leap is unable to reliably cope with movement of the headset, particularly when it comes to correlating the orientation of the gadget with the movement of virtual objects in view.

While its entire premise is that you can wear the wireless headset anywhere, and its system will recognize your environment in real-time using only sensors on the device – rather than external motion detectors – it is an extremely difficult thing to achieve.

The system tries to provide a smooth experience as you move around, but there is a lag in the actual movement detected by the headset sensors and the rendering of images you see while wearing the headset. Sooner or later, if you move too much in one direction, the hardware has to catch up – and you experience that as a jump in position of objects in the room.

With Magic Leap's headset, you see through the glass in the device, with graphics laid over your view, and so any discrepancies are all the more obvious and disorientating. Inside-out tracking also gets harder the further away something is – which is why in all the demos that the reviewers talk about, all the objects are close to them and the further away they are, the bigger they are.

But don't worry, promises Magic Leap: it will all come good soon.

On the image jumpiness, one reviewer reported that Magic Leap CEO Rony Abovitz – who was in the room with them – "says this will be improved in Magic Leap Two." When The Verge noted the same thing: "Sam Miller, one of the founders and leader of the systems engineering team, tells me this is an issue of 'tuning' the different pieces of hardware and software that work together."

Well, yes it is, if you want to give the word "tuning" the largest possible interpretation you can imagine.

What all the reviewers really want to say, but don't feel they can, is that Magic Leap's massively over-hyped, long-delayed, hugely expensive headset just isn't any good.

Faint praise

But instead we'll have to settle for "slightly better than Hololens" – Microsoft's nerd spectacles that came out more than two years ago. Essentially, once Magic Leap's glasses are improved, and made smaller and cheaper, and have a larger field of view, and work outside a single specially mapped room, well, then they might be good.

"Magic Leap feels… like… a stepping-stone more than a revolution," says CNet. "We shouldn't count the crazy Florida startup out," is the WSJ's faint praise.

Let's go live now to Magic Leap and... Ah, still making millions from made-up tech


The truth is that Magic Leap continues to be unable to pull off the actual magic leap it needs – actual inside-out tracking with a field of view that gives you a sense of being in a room rather than looking down a pair of binoculars. Anything else is simply not going to cut it.

And pretty much the only thing going for the upstart right now is that Abovitz's passion and visions of just-out-of-reach computing magic has persuaded a huge number of talented engineers and content makers to work for the company. But if the money runs out, so will those people – right into the arms of other tech and gaming outfits.

Having being forced for perhaps the first time to confront the honest views of someone not on his payroll, CEO Abovitz appears to have had somewhat of a reality check. He admits to MIT Tech Review that "expectations for what he’s building have spiraled out of control."

He tells The Verge he wants to "reset some of the hype" – hype, which, incidentally, he has been entirely responsible for and, in fact, appears to have manufactured in order to bring in new investors. "It's all extremes, and I just feel like, 'Hey, let's all come back to the center, let's take a breath," he tells the reviewer.


But don't worry, before long, the showman is back at it. He literally shows a reviewer a table with a cloth over something, and tells them that underneath are the second and third iterations of the headset – which he is only showing to investors.

And he has a new line to explain why the Magic Leap One is such a damp squib: it's his Apple I: the proof-of-concept device built by Steve Wozniak that in turn led to the Apple II, Steve Jobs, and tech history.

You have to hand it to him, Abovitz knows how to press the right tech hype buttons. Just a shame his billion-dollar headset is shit. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022