Gartner: Governments want to be digital, but just can't scale it up

Quelle surprise, they also know digital skills are important but don't run training programmes...


Government digital initiatives are limping behind other industries – and the public sector is more likely to outsource for help, according to analyst firm Gartner.

Although government bods in the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, India and Singapore polled by the firm claimed that digital was high on their agendas, their ability to scale up these plans moves slowly.

Undeterred by the wrath of those that hate the term, Gartner asked respondents whether their digital ambitions lay in "digital transformation" or in using technology to optimise services.

About half plumped for a combination of the two, while a third said they were focusing only on optimisation, and 17 per cent on just transformation.

Planning prevents poor performance

Gartner drew up a five-point plan for government initiatives, ranging from wanting to be better at digital to reaping the rewards.

In analyst speak these stages are desire, designing, delivering, scaling and harvesting – and 91 per cent of the 60 officials that responded to the straw poll were still in the first three stages.

These focus on developing and introducing new services, rather than scaling up those services and seeing them supersede their non-digital counterparts.

Effectively, this means governments are better at discussing problems and thinking up plans than they are seeing them through, or ensuring they work better than the paper-based systems they replaced.

This will be of little surprise to UK government IT watchers who saw the Government Digital Service – introduced with much fanfare in 2011 – pale into insignificance in less than a decade, at just about the time when its flagship programmes should have been making Whitehall savings.

Dean Laheca, research director at Gartner, said the results indicated “a lack of effectiveness by government organisations at scaling their digital business”.

He pointed the finger at two internal barriers. The first, a misalignment between digital strategy and business priorities, pointing out that plans for tech can’t exist without buy-in from the wider business.

The second was that the organisation wasn’t ready for change, with Laheca saying that “if there is no urgency to act, or if the culture is not ready to accept change, progress will remain slow”.

Hire in professionals

Gartner also found that there was a greater reliance on third-party developers in governments than other sectors, with more than half saying they used them.

This is in contrast to 41 per cent over all the six industries surveyed, which comprised financial services, government, manufacturing, retail, healthcare and education.

Laheca said governments’ use of third parties was a positive, describing it as a “big step in the right direction” and calling for more new partnerships to be developed.

Indeed, he put government support of services built by third-party devs down to “open data, open APIs and support for civic technology”.

He did not relate it to factors Reg readers might be more familiar with, such as an ingrained obsession with outsourcers, years of lock-in to legacy systems that newbies can’t support or a lack of digitally-skilled civil servants.

This is despite the latter point being indicated elsewhere in the report; it found that, although half the respondents said that improving staff skills were critical to the success of their business, 58 per cent had no formal training programme.

Laheca advised C-suite execs in government to work with HR departments to “assess the current state of digital dexterity and develop an organisation-wide programme”

The analyst also advised governments to take develop schemes involving citizens to boost public sector digital initiatives, saying that establishing “citizen ecosystems” would up engagement and benefit society more generally. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022