US govt concedes that you can indeed f**k Nazis online: Domain-name swear ban lifted

Famous seven dirty little words allowed in .us addresses

NSFW The US government has conceded that you can indeed fuck Nazis on the internet.

You can also shit and piss on the cocksucking motherfucking cu... [we get the picture, Kieren – ed.]... tits [that's enough – ed.]

Yes, the "seven dirty words" made famous by the comedian George Carlin in 1972 were until just a few weeks ago also banned on the internet.

Well, the part of it actively managed by Uncle Sam, anyway: its .us registry.

The US government's Department of Commerce owns .us and contracts out its administration to Neustar. As part of that process, the seven banned words were written into the first contract signed in 2001, and been there since, meaning you couldn't register a .us domain name containing those naughty strings.

Until, that is, a guy named Jeremy Rubin grew incensed at the white nationalist rally in Charlottesville in 2017 – in which people marched through the streets literally chanting Nazi slogans, and three folks were killed – and decided to register his outrage online. He bought the domain name, and set about building a website.

But soon after registering the name, he received an email putting the name on hold. Neustar said it broke its rules, ie: its contract with the US government. Needless to say, Rubin felt this was a first amendment violation, and pushed back, ultimately getting the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Harvard Law School involved.

Somewhat unusually for the United States, the issue was resolved following a back-and-forth of views between the parties rather than a lawsuit. And then, in an absolutely incomprehensible contract amendment in July, the Department of Commerce rescinded the rule.

The implication of that change wasn't understood by anyone until last month, and this week Rubin got his name back – meaning that you can indeed now fuck with Nazis in the United States.

Using .us, we mean. You can swear using other top-level domains.

A short history of fucking

What most people don't know about Carlin's famous 1972 monologue is that the seven words he reeled off were not a formal list but one he had put together from his own observations of words that had been bleeped out on TV and radio over the years.

The origins of the list came when fellow funnyman Lenny Bruce was arrested, charged, and tried under obscenity laws after swearing on stage during his act. He later gave a list of nine words he had identified as being the ones that had seemingly broken the law. Those nine also featured in Carlin's subsequent list of seven – Bruce's bonus pair were "ass" and "balls."

The irony is that by naming them, Carlin's seven dirty words became a semi-official list a year later when his recorded show was broadcast on the radio. A man complained to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) saying they were inappropriate for the time of day (roughly 2pm). John Douglas claimed to have heard the show while driving in his car with his 15-year-old son.

The FCC issued the radio station – WBAI, owned by Pacifica – an official warning and Pacifica appealed. The courts sided with Pacifica, and so the FCC appealed all the way to the US Supreme Court. The supremes then decided 5-4 that the FCC had not broken either the first or fifth amendments of the Constitution in its decision.

But there were lots of caveats, and the judgment was purposefully narrow, which led to a whole range of subsequent cases that effectively established a 10pm to 6am watershed. Even so, there was still no official list of words, and an effort to provide one in a 2003 Clean Airwaves Act never got anywhere.

The upshot of all of this is basically that if you are broadcasting over public airwaves, the FCC can decide to impose sanctions against you if you use obscene words – but not if they are "fleeting." Sometimes the federal regulator imposes fines; sometimes it doesn't.

But the FCC can only do so for radio and TV shows over public airwaves – so cable TV and the internet are exempt. A position that has, in a roundabout way, just been confirmed by the US government in its decision to remove the "seven dirty words" restriction on .us domain names.

Which means that, if you wish, you can do much more than fuck over Nazis with a .US internet address. Of course, as anyone who has been on the internet will recognize, this sudden lifting of restrictions doesn't mean, well, shit. ®


If you're interested in how the US government can turn something as lively as lifting a ban on swear words into something so unfathomable dull and incomprehensible that no one noticed it until months later, you can check out the contract amendment [PDF].

The relevant part? "This modification deletes, in its entirety, the Administrative Policy Statement found on page 1.4-34 under section Domain Name Review ( of Neustar's technical proposal, which has been incorporated by reference into this contract. This modification is accomplished on a bilateral basis pursuant to mutual agreement of the parties as allowed by FAR 43.103(a)(3)."

Other stories you might like

  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading
  • Conti: Russian-backed rulers of Costa Rican hacktocracy?
    Also, Chinese IT admin jailed for deleting database, and the NSA promises no more backdoors

    In brief The notorious Russian-aligned Conti ransomware gang has upped the ante in its attack against Costa Rica, threatening to overthrow the government if it doesn't pay a $20 million ransom. 

    Costa Rican president Rodrigo Chaves said that the country is effectively at war with the gang, who in April infiltrated the government's computer systems, gaining a foothold in 27 agencies at various government levels. The US State Department has offered a $15 million reward leading to the capture of Conti's leaders, who it said have made more than $150 million from 1,000+ victims.

    Conti claimed this week that it has insiders in the Costa Rican government, the AP reported, warning that "We are determined to overthrow the government by means of a cyber attack, we have already shown you all the strength and power, you have introduced an emergency." 

    Continue reading
  • China-linked Twisted Panda caught spying on Russian defense R&D
    Because Beijing isn't above covert ops to accomplish its five-year goals

    Chinese cyberspies targeted two Russian defense institutes and possibly another research facility in Belarus, according to Check Point Research.

    The new campaign, dubbed Twisted Panda, is part of a larger, state-sponsored espionage operation that has been ongoing for several months, if not nearly a year, according to the security shop.

    In a technical analysis, the researchers detail the various malicious stages and payloads of the campaign that used sanctions-related phishing emails to attack Russian entities, which are part of the state-owned defense conglomerate Rostec Corporation.

    Continue reading
  • FTC signals crackdown on ed-tech harvesting kid's data
    Trade watchdog, and President, reminds that COPPA can ban ya

    The US Federal Trade Commission on Thursday said it intends to take action against educational technology companies that unlawfully collect data from children using online educational services.

    In a policy statement, the agency said, "Children should not have to needlessly hand over their data and forfeit their privacy in order to do their schoolwork or participate in remote learning, especially given the wide and increasing adoption of ed tech tools."

    The agency says it will scrutinize educational service providers to ensure that they are meeting their legal obligations under COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

    Continue reading
  • Mysterious firm seeks to buy majority stake in Arm China
    Chinese joint venture's ousted CEO tries to hang on - who will get control?

    The saga surrounding Arm's joint venture in China just took another intriguing turn: a mysterious firm named Lotcap Group claims it has signed a letter of intent to buy a 51 percent stake in Arm China from existing investors in the country.

    In a Chinese-language press release posted Wednesday, Lotcap said it has formed a subsidiary, Lotcap Fund, to buy a majority stake in the joint venture. However, reporting by one newspaper suggested that the investment firm still needs the approval of one significant investor to gain 51 percent control of Arm China.

    The development comes a couple of weeks after Arm China said that its former CEO, Allen Wu, was refusing once again to step down from his position, despite the company's board voting in late April to replace Wu with two co-chief executives. SoftBank Group, which owns 49 percent of the Chinese venture, has been trying to unentangle Arm China from Wu as the Japanese tech investment giant plans for an initial public offering of the British parent company.

    Continue reading
  • SmartNICs power the cloud, are enterprise datacenters next?
    High pricing, lack of software make smartNICs a tough sell, despite offload potential

    SmartNICs have the potential to accelerate enterprise workloads, but don't expect to see them bring hyperscale-class efficiency to most datacenters anytime soon, ZK Research's Zeus Kerravala told The Register.

    SmartNICs are widely deployed in cloud and hyperscale datacenters as a means to offload input/output (I/O) intensive network, security, and storage operations from the CPU, freeing it up to run revenue generating tenant workloads. Some more advanced chips even offload the hypervisor to further separate the infrastructure management layer from the rest of the server.

    Despite relative success in the cloud and a flurry of innovation from the still-limited vendor SmartNIC ecosystem, including Mellanox (Nvidia), Intel, Marvell, and Xilinx (AMD), Kerravala argues that the use cases for enterprise datacenters are unlikely to resemble those of the major hyperscalers, at least in the near term.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022