Ethernet patent inventor given permission to question validity of his own patent

Well, if anyone knows if he fudged it, it would be him


The inventor of two patents that covers Ethernet switching products has been given permission to question the validity of his own invention.

That's the unusual upshot of a decision by a US federal appeals court this week, which ruled anyone – including the original inventor – is entitled to challenge the validity of a patent.

The question then is: why would David Cheriton, who lives in Silicon Valley, want to undermine his own invention?

And the answer to that lies in who else is named on patent 7,340,597 - "Method and apparatus for securing a communications device using a logging module" – and patent 6,377,577 – "Access control list processing in hardware." In both cases, the patent is assigned to Cisco.

Cheriton worked for Cisco at the time he come up with the inventions and he assigned his entire rights to its over to the company. Cisco said Cheriton was "compensated for his employment and… provided additional compensation for the assignment of inventions he developed during his tenure at Cisco."

But shortly after assigning his patent, Cheriton and at least a dozen other Cisco employees quit and founded Arista, where Cheriton served as chief scientist for several years. He resigned in March 2014 and in April 2015 Arista filed for a review of his patents.

Go get yourself

Under longstanding law, the inventor of a patent is not allowed to question it under the doctrine of assignor estoppel. But the court ruled [PDF] that recent laws and precedential decisions have stopped making that absolute. Instead, it decided that anyone who is not the "owner" of a patent is allowed to file for an inter partes review of that patent.

Handshake

Groupon to pay IBM $57m after getting money off e-commerce patent settlement

READ MORE

Since Cheriton is not the owner, he can challenge his own patent.

And he - well, his old company - may be successful. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) upheld several parts of the '597 patent but also found that several were invalid due to their "obviousness." Now that it has decided that Arista can challenge the patent, the federal appeals court sent the case back down to the PTAB to review its validity.

Cheriton seemingly did a better job with his other patent: the federal court backed up [PDF] the PTAB's decision that all but one of Arista's claims against it were invalid.

So well done David Cheriton for successfully overturning an old law in order to have a crack at undermining your own patents, which you might not manage to do because you did a pretty good job of them in the first place. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • AI tool finds hundreds of genes related to human motor neuron disease

    Breakthrough could lead to development of drugs to target illness

    A machine-learning algorithm has helped scientists find 690 human genes associated with a higher risk of developing motor neuron disease, according to research published in Cell this week.

    Neuronal cells in the central nervous system and brain break down and die in people with motor neuron disease, like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) more commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, named after the baseball player who developed it. They lose control over their bodies, and as the disease progresses patients become completely paralyzed. There is currently no verified cure for ALS.

    Motor neuron disease typically affects people in old age and its causes are unknown. Johnathan Cooper-Knock, a clinical lecturer at the University of Sheffield in England and leader of Project MinE, an ambitious effort to perform whole genome sequencing of ALS, believes that understanding how genes affect cellular function could help scientists develop new drugs to treat the disease.

    Continue reading
  • Need to prioritize security bug patches? Don't forget to scan Twitter as well as use CVSS scores

    Exploit, vulnerability discussion online can offer useful signals

    Organizations looking to minimize exposure to exploitable software should scan Twitter for mentions of security bugs as well as use the Common Vulnerability Scoring System or CVSS, Kenna Security argues.

    Better still is prioritizing the repair of vulnerabilities for which exploit code is available, if that information is known.

    CVSS is a framework for rating the severity of software vulnerabilities (identified using CVE, or Common Vulnerability Enumeration, numbers), on a scale from 1 (least severe) to 10 (most severe). It's overseen by First.org, a US-based, non-profit computer security organization.

    Continue reading
  • Sniff those Ukrainian emails a little more carefully, advises Uncle Sam in wake of Belarusian digital vandalism

    NotPetya started over there, don't forget

    US companies should be on the lookout for security nasties from Ukrainian partners following the digital graffiti and malware attack launched against Ukraine by Belarus, the CISA has warned.

    In a statement issued on Tuesday, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said it "strongly urges leaders and network defenders to be on alert for malicious cyber activity," having issued a checklist [PDF] of recommended actions to take.

    "If working with Ukrainian organizations, take extra care to monitor, inspect, and isolate traffic from those organizations; closely review access controls for that traffic," added CISA, which also advised reviewing backups and disaster recovery drills.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022