Britain may not be able to fend off a determined cyber-attack, MPs warn

And those utility price controls? Er, not helpful


Britain's critical national infrastructure is vulnerable to hackers and neither UK.gov nor privatised operators are doing enough to tighten things up, a Parliamentary committee has warned.

The Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy has laid into the government for its slapdash approach to IT security, claiming that officials are "not acting with the urgency and forcefulness that the situation demands".

"It appears the government is not delivering on it with a meaningful sense of purpose or urgency. Its efforts so far certainly fail to do justice to its own assessment that major cyber attacks on the UK and interests are a top-tier threat to national security," said their report (PDF, 709kB/64 pages).

The committee includes one-time tech entrepreneur Baroness (Martha) Lane-Fox of Soho, Dr Julian Lewis MP, who is also chairman of the House of Commons' Defence Committee, and former Labour foreign secretary Margaret Beckett. Constitutional nerds will know that Britain's intelligence agencies MI5 and MI6 report to the home and foreign secretaries, respectively, while cyber-defence policy intersects with the Ministry of Defence's cybersecurity activities.

The UK's critical national infrastructure (CNI), which the report said "is a natural target for a major cyber attack", faces a dual threat of more aggressive overseas hackers and a lack of funding for cyber defences.

"Hostile states are becoming more aggressive in their behaviour, with some states – especially Russia – starting to explore ways of disrupting CNI, in addition to conducting espionage and theft of intellectual property."

CNI was defined as comprising 13 market sectors: chemicals; civil nuclear communications; defence; emergency services; energy; finance; food; government; health; space; transport and water.

Unusually for a Parliamentary committee, the report also squarely blamed a flagship government policy, price controls on energy utilities, for strangling investment in cyber defences – previous state threats to fine those firms for crap cybersecurity having seemingly met significant push-back behind the scenes.

"Many CNI operators are utility providers whose funding streams are pre-agreed, often by regulators, and limited by price controls. Without a more flexible approach to price controls, the question often asked in relation to cyber security – 'how much is enough?' – can become particularly acute for these CNI operators," wrote the report's authors, citing evidence given to the committee by Ofgem's Johnathan Brearley and Water UK's Paul Smith, who told the committee "that investment in cyber security by operators in the energy and water sectors is limited by price controls".

Though the National Cyber Security Centre arm of GCHQ was set up a couple of years ago to help counter this kind of threat, the report also warned that "there appears to be little beyond anecdotal evidence that the UK is at the forefront of international efforts on cybersecurity", suggesting that, despite its publicity, GCHQ may in fact not be able to cope with the scale of the threat if things got truly nasty. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021