Seagate woos NASty folk and other flashy types at CES

Slow, small and quick, or big and speedy? SSDs for mini-NAS, thin laptops and gamers

Seagate has tossed three SSDs into the CES arena, looking to please small NAS users, thin laptoppers and gamers.

LSI WarpDrive section

Seagate in surprise $450m LSI Flash gobble


We have the IronWolf 100 NAS-focused SSD, the BarraCuda 510 thin laptop drive and the FireCuda 510 gaming device.

The IronWolf 110 is a 2.5-inch drive with a slow 6Gbit/s SATA interface and five capacity levels: 240, 4780 and 960GB, and 1.92 and 3.84TB. It uses 3D TLC (3 bits/cell) flash and has a SandForce-derived controller with in-built compression (branded as DuraWrite). Seagate acquired this technology as part of its slurp of LSI from Avago in 2014.

There is an existing line of IronWolf NAS hard drives and the IronWolf 110 can be a cache for these in suitably enabled arrays, such as the QNAP TVS-951X or used in an all-flash NAS system. It has NAS-optimised firmware and a NAS Health Management facility is coming.

The performance looks good against disk drives but poor compared to NVMe-interface SSDs, with only up 90,000/55,000 random read/write IOPS and 560/535 MB/sec sequential read/write bandwidth. This is not much different from Seagate's Nytro 1351 and 1551 SSDs or its BarraCuda SSD (the BarraCuda 510 goes faster, though, as you'll see below).

The average latency is 175/40μs read/write at the 3.84TB capacity level.

The drives deliver up to 7,000TB-written (3.84TB model) or 1 drive write/day with a five-year warranty. Seagate said this SSD is targeted at prosumers, creative pros, small and medium businesses, as well as SME NAS users. It will be available later this month but there is no pricing information.

M.2 2280 format drives

The next two drives are basically one product branded two ways. It's a M.2 2280 SSD with from 256GB to 2TB in capacity, using Toshiba 64-layer 3D TLC NAND and an NVMe interface via a Phison E12 NVMe controller. The BarraCuda 510 is a single-sided version with 256GB and 512GB capacity levels aimed at thin laptop users and has encryption facilities.

The FireCuda 510 is a double-sided variant with 1TB and 2TB capacity levels intended for gamers. There are no encryption facilities.


The BarraCuda 510 is – oddly – skewed for random write operations with random read/write IOPS of up to 340,000/500,000. Usually the random read IOPS number is higher than the write IOPS figure. No reason is given for the write optimisation.

It returns to read dominance with the sequential read/write bandwidth numbers: up to 3.4/2.1 GB/sec. Preliminary endurance numbers give it a 320 terabytes written (TBW) rating at the 512GB level and 160 TBW for the 256GB model. There is a five-year warranty and a 1.8 million hours mean time between failures (MTBF) rating.

The FireCuda 510 has much higher performance – up to 620,000/600,000 random read/write IOPS and 3.45/3.2 GB/sec sequential read/write bandwidth.

The endurance numbers are 2,600TBW for the 2TB product and 1,300TBW for the 1TB version – and the same 1.8 million hours MTBF and five-year warranty as for the BarraCuda 510.

Both the BarraCuda 510 and FireCuda 510 have a two-year data recovery service option. They will be be shipping in March and no prices were announced.

Get an IronWolf 110 datasheet here (pdf), a BarraCuda 510 datasheet here (PDF), and a FireCuda 110 datasheet here (PDF). ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading
  • In record year for vulnerabilities, Microsoft actually had fewer
    Occasional gaping hole and overprivileged users still blight the Beast of Redmond

    Despite a record number of publicly disclosed security flaws in 2021, Microsoft managed to improve its stats, according to research from BeyondTrust.

    Figures from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) show last year broke all records for security vulnerabilities. By December, according to pentester Redscan, 18,439 were recorded. That's an average of more than 50 flaws a day.

    However just 1,212 vulnerabilities were reported in Microsoft products last year, said BeyondTrust, a 5 percent drop on the previous year. In addition, critical vulnerabilities in the software (those with a CVSS score of 9 or more) plunged 47 percent, with the drop in Windows Server specifically down 50 percent. There was bad news for Internet Explorer and Edge vulnerabilities, though: they were up 280 percent on the prior year, with 349 flaws spotted in 2021.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022