Peak Apple: This time it's SERIOUS, Tim

What Captain Cook can do next for Cupertino


Comment Like a comedy sketch Lord Nelson, Apple CEO Tim Cook held the telescope to his eyepatch this week and told investors he couldn't see any enemy ships.

Everything's just fine, he told CNBC's Jim Cramer. "I think Apple is not well understood in some of Wall Street." Or perhaps it's very well understood. Here are a few things Cook might like to ponder.

The crisis that we in the media like to call "Peak Apple" has come and gone many times before – most recently in 2013/14. In response to flat sales, Apple abandoned its dogmatic design philosophy of making one tiny iPhone and bounded free. This change created a "supercycle" of upgrades. This time might be different, for a number of reasons. The supercycle has never returned.

Firstly, Apple is less diversified, and more heavily exposed to a market that some would argue is now "in recession".

(To his credit, this is something Cramer brought up.)

Static

Do not adjust your set: Hats off to Apple, you struggle to shift iPhones 'cos you're oddly ethical

READ MORE

Secondly, and it's a pity the interviewer didn't follow up with this, the smartphone market is now mature, with on-device features and software comparable between $1,000 phones and $500 phones, and changing only a little year to year. That last part is crucial. If you're nonplussed about having to upgrade your trusty iPhone after two years, you may as well wait three. Another 12 months go past and it hasn't advanced much more... Why bother? Make that four.

As we argued recently, the "crisis" is self-inflicted – not only because Apple has pushed prices up, but partly because it has done the right thing and failed to honour the cynical tradition of built-in obsolescence. Its products are more durable and better supported than rival tat. So that four-year-old iPhone now runs pretty well again with iOS 12. Something shinier that isn't an iPhone demands your money.

What Apple's rebound from its 2013 Peak Apple crisis proved was that it's in an upgrade market. It doesn't attract so many new customers in mature markets. This means sales in emerging markets like India and China are far more important to Apple's future – and it's gradually making its flagship product less and less attractive to this new emerging middle class.

Cook pointed to 1.3 billion active users of Apple services (and $41bn annual revenue from those services). But this is what high iPhone prices imperil. Not so much here, but certainly in rapidly developing markets where it wants to keep customers for the long term.

Complacency also played a part. The iPhone XS and Max upgrades were lazy, offering only marginal improvements. Cook consistently points to the "bionic chip", something that emphasises how marginal its work is (Portrait mode and Animoji). The iPhone XR, meanwhile, is a genuine, head-scratching "what were they thinking?" product. It's clunky and very heavy (over 70g heavier than an iPhone 7) for a market used to slim, pocketable designs. This is something we – and almost nobody else – pointed out here in November, but it has since been expressed by people shunning the upgrade.

iPhone XR all colour group shot

Not a price cut! Apple perks up soggy iPhone demand with rebate boost

READ MORE

The short-term answer is to cut the price of the phones – which Apple has already started to do, tepidly, by stealth, via the rebate programme. I have my doubts that this will make much impact, at least in the UK where people know the value of their iPhones. You may as well stick yours on eBay. This initiative is a "rebate", yes, but a lousy "deal".

What to do

In the long term, Apple can do several things. It can price its products more shrewdly. We've often sung the praises here of the iPhone SE, the sub-£400 iPhone that offered modern components in a great package. But Apple axed the SE last September. Perhaps it needs to "do an SE" with more of its range – keeping the case and design but upgrading the components. And more obviously, it can price a strong product more sensibly: closer to £500 than the £749 where the XR starts today (and that confusing, un-Apple-like X-naming can also go).

iPhone XS

iPhone XS: Just another £300 for a better cam- Wait, come back!

READ MORE

Cook may be right that the market is too "emotional in the short term". But the market also attempts to price in long-term risks, and the biggest of those right now is that Apple becomes an irrelevance in emerging markets.

Cook offered Cramer a hint that peripherals and services around health might play a part: "I do think, looking back, in the future, you will answer that question, Apple's most important contribution to mankind has been in health."

Whose health, though? ®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022